Skip to main content
Log in

Making sense of predator scents: investigating the sophistication of predator assessment abilities of fathead minnows

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the threat-sensitive predator avoidance hypothesis, selection favors prey that accurately assess the degree of threat posed by a predator and adjust their anti-predator response to match the level of risk. Many species of animals rely on chemical cues to estimate predation risk; however, the information content conveyed in these chemical signatures is not well understood. We tested the threat-sensitive predator avoidance hypothesis by determining the specificity of the information conveyed to prey in the chemical signature of their predator. We found that fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) could determine the degree of threat posed by northern pike (Esox lucius) based on the concentration of chemical cues used. The proportion of minnows that exhibited an anti-predator response when exposed to a predator cue increased as the concentration of the pike cue used increased. More surprisingly, the prey could also distinguish large pike from small pike based on their odor alone. The minnows responded more intensely to cues of small pike than to cues of large pike. In this predator–prey system small pike likely represent a greater threat than large pike.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown GE, Dreier VM (2002) Predator inspection behavior and attack cone avoidance in a Characin fish: the effects of predator diet and prey experience. Anim Behav 63:1175–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GE, Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1995a) Localized defecation by pike: a response to labeling by cyprinid alarm pheromone? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GE, Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1995b) Fathead minnows avoid conspecific and heterospecific alarm pheromones in the faeces of northern pike. J Fish Biol 47:387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GE, Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1997) Differential learning rates of chemical versus visual cues of a northern pike by fathead minnows in a natural habitat. Environ Biol Fish 49:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GE, LeBlanc V, Porter LE (2001) Ontogenetic changes in the response of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides, Centrarchidae, Perciformes) to heterospecifc alarm pheromones. Ethology 107:401–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers DP, Mirza RS (2001a) Predator diet cues and the assessment of predation risk by aquatic vertebrates: a review and prospectus. In: Marchlewsk-Koj A, Lepri J, Müller-Schwarze D (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 9. Plenum, New York, pp 277–284

  • Chivers DP, Mirza RS (2001b) The importance of predator–diet cues in the responses of larval woodfrogs to fish and invertebrate predators. J Chem Ecol 27:45–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1993) The role of olfaction in chemosensory-based predator recognition in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. J Chem Ecol 19:623–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1994) The role of experience and chemical alarm signaling in predator recognition by fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas. J Fish Biol 44:273–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1995) Free-living fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) rapidly learn to recognize pike (Esox lucius) as predators. J Fish Biol 46:949–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1998) Chemical alarm signaling in aquatic predator–prey systems: a review and prospectus. Ecoscience 5:338–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivers DP, Mirza RS, Bryer PJ, Kiesecker JM (2001) Threat-sensitive predator avoidance by slimy sculpins: understanding the importance of visual versus chemical information. Can J Zool 79:867–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einfalt LM, Wahl DH (1997) Prey selection by juvenile walleye as influenced by prey morphology and behavior. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:2618–2626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hara TJ (1994) The diversity of chemical stimulation in fish olfaction and gustation. Rev Fish Biol Fish 4:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart PJB, Hamrin SF (1988) Pike as a selective predator: effects of prey size, availability, cover and pike jaw dimensions. Oikos 51:220–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart PJB, Hamrin SF (1990) The role of behavior and morphology in the selection of prey by pike. NATO ASI Ser G 20:235–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey C, Garneau F-X, Himmelman JH (1987) Chemodetection of the predatory seastar Leptasterias polari by the whelk Buccinum undatum. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 40:79–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfman GS (1989) Threat-sensitive predator avoidance in damselfish–trumpetfish interactions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Horat P, Semlitsch R (1994) Effects of predation risk and hunger on the behavior of two species of tadpoles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kats LB, Dill LM (1998) The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5:361–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Kats LB, Breeding JA, Hanson KM, Smith P (1994) Ontogenetic change in California newts (Taricha torosa) in response to chemical cues from conspecific predators. J North Am Benthol Soc 13:321–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1998) Stress and decision-making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral reproductive and ecological perspectives. Adv Study Behav 27:215–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Bednekoff PA (1999) Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis. Am Nat 153:649–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima S, Dill LM, (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison DM, Maerz JC, McDarby JH (1999) Optimization of predator avoidance by salamanders using chemical cues: diet and diel effects. Ecology 105:1073–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathis A, Smith RJF (1993) Chemical labeling of northern pike (Esox lucius) by the alarm pheromone of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). J Chem Ecol 19:1967–1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathis A, Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1996) Cultural transmission of predator recognition in fishes: intraspecific and interspecific learning. Anim Behav 51:185–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathis A, Murray Kl, Hickman CR (2003) Do experience and body size play a role in responses of larval ringed salamanders, Ambystoma annulatum, to predator kairomones? Laboratory and field assays. Ethology 109:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirza RS, Chivers DP (2002) Brook char (Salvelinus fontinalis) can differentiate chemical alarm cues produced by different age/size classes of conspecifics. J Chem Ecol 28:555–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson LB, Nilsson PA, Brönmark C (2000) Predator recognition and defense strategies in crucian carp, Carassius carssius. Oikos 88:200–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott WB, Crossman EJ (1979) Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fish Res Bd Can Bull 184, pp 1–966

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJF (1986) Evolution of alarm signals: role of benefits derived from retaining group members or territorial neighbors. Am Nat 128:604–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJF (1992) Alarm signals in fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish 2:33–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DJ, Lefcort H (1993) The effect of predator diet on the alarm response of red-legged frog, Rana aurora, tadpoles. Anim Behav 46:1017–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Darlene Kusch for her angling expertise and Dr. E.C. Kusch for his tackle and time. This study was funded by grants to D.P. Chivers from NSERC and the University of Saskatchewan. The research was conducted under the approval of the University Committee on Animal Care and Supply (Animal care protocol 19920077).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin C. Kusch.

Additional information

Communicated by A. Mathis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kusch, R.C., Mirza, R.S. & Chivers, D.P. Making sense of predator scents: investigating the sophistication of predator assessment abilities of fathead minnows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55, 551–555 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0743-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0743-8

Keywords

Navigation