Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 416–422 | Cite as

Kinship and food availability influence cannibalism tendency in early-instar wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae)

  • J. Andrew RobertsEmail author
  • Phillip W. Taylor
  • George W. Uetz
Original Article

Abstract

For potentially cannibalistic animals such as spiders, the ability to recognize and avoid kin and/or preferentially cannibalize non-relatives would permit exploiting conspecifics as prey while minimizing loss of inclusive fitness. We investigated the effects of relatedness and availability of alternative food on cannibalism tendency in pairs of juvenile Hogna helluo (Walckenaer), a North American wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae). For second-instar spiderlings (dispersing stage), cannibalism was more likely among pairs of non-sibs than pairs of sibs and, interestingly, was also more likely when other prey were available. We found no evidence of increased cannibalism in pairings involving broods of greatest average size disparity, indicating that size differences are unlikely to explain differences in cannibalism tendency. Additionally, the relative number of deaths from cannibalism or other causes did not increase with increasing risk of starvation. For third-instar spiderlings, which had lived independently of their mother and sibs following dispersal, cannibalism rates were very high in all treatments and there were no significant effects of relatedness or food availability. Our results suggest that spiders with predominantly solitary lifestyles may bias cannibalism toward non-kin during the juvenile associative period, and that this effect is lost in the subsequent instar. Results are discussed in the context of several potential mechanisms that might result in differential cannibalism.

Keywords

Kin discrimination Cannibalism Hogna helluo Spiderlings 

Notes

Acknowledgements

For financial support during this research, we thank the National Science Foundation (grant IBN 9906446 to G.W.U.); P.W.T. was awarded a University of Cincinnati post-doctoral fellowship. We are grateful to the Cincinnati Nature Center, Rowe Woods, for permission to collect spiders on their property. Kelly Roberts provided invaluable assistance with rearing and maintenance of spiders and staging of experiments. We are especially grateful to Trine Bilde and Yael Lubin for access to their previously unpublished data. We appreciate the editorial comments of Mark Elgar, Casey Harris, Jerald Hinn, Bruce Jayne, Scott Sakaluk, Sean Walker, and three anonymous reviewers. The work presented here adheres to all relevant laws and guidelines pursuant to the use of invertebrates in research in the United States of America.

References

  1. Anderson JF (1974) Responses to starvation in the spiders Lycosa lenta Hentz and Filistata hibernalis (Hentz). Ecology 55:576–585Google Scholar
  2. Andrade MCB (1996) Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the Australian redback spider. Science 271:70–72Google Scholar
  3. Andrade MCB (1998) Female hunger can explain variation in cannibalistic behavior despite male sacrifice in redback spiders. Behav Ecol 9:33–42Google Scholar
  4. Anthony CD (2003) Kinship influences cannibalism in the wolf spider, Pardosa milvina. J Insect Behav 16:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnqvist G, Henriksson S (1997) Sexual cannibalism in the fishing spider and a model for the evolution of sexual cannibalism based on genetic constraints. Evol Ecol 11:255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilde T, Lubin Y (2001) Non-kin biased cannibalism in a subsocial spider. J Evol Biol 14:959–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conover RJ (1966) Factors affecting the assimilation of organic matter by zooplankton and the question of superfluous feeding. Limnol Oceanogr 11:346–354Google Scholar
  8. Crespi BJ (1992) Cannibalism and trophic eggs in subsocial and eusocial insects. In: Elgar MA, Crespi BJ (eds) Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 176–213Google Scholar
  9. Dong Q, Polis GA (1992) The dynamics of cannibalistic populations: a foraging perspective. In: Elgar MA, Crespi BJ (eds) Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 13–37Google Scholar
  10. Dou S, Seikai T, Tsukamoto K (2000) Cannibalism in Japanese flounder juveniles, Paralichthys olivaceus, reared under controlled conditions. Aquaculture 182:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edgar WD (1969) Prey and predators of the wolf spider Lycosa lugubris. J Zool Lond 159:405–411Google Scholar
  12. Elgar MA (1992) Sexual cannibalism in spiders and other invertebrates. In: Elgar MA, Crespi BJ (eds) Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 128–155Google Scholar
  13. Elgar MA, Crespi BJ (1992) Ecology and evolution of cannibalism. In: Elgar MA, Crespi BJ (eds) Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  14. Elwood R (1992) Pup-cannibalism in rodents: causes and consequences. In: Elgar MA, Crespi BJ (eds) Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 299–322Google Scholar
  15. Evans TA (1999) Kin recognition in a social spider. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans TA, York-Main B (1993) Attraction between social crab spiders: silk pheromones in Diaea socialis. Behav Ecol 4:99–105Google Scholar
  17. Fletcher DJC (1987) The behavioral analysis of kin recognition: perspectives on methodology and interpretation. In: Fletcher DJC, Michener CD (eds) Kin recognition in animals. Wiley, Chichester, pp 19–54Google Scholar
  18. Foelix RF (1996) Biology of spiders, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenstone MH (1978) The numerical response to prey availability of Pardosa ramulosa (McCook) (Araneae: Lycosodae) and its relationship to the role of spiders in the balance of nature. Symp Zool Soc Lond 42:183–193Google Scholar
  20. Greenstone MH (1979) Spider behaviour optimises dietary essential amino acid composition. Nature 282:501–503Google Scholar
  21. Gundermann JL, Horel A, Krafft B (1993) Experimental manipulations of social tendencies in the subsocial spider, Coelotes terrestris. Insect Soc 40:219–229Google Scholar
  22. Hallander H (1970) Prey, cannibalism and microhabitat selection in the wolf spiders Pardosa chelata O. F. Müller and P. pullata Clerck. Oikos 21:337–340Google Scholar
  23. Hauber ME, Sherman PW (2000) The armpit effect in hamster kin recognition. Trends Ecol Evol 15:349–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hepper PG (1991) Recognizing kin: ontogeny and classification. In: Hepper PG (ed) Kin recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 259–288Google Scholar
  25. Jackson RR (1980a) Cannibalism as a factor in the mating strategy of the jumping spider Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae, Salticidae). Bull Br Arachnol Soc 5:129–133Google Scholar
  26. Jackson RR (1980b) Comparative studies of Dictyna and Mallos. V. Tolerance and resistance to starvation. Psyche 87:211–220Google Scholar
  27. Jackson RR (1987) Comparative study of releaser pheromone associated with the silk of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). N Z J Zool 14:1–10Google Scholar
  28. Jackson RR, Pollard S (1997) Jumping spider mating strategies: sex among cannibals in and out of webs. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 340–351Google Scholar
  29. Johnson JC (2001) Sexual cannibalism in fishing spiders (Dolomedes triton): an evaluation of two explanations for female aggression towards potential mates. Anim Behav 61:905–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones JS (1982) Of cannibals and kin. Nature 299:202–203Google Scholar
  31. Jones TC, Parker PG (2002) Delayed juvenile dispersal benefits both mother and offspring in the cooperative spider Anelosimus studiosus (Araneae: Theridiidae). Behav Ecol 13:142–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim KW (2000) Dispersal behaviour in a subsocial spider: group conflict and the effect of food availability. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:182–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim KW, Horel A (1998) Matriphagy in the spider Amaurobius ferox (Araneidae, Amaurobiidae): an example of mother-offspring interactions. Ethology 104:1021–1037Google Scholar
  34. Kim KW, Roland C, Horel A (2000) Functional value of matriphagy in the spider Amaurobius ferox. Ethology 106:729–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klahn JE, Gamboa GJ (1983) Social wasps: discrimination between kin and nonkin brood. Science 221:482–484Google Scholar
  36. Komdeur J, Hatchwell BJ (1999) Kin recognition: function and mechanism in avian societies. Trends Ecol Evol 14:237–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Krafft B, Horel A, Julita J-M (1986) Influence of food supply on the duration of the gregarious phase of a maternal-social spider, Coelotes terrestris (Araneae, Agelenidae). J Arachnol 14:219–226Google Scholar
  38. Lindstrom K, Sargent RC (1997) Food access, brood size, and filial cannibalism in the fantail darter, Etheostoma flabellare. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:107–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maupin JL, Riechert SE (2001) Superfluous killing in spiders: a consequence of adaptation to food-limited environments? Behav Ecol 12:569–576Google Scholar
  40. Miller GL (1989) Subsocial organization and behavior in broods of the obligate burrowing wolf spider Geolycosa turricola (Treat). Can J Zool 67:819–824Google Scholar
  41. Nossek ME, Rovner JS (1984) Agonistic behavior in female wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). J Arachnol 11:407–422Google Scholar
  42. Oelbermann K, Scheu S (2002) Effects of prey type and mixed diets on survival, growth and development of a generalist predator, Pardosa lugubris (Araneae: Lycosidae). Basic Appl Ecol 3:285–291Google Scholar
  43. Olsen KH (1992) Kin recognition in fish mediated by chemical cues. In: Hara TJ (ed) Fish chemoreception. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 229–248Google Scholar
  44. Panek LM, Gamboa GJ (2000) Queens of the paper wasp Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) discriminate among larvae on the basis of relatedness. Ethology 106:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pfennig DW (1997) Kinship and cannibalism: understanding why animals avoid preying on relatives offers insights into the evolution of social behaviour. BioScience 47:667–675Google Scholar
  46. Pfennig DW, Reeve HK, Sherman PW (1993) Kin recognition and cannibalism in spadefoot toad tadpoles. Anim Behav 46:87–94Google Scholar
  47. Pfennig DW, Sherman PW, Collins JP (1994) Kin recognition and cannibalism in polyphonic salamanders. Behav Ecol 5:225–232Google Scholar
  48. Polis G (1981) The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:225–251Google Scholar
  49. Pourie G, Trabalon M (1999) Agonistic behaviour of female Tegenaria atrica in the presence of different aged spiderlings. Physiol Entomol 24:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Riechert SE (1981) The consequences of being territorial: spiders, a case study. Am Nat 117:871–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Riechert SE, Harp JM (1987) Nutritional ecology of spiders. In: Slansky F, Rodriguez JG (eds) Nutritional ecology of insects, mites and spiders. Wiley, New York, pp 645–672Google Scholar
  52. Ruttan LM (1990) Experimental manipulations of dispersal in the subsocial spider, Theridion pictum. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:169–173Google Scholar
  53. Rypstra AL (1986) High prey abundance and a reduction in cannibalism: the first step to sociality in spiders (Arachnida). J Arachnol 14:193–200Google Scholar
  54. Sadler LM, Elgar MA (1994) Cannibalism among amphibian larvae: a case of good taste. Trends Ecol Evol 9:5–6Google Scholar
  55. Samu F, Toft S, Kiss B (1999) Factors influencing cannibalism in the wolf spider Pardosa agrestis (Araneae, Lycosidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sasaki T, Iwahashi O (1995) Sexual cannibalism in an orb-weaving spider Argiope aemula. Anim Behav 49:1119–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schausberger P, Croft BA (2001) Kin recognition and larval cannibalism by adult females in specialist predaceous mites. Anim Behav 61:459–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schneider JM (1995) Survival and growth in groups of a subsocial spider (Stegodyphus lineatus). Insect Soc 42:237–248Google Scholar
  59. Schneider JM (1996) Food intake, growth and relatedness in the subsocial spider, Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae). Ethology 102:386–396Google Scholar
  60. Schneider JM, Lubin Y (1996) Infanticidal male eresid spiders. Nature 381:655–656Google Scholar
  61. Schneider JM, Lubin Y (1997) Infanticide by males in a spider with suicidal maternal care, Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae). Anim Behav 54:305–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Searcy LE, Rypstra AL, Persons MH (1999) Airborne chemical communication in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina. J Chem Ecol 25:2527–2533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Seibt U, Wickler W (1987) Gerontophagy versus cannibalism in the social spiders Stegodyphus mimosarum Pavesi and Stegodyphus dumicola Pocock. Anim Behav 35:1903–1904Google Scholar
  64. Tang-Martinez Z (2001) The mechanisms of kin discrimination and the evolution of kin recognition in vertebrates: a critical re-evaluation. Behav Process 53:21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Taylor PW (1998) Dragline-mediated mate-searching in Trite planiceps (Araneae, Salticidae). J Arachnol 26:330–334Google Scholar
  66. Taylor PW, Jackson RR (1999) Habitat-adapted communication in Trite planiceps, a New Zealand jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae). N Z J Zool 26:127–154Google Scholar
  67. Tietjen WJ (1979a) Tests for olfactory communication in four species of wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). J Arachnol 6:197–206Google Scholar
  68. Tietjen WJ (1979b) Is the sex pheromone of Lycosa rabida (Araneae: Lycosidae) deposited on a substratum? J Arachnol 6:207–212Google Scholar
  69. Toft S, Wise DH (1999a) Growth, development and survival of a generalist predator fed single- and mixed-species diets of different quality. Oecologia 119:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Toft S, Wise DH (1999b) Behavioral and ecophysiological responses of a generalist predator to single- and mixed-species diets of different quality. Oecologia 119:198–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Trabalon M, Bagneres AG, Hartmann N, Vallet AM (1996) Changes in cuticular compounds composition during the gregarious period and after dispersal of the young in Tegenaria atrica (Araneae, Agelenidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 26:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Uetz GW, Bischoff J, Raver J (1992) Survivorship of wolf spiders (Lycosidae) reared on different diets. J Arachnol 20:207–211Google Scholar
  73. Wagner JD (1995) Egg sac inhibits filial cannibalism in the wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata. Anim Behav 50:555–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wagner JD, Wise DH (1996) Cannibalism regulates densities of young wolf spiders: evidence from field and laboratory experiments. Ecology 77:639–652Google Scholar
  75. Wagner JD, Wise DH (1997) Influence of prey availability and conspecifics on patch quality for a cannibalistic forager: laboratory experiments with the wolf spider Schizocosa. Oecologia 109:474–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Walker SE, Marshall SD, Rypstra AL, Taylor DH (1999) The effects of hunger on locomotory behaviour in two species of wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae). Anim Behav 58:515–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Walls SC, Roudebush RE (1991) Reduced aggression toward siblings as evidence of kin recognition in cannibalistic salamanders. Am Nat 138:1027–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yeargan KV (1975) Prey and periodicity of Pardosa ramulosa (McCook) in alfalfa. Environ Entomol 4:137–141Google Scholar
  79. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp 486–515Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Andrew Roberts
    • 1
    Email author
  • Phillip W. Taylor
    • 1
    • 2
  • George W. Uetz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations