Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of female arrivals on mate monopolization in the yellow dung fly

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The degree of resource monopolization relates to the distribution of resources in space and time. In general, monopolization is predicted to be high when resources (food or mates) are clumped in space, dispersed in time, and predictable in space or time. Using the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae), we qualitatively tested a general model that predicts the distribution of mating success among competing males based on the temporal pattern of female arrivals relative to mating time and a ranking of males in priority of access to the resource (here by body size). In a laboratory experiment approximating the natural mating situation, a constant number of males of various sizes were allowed to compete for females. As predicted, mate monopolization decreased as the temporal clumping of female arrivals increased, mediated by either a decrease in the mean or an increase in the variance of female inter-arrival times, which were manipulated independently. Males appeared to adjust their behavior to variation in female arrivals in a manner consistent with the marginal value theory of Parker and associates: forcible take-overs of females were rarer, and copula durations shorter, when females arrived regularly at short intervals. Therefore, a complex interaction of variation in intrinsic characteristics affecting male resource holding potential, mating time and stochastic, extrinsic variables increasing temporal clumping of mates generally reduces the variance in mating success among competing males and thus ultimately the opportunity and intensity of sexual selection on traits influencing male success. This theory extends operational sex ratio theory at the mechanistic, behavioral level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso-Pimentel H, Papaj DR (1996) Operational sex ratio versus gender density as determinants of copulation duration in the walnut fly, Rhagoletis juglandis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Arnold SJ, Duvall D (1994) Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. Am Nat 143:317–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ, Wade MJ (1984) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory and applications. Evolution 38:709–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanckenhorn WU (1991) Foraging in groups of water striders: effects of variability in handling time and prey arrivals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:221–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanckenhorn WU, Caraco T (1992) Social subordinance and a resource queue. Am Nat 139:442–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanckenhorn WU, Viele STN (1999) Foraging in yellow dung flies: testing for a small male time budget advantage. Ecol Entomol 24:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanckenhorn WU, Grant JWA, Fairbairn DJ (1998) Monopolization in a resource queue: water striders competing for food and mates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanckenhorn WU, Morf C, Reuter M (2000) Are dung flies ideal-free distributed at their mating and oviposition sites? Behaviour 137:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgia G (1980) Sexual competition in Scatophaga stercoraria: size- and density related changes in male ability to capture females. Behaviour 75:185–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgia G (1981) Mate selection in the fly Scatophaga stercoraria: female choice in a male-controlled system. Anim Behav 29:71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL (1964) The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. Wilson Bull 76:160–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant MJ, Grant JWA (1995) Resource defence, monopolization and variation of fitness in groups of female Japanese medaka depend on the synchrony of food arrival. Anim Behav 49:1469–1479

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1992) Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q Rev Biol 67:437–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foster W (1967) Hormone-mediated nutritional control of sexual behavior in male dung flies. Science 158:1596–1597

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant JWA, Kramer DL (1992) Temporal clumping of food arrival reduces its monopolization and defence by zebra fish, Brachydanio rerio. Anim Behav 44:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant JWA, Bryant MJ, Soos CE (1995) Operational sex ratio, mediated by synchrony of female arrival, alters the variance of male mating success in Japanese medaka. Anim Behav 49:367–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant JWA, Gaboury C, Levitt HL (2000) Competitor-to-resource ratio, a general formulation of operational sex ratio, as a predictor of competitive aggression in Japanese medaka. Behav Ecol 11:670–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jann P, Blanckenhorn WU, Ward PI (2000) Temporal and microspatial variation in the intensities of natural and sexual selection in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria. J Evol Biol 13:927–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraushaar U, Blanckenhorn WU (2002) Population variation in sexual selection and its effect on body size allometry in two species of flies with contrasting sexual size dimorphism. Evolution 56:307–321

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunn CL (1999) The number of males in primate social groups: a comparative test of the socioecological model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1970a) The reproductive behaviour and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scatophagidae). V. The female's behaviour at the oviposition site. Behaviour 37:140–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1970b) The reproductive behaviour and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scatophagidae). II. The fertilisation rate and the spatial and temporal relationships of each sex around the site of mating and oviposition. J Anim Ecol 39:205–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1970c) Sperm competition and its evolutionary effect on copula duration in the fly Scatophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scatophagidae). J Insect Physiol 16:1301–1328

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1970d) The reproductive behaviour and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria L. (Diptera: Scathophagidae). IV. Epigamic recognition and competition between males for the possession of females. Behaviour 37:113–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum NS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 123–166

  • Parker GA, Simmons LW (1994) Evolution of phenotypic optima and copula duration in dungflies. Nature 370:53–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Simmons LW (2000) Optimal copula duration in yellow dung flies: ejaculatory duct dimensions and size-dependent sperm displacement. Evolution 54:924–935

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Simmons LW, Ward PI (1993) Optimal copula duration in dungflies: effects of frequency dependence and female mating status. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter M, Ward PI, Blanckenhorn WU (1998) An ESS treatment of the pattern of female arrival at the mating site in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria. J Theor Biol 195:363–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sigurjónsdóttir H, Parker GA (1981) Dung fly struggles: evidence for assessment strategy. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Sirot LK, Brockmann HJ (2001) Costs of sexual interactions to females in Rambur's forktail damselfly, Ischnura ramburi. Anim Behav 61:415–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Sutherland WJ (1985) Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman's data. Anim Behav 33:1349–1352

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The Evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  • Verell PA, Krenz JD (1998) Competition for mates in the mole salamander, Ambystoma talpoideum: tactics that may maximize male mating success. Behaviour 135:121–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward PI, Simmons LW (1991) Copula duration and testes size in the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria (L.): the effects of diet, body size, and mating history. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner RR (1980) The coevolution of behavioral and life-history characteristics. In: Barlow GW, Silverberg J (eds) Sociobiology: beyond nature/nurture? Westview, Boulder, Colo., pp 151–188

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Swiss National Fund for financial support. This experiment was performed by students of the behavioral biology course 2001 at the University of Zürich.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolf U. Blanckenhorn.

Additional information

Communicated by L. Simmons

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blanckenhorn, W.U., Frei, J. & Birrer, M. The effect of female arrivals on mate monopolization in the yellow dung fly. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54, 65–70 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0594-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0594-3

Keywords

Navigation