Skip to main content
Log in

Male-biased sex ratios in New Zealand fur seal pups relative to environmental variation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of models have been proposed to provide adaptive explanations of sex-ratio variation in mammals. Two models have been applied commonly to primates and ungulates with varying success—the Trivers-Willard (TW) hypothesis, and the local resource competition (LRC) hypothesis. For polygynous, sexually dimorphic mammals, where males are larger and disperse more readily, these models predict opposite outcomes of sex-ratio adjustment within the same environmental context (high-resource years: TW—more sons; LRC—more daughters). However, many of the predictions of these two models can vary depending on factors influencing resource availability, such as environmental stochasticity, resource predictability, and population density. The New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) is a polygynous mammal showing marked sexual dimorphism (larger males), with higher variation in male reproductive success expected. We provide clear evidence of male-biased sex ratios from a large sample of A. forsteri pups captured around South Island, New Zealand during 1996/1998, even after accounting for a sex bias in capture probability. The extent of the bias depended upon year and, in 1998, strong climatic perturbations (El Niño/Southern Oscillation, ENSO) probably reduced food availability. Significant male-biased sex ratios were found in all years; however, there was a significant decline in the male bias in 1998. There was no relationship between sex ratio and population density. We suggest that the sex-ratio bias resulted from the production of relatively more male pups. Under the density-independent scenario, the strong male bias in A. forsteri sex ratios is support for the TW model within an environment of high resource predictability. We suggest that some plasticity in the determination of pup sex among years is a mechanism by which A. forsteri females in New Zealand, and perhaps other otariid seals, can maximise fitness benefits when living in regions of high, yet apparently predictable, environmental variability. We also suggest that much of the inconsistency in the reported sex ratios for otariid seals results from the complex interaction of population density and environmental stochasticity influencing relative food availability over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonelis GA, Ragen TJ, Rooks NJ (1994) Male-biased secondary sex ratios of northern fur seals on the Pribilof Islands, Alaska, 1989 and 1992. In: Sinclair EH (ed) Fur seal investigations, 1992. Technical Memo NMFS-AFSC-45. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, pp 84–89

  • Arnbom T, Fedak MA, Rothery P (1994) Offspring sex ratio in relation to female size in southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:373–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnould JPY, Boyd IL, Rawlins DR, Hindell MA (2001) Variation in maternal provisioning by lactating Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella): response to experimental manipulation in pup demand. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:461–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Austad SN, Sunquist ME (1986) Sex-ratio manipulation in the common opossum. Nature 324:58–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew GA (1970) A model for the evolution of pinniped polygyny. Evolution 24:546–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Basher RE (1998) The 1997/98 El Niño event: impacts, responses and outlook for New Zealand. 73. Ministry of Research, Science and Technology, Wellington

  • Boltnev AI, York AE, Antonelis GA (1998) Northern fur seal young: interrelationships among birth size, growth, and survival. Can J Zool 76:843–854

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner WN (1968) The fur seal of South Georgia. Rep. No. 56. British Antarctic Survey, London

  • Boyd IL (2000) State-dependent fertility in pinnipeds: contrasting capital and income breeders. Funct Ecol 14:623–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd IL, McCann TS (1989) Pre-natal investment in reproduction by female Antarctic fur seals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:377–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd IL, Lunn NJ, Rothery P, Croxall JP (1995) Population demography of Antarctic fur seals: the costs of reproduction and implications for life-histories. J Anim Ecol 64:505–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd IL, McCafferty DJ, Reid K, Taylor R, Walker TR (1998) Dispersal of male and female Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:845–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw CJA, Lalas C, Perriman L, Harcourt RG, Best H, Davis LS (1999) Seasonal oscillation in shore attendance and transience of New Zealand fur seals. Can J Zool 77:814–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw CJA, Davis LS, Lalas C, Harcourt RG (2000a) Geographic and temporal variation in the condition of pups of the New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri): evidence for density dependence and differences in the marine environment. J Zool Lond 252:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw CJA, Lalas C, Thompson CM (2000b) Clustering of colonies in an expanding population of New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri). J Zool Lond 250:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw CJA, Davis LS, Purvis M, Zhou Q, Benwell GL (2002) Using artificial neural networks to model the suitability of coastline for breeding by New Zealand fur seals. Ecol Model 148:111–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw CJA, Barker RJ, Harcourt RG, Davis LS (2003) Estimating survival and capture probability of fur seal pups using multi-state mark-recapture models. J Mammal 84:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Burnham KP, Augustin NH (1997) Model selection: an integral part of inference. Biometrics 53:603–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskirk SW, Lindstedt SL (1989) Sex biases in trapped samples of Mustelidae. J Mammal 70:88–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Byholm P, Ranta E, Kaitala V, Lindén H, Saurola P, Wikman M (2002) Resource availability and goshawk offspring sex ratio variation: a large-scale ecological phenomenon. J Anim Ecol 71:994–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Calambokidis J, Gentry RL (1985) Mortality of northern fur seal pups in relation to growth and birth weights. J Wildl Dis 21:327–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron EZ, Linklater WL (2000) Individual mares bias investment in sons and daughters in relation to their condition. Anim Behav 60:359–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron EZ, Linklater WL, Stafford KJ, Veltman CJ (1999) Birth sex ratios relate to mare condition at conception in Kaimanawa horses. Behav Ecol 10:472–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Clark AB (1978) Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science 201:163–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark MM, Galef BG Jr (1995) A gerbil dam's fetal intrauterine position affects the sex ratios of litters she gestates. Physiol Behav 57:297–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1982) Parental investment in male and female offspring in mammals. In: Group KCS (ed) Current problems in sociobiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 223–247

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Iason GR (1986) Sex ratio variation in mammals. Rev Biol 61:339–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1981) Parental investment in male and female offspring in polygynous mammals. Nature 289:487–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1984) Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer. Nature 308:358–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn A, Legge S, Double MC (2002) Sex ratios in birds and mammals: can the hypotheses be disentangled? In: Hardy ICW (ed) Sex ratios: concepts and research methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 267–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa DP, Trillmich F, Croxall JP (1988) Intraspecific allometry of neonatal size in the Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus galapagoensis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:361–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M (2001) Offspring sex ratio in relation to maternal age and social rank in mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:260–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MC (1975) Growth of New Zealand fur seal pups. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res 9:539–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman CR (1988) Sex-ratio variation in response to interspecific competition. Am Nat 132:289–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittus WPJ (1998) Birth sex ratios in toque macaques and other mammals: integrating the effects of maternal condition and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:149–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Doidge DW, Croxall JP, Baker JR (1984) Density-dependent pup mortality in the Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella at South Georgia. J Zool Lond 202:449–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Fowler CW (1990) Density dependence in northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus). Mar Mammal Sci 6:171–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis JM, Heath CB (1991) The effects of El Niño on the frequency and sex ratio of suckling yearlings in the California sea lion. In: Trillmich F, Ono KA (eds) Pinnipeds and El Niño: responses to environmental stress, vol 88. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 193–201

  • Frank SA (1990) Sex allocation theory for birds and mammals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:13–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrt SD, Fritzell EK (1996) Sex-biased response of raccoons (Procyon lotor) to live traps. Am Midl Nat 135:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry RL, Kooyman GL (1986) Fur seals: maternal strategies on land and at sea. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Georges J-Y, Guinet C (2000a) Early mortality and perinatal growth in the subantarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus tropicalis) on Amsterdam Island. J Zool Lond 251:277–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Georges J-Y, Guinet C (2000b) Maternal care in the subantarctic fur seals on Amsterdam Island. Ecology 81:295–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Georges J-Y, Guinet C (2001) Prenatal investment in the subantarctic fur seal, Arctocephalus tropicalis. Can J Zool 79:601–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel ME, Calambokidis J (1998) Neonatal growth and behavior. In: Gentry RL (ed) Behavior and ecology of the northern fur seal. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 233–242

  • Goldsworthy SD (1992) Maternal care in three species of southern fur seal (Arctocephalus spp.). PhD Thesis, Monash University, Melbourne

  • Goldsworthy SD, Shaughnessy PD (1994) Breeding biology and haul-out pattern of the New Zealand fur seal, Arctocephalus forsteri, at Cape Gantheaume, South Australia. Wildl Res 21:365–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling LM (1986) Selective abortion of entire litters in the coypu: adaptive control of offspring production in relation to quality and sex. Am Nat 127:772–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinet C, Roux J-P, Bonnet M, Mison V (1998) Effect of body size, body mass, and body condition on reproduction of female South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus) in Namibia. Can J Zool 76:1418–1424

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinet C, Lea M-A, Goldsworthy SD (2000) Mass change in Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella) pups in relation to maternal characteristics at the Kerguèlen Islands. Can J Zool 78:476–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinet C, Dubroca L, Lea MA, Goldsworthy S, Cherel Y, Duhamel G, Bonadonna F, Donnay J-P (2001) Spatial distribution of the foraging activity of Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella females in relation to oceanographic factors: a scale-dependent approach using geographic information systems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 219:251–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt RG, Schulman AM, Davis LS, Trillmich F (1995) Summer foraging by lactating female New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri) off Otago Peninsula, New Zealand. Can J Zool 73:678–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt RG, Bradshaw CJA, Davis LS (2001) Summer foraging behaviour of a generalist predator, the New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri). Wildl Res 28:599–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt RG, Bradshaw CJA, Dickson K, Davis LS (2002) Foraging ecology of a generalist predator, the female New Zealand fur seal. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 227:11–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy IC (1997) Possible factors influencing vertebrate sex ratios: an introductory overview. Appl Anim Behav Sci 51:217–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison AJM, Andersen M, Gaillard J-M, Linnell JDC, Delorme D (1999) Contradictory findings in studies of sex ratio variation in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:339–348

    Google Scholar 

  • James WH (1997) A potential mechanism for sex ratio variation in mammals. J Theor Biol 189:253–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CN, Ritchie EG (2002) Adaptive biases in offspring sex ratios established before birth in a marsupial, the common brushtail possum Trichosurus vulpecula. Behav Ecol 13:653–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Julliard R (2000) Sex-specific dispersal in spatially varying environments leads to habitat-dependent evolutionary stable offspring sex ratios. Behav Ecol 11:421–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojola I, Eloranta E (1989) Influences of maternal body weight, age, and parity on sex ratio in semidomesticated reindeer (Rangifer t. tarandus). Evolution 43:1331–1336

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackow S (1995) Potential mechanisms for sex ratio adjustment in mammals and birds. Biol Rev 70:225–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackow S (1997) Maternal investment, sex-differentiated prospects, and the sex ratio in wild house mice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:435–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk LEB, Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Pemberton JM, Guinness FE (1999) Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer. Nature 399:459–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalas C, Bradshaw CJA (2001) Folklore and chimerical numbers: review of a millennium of interaction between fur seals and humans in the New Zealand region. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res 35:477–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalas C, Harcourt R (1995) Pup production of the New Zealand fur seal on Otago Peninsula, New Zealand. J R Soc N Z 25:81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalas C, Murphy B (1998) Increase in the abundance of New Zealand fur seals at the Catlins, South Island, New Zealand. Roy Soc N Z 28:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea M-A, Hindell MA, Guinet C, Goldsworthy S (2001) Variability in the diving activity of Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, at Iles Kerguelen. Polar Biol 25:269–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton J-D, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol Monogr 62:67–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunn NJ, Arnould JPY (1997) Maternal investment in Antarctic fur seals: evidence for equality in the sexes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:351–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunn NJ, Boyd IL (1991) Pupping-site fidelity of Antarctic fur seals at Bird Island, South Georgia. J Mammal 72:202–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ (1997) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman & Hall, London

  • Mattlin RH (1981) Pup growth of the New Zealand fur seal Arctocephalus forsteri on the Open Bay Islands, New Zealand. J Zool Lond 193:305–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattlin RH (1987) New Zealand fur seal, Arctocephalus forsteri, within the New Zealand region. In: Croxall JP, Gentry RL (eds) Status, biology, and ecology of fur seals. National Marine Fisheries Service, Cambridge, pp 49–51

  • Maynard-Smith J (1980) A new theory of sexual selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:247–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Mison-Jooste V (1999) Contribution à l'étude de la biologie des populations de l'otarie à fourrure du Cap (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus): les soins maternels diffèrent-ils en fonction du sexe du jeune? PhD Thesis, University of Lyons

  • Nichols JD, Sauer JR, Pollock KH, Hestbeck JB (1992) Estimating transition probabilities for stage-based population projection matrices using capture-recapture data. Ecology 73:306–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono KA, Boness DJ (1991) The influence of El Niño on mother-pup behaviour, pup ontogeny, and sex ratios in the California sea lion. In: Trillmich F, Ono KA (eds) Pinnipeds and El Niño: responses to environmental stress, vol 88. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 185–192

  • Ono KA, Boness DJ (1996) Sexual dimorphism in sea lion pups: differential maternal investment, or sex-specific differences in energy allocation? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosthuizen WH (1991) General movements of South African (Cape) fur seals Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus from analysis of recoveries of tagged animals. S Afr J Mar Sci 11:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer C, Collines DA, Eberley LE (2000) Problems with primate sex ratios. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 355:1627–1635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer AR (2000) Quasireplication and the contract of error: lessons from sex ratios, heritabilities and fluctuating asymmetry. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:441–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand RW (1956) The Cape fur seal Arctocephalus pusillus (Schreber). Its general characteristics and moult. Investigational Report 21. Division of Fisheries South Africa, Cape Town

  • Rutberg AT (1986) Lactation and fetal sex ratios in American bison. Am Nat 127:89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaik CP van, Hrdy SB (2002) Intensity of local resource competition shapes the relationship between maternal rank and sex ratios at birth in cercopithecine primates. Am Nat 138:1555–1562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulman AM (1996) Individual variation in maternal care and its effects on pup growth rate in the New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) on the Otago Peninsula, New Zealand. MSc Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin

  • Shaughnessy PD (1993) Population estimates of the Cape fur seal Arctocephalus pusillus. 2. From tagging and recapturing. In: Boonstra HGvD (ed) Investigational Report 134. Sea Fisheries Research Unit, Cape Town

  • Silk JB (1983) Local resource competition and facultative adjustment of sex ratios in relation to competitive abilities. Am Nat 121:56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson MJA, Simpson AE (1982) Birth sex ratios and social rank in rhesus monkey mothers. Nature 300:440–441

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 2nd edn. Freeman, New York

  • Stirling I (1971) Studies on the behaviour of the South Australian fur seal, Arctocephalus forsteri (Lesson). II. Adult females and pups. Aust J Zool 19:267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Trillmich F (1986) Maternal investment and sex-allocation in the Galapagos fur seal, Arctocephalus galapagoensis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Trillmich F (1996) Parental investment in pinnipeds. Adv Stud Behav 25:533–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Trillmich F, Kooyman GL (2001) Field metabolic rate of lactating female Galapagos fur seals (Arctocephalus galapagoenis): the influence of offspring age and environment. Comp Biochem Physiol A 129:741–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Trites AW (1991) Fetal growth of northern fur seals: life-history strategy and sources of variation. Can J Zool 69:2608–2617

    Google Scholar 

  • Trites AW (1992) Fetal growth and the condition of pregnant northern fur seals off western North America from 1958 to 1972. Can J Zool 70:2125–2131

    Google Scholar 

  • Trites AW (1993) Biased estimates of fur seal pup mass: origins and implications. J Zool Lond 229:515–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179

  • Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West SA, Sheldon BC (2002) Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment. Science 295:1685–1688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1979) The question of adaptive sex ratio in outcrossed vertebrates. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:567–580

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research was funded by the University of Otago. We also thank Allflex New Zealand (Palmerston North) for providing the plastic tags used to identify fur seal pups, Combined Rural Traders Society (Otago) for providing field equipment, and Next Stop Backpackers (Dunedin) for providing accommodation for volunteers. We particularly thank the Department of Zoology (University of Otago), New Zealand Department of Conservation, Landcare Research New Zealand, and New Zealand Sea Adventures (Kaikoura) for logistic support. We thank A. Anderson, G. Anderson, C. Bevers, K. Barton, C. Duncan, C. Littnan, N. McNally, I. Rasmussen, B. Thomas, M. Wright and the many volunteers who assisted with data collection. We thank R.J. Barker for providing statistical advice, and the editor, F. Trillmich, and two anonymous referees for greatly improving the manuscript. All animal treatment procedures were approved by the University of Otago Animal Ethics Committee (no. 83-95) and licensed under a New Zealand Department of Conservation Permit to Take Marine Mammals (30 July 1996).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corey J. A. Bradshaw.

Additional information

Communicated by F. Trillmich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bradshaw, C.J.A., Harcourt, R.G. & Davis, L.S. Male-biased sex ratios in New Zealand fur seal pups relative to environmental variation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53, 297–307 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0580-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0580-9

Keywords

Navigation