Skip to main content
Log in

Interacting effects of ambient light and plumage color patterns in displaying Wire-tailed Manakins (Aves, Pipridae)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sending color signals to conspecifics may attract predators, leading to opposing selection pressures on the evolution of signal expression and display behavior in animals. The costs of signaling can be reduced, however, because conspicuousness is the combined result of the reflectance spectra of the displayer's color pattern and the spectra of ambient light illuminating the animal. Changes in ambient light can alter conspicuousness, even when chemical and structural color-generating mechanisms remain constant, potentially allowing animals to display their colors most fully in light environments where the benefits are greatest relative to the costs. Using spectroradiometric methods, we determined how light habitat use affects conspicuousness in adult males of the Wire-tailed Manakin Pipra filicauda, a lekking bird species with vivid plumage colors. We studied three aspects of visibility, including properties of the entire color pattern, visual contrast within an individual's plumage and a bird's contrast relative to its visual background. Wire-tailed Manakins usually displayed in forest shade environments, which reduced their conspicuousness at larger viewing distances, while maximizing visual contrast within the plumage color pattern at close viewing distances. Compared to sunspots, ambient light in forest shade reduces the contrast of individual bird colors with the background at close viewing distance. However, background contrast of individual bird colors in the shade was still relatively higher during sunny than during cloudy weather which may explain why males were more active when the sun was not blocked by clouds. Assuming that the visual perceptions of predators and other manakins do not differ from the reflectance patterns we measured, Wire-tailed manakins tend to display in light environments that reduce the conflicts between avoiding long distance detection by predators and displaying conspicuous color signals to visiting females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

  • Andersson S, Rydell J, Svensson MGE (1998) Light, predation and the lekking behaviour of the ghost swift Hepialus humuli (L.) (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae). Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1345–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anhuf D, Winkler H (1999) Geographical and ecological settings of the Surumoni-Crane-Project (Upper Orinoco, Estado Amazonas, Venezuela). Anz Abstr I 135:3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow GW (1976) The midas cichlid in Nicaragua. In: Thorson TB (ed) Investigations of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan lakes. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 332–358

  • Barry KL, Hawryshyn CW (1999) Effects of incident light and background conditions on potential conspicuousness of Hawaiian coral reef fish. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 79:495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic Press, London

  • Bowmaker JK, Heath LA, Wilkie SE, Hunt DM (1997) Visual pigments and oil droplets from six classes of photoreceptor in the retinas of birds. Vision Res 37:2183–2194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher GS, Rohwer S (1989) The evolution of conspicuous and distinctive coloration for communication in birds. Curr Ornithol 6:51–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry MI, Bennett ATD (2001) Egg colour matching in an African cuckoo, as revealed by ultraviolet-visible reflectance spectrophotometry. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:565–571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD, Partridge JC, Maier EJ (1999) Plumage reflectance and the objective assessment of avian sexual dichromatism. Am Nat 160:183–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale S, Slagsvold T (1996) Plumage coloration and conspicuousness in birds: experiments with the Pied flycatcher. Auk 113:849–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London

  • Davies NB (1978) Territorial defence in the Speckled Wood Butterfly (Pararge aegeria): the resident always wins. Anim Behav 26:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1978) A predator's view of animal color patterns. Evol Biol 11:319–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1980) Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1984) Progressive background in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis. Biol J Linn Soc 22:187–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1987) Predation, light intensity and courtship behaviour in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Anim Behav 35:1376–1385

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1990) On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns. Biol J Linn Soc 41:315–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1991) Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions. Vision Res 31:587–608

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 39:S125-S153

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1993) The color of light in forests and its implication. Ecol Monogr 63:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA, Théry M (1996) Interacting effects of lek placement, display behavior, ambient light, and color patterns in three Neotropical forest-dwelling birds. Am Nat 148:421–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman LJ, Persons M (2001) The influence of stimulus and background colour on signal visibility in the lizard Anolis cristatellus. J Exp Biol 204:1559–1575

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman LJ, Bowman M, Saunders D, Miller WE, Rury MJ, Loew ER (1997) The visual ecology of Puerto Rican anoline lizards: habitat light and spectral sensitivity. J Comp Physiol A 181:446–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götmark F, Hohlfält A (1995) Bright male plumage and predation risk in passerine birds: are males easier to detect than females? Oikos 74:475–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Grill CP, Rush VN (2000) Analysing spectral data: comparison and application of two techniques. Biol J Linn Soc 69:121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford T, Dawkins MS (1991) Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Anim Behav 42:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas R (1976) Sexual selection in Nothobranchius guntheri (Pisces: Cyprinodontidae). Evolution 20:614–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart NS, Partridge JC, Cuthill IC (1998) Visual pigments, oil droplets and cone photoreceptor distribution in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). J Exp Biol 201:1433–1446

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heindl M (2002) Social organization on leks of the Wire-tailed Manakin in Southern Venezuela. Condor 104:772–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt S, Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Griffiths R (1998) Blue tits are ultraviolet tits. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:451–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JS, Leith BH, Rawlings P (1977) Polymorphism in Cepea: A problem with too many solutions? Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8:109–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk JTO (1994) Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Kirkpatrick M, Price T, Arnold SJ (1990) The Darwin-Fisher theory of sexual selection in monogamous birds. Evolution 44:180–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd JE (1975) Aggressive mimicry in Photurus: signal repertoire by femmes fatales. Science 187:452–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Lythgoe JN (1979) The ecology of vision. Clarendon Press, Oxford

  • Moodie GEE (1972) Predation, natural selection, and adaptation in an unusual threespine stickleback. Heredity 28:155–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottram JC (1915) Some observations of pattern-blending with reference to obliterative shading and concealment of outline. Proc Zool Soc 1915:679–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Osorio D, Vorobyev M, Jones CD (1999) Colour vision of domestic chicks. J Exp Biol 202:2951–2959

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Persons MH, Fleishman LJ, Frye MA, Stimphil ME (1999) Sensory response patterns and the evolution of visual signal design in anoline lizards. J Comp Physiol A 184:585–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrewicz AT, Kamil AC (1977) Visual detection of cryptic prey by blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata). Science 195:580–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckardt R (2000) Phänologie einer Vogelgemeinschaft in einem Tieflandregenwald am oberen Orinoco (Estado Amazonas, Venezuela). Master's thesis, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

  • Rowe C (1999) Receiver psychology and the evolution of multiple-component signals. Anim Behav 58:921–931

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ (1990) Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxf Surv Evol Biol 7:157–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz P, Snow DW (1978) Display and related behavior of the Wire-tailed Manakin. Living Bird 17:51–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner FB (1934) Does "protective coloration" protect? Results of some experiments with fishes and birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 20:559–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorobyev M, Osorio D, Bennett ATD, Marshall NJ, Cuthill IC (1998) Tetrachromacy, oil droplets and bird plumage colours. J Comp Physiol A 183:621–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walls GL (1942) The vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, Mich.

  • Yamanouchi T (1956) The visual acuity of the coral fish, Microanthus strigatus (Cuvier and Valenciennes). Publ Seto Mar Biol Lab 5:133–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuk M, Decruyenaere JG (1994) Measuring individual variation in colour: a comparison of two techniques. Biol J Linn Soc 53:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully thank M. Théry, R. Wagner, D. Blomqvist, two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor, J. Dickinson, for critical comments and discussions which greatly improved this manuscript. We also would like to thank C. Budde, C. Sandforth and G. Odenwälder for helping to net and band birds. H. Kühbauer and S. Laube gave valuable hints for the location of leks. This study was supported financially by the Austrian Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung, project P11563-BIO. It was conducted as part of the collaborative research project of the Austrian Academy of Science and the Ministerio del Ambiente y de los Recursos Naturales Renovables in Venezuela. Treatment of birds complied with the current laws of the country in which research was performed (i.e. Venezuela).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Heindl.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Dickinson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heindl, M., Winkler, H. Interacting effects of ambient light and plumage color patterns in displaying Wire-tailed Manakins (Aves, Pipridae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53, 153–162 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-002-0562-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-002-0562-3

Keywords

Navigation