Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of medial shift of supraspinatus tendon on the glenohumeral joint motion—a cadaveric study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Full-thickness retracted massive supraspinatus tears are a challenge for arthroscopic surgeons where multiple options for treatment exist, but medializing the attachment is a relatively easy procedure for which a decision can be taken intraoperatively. We investigate the viability of

Material and methods

Ten freshly thawed cadavers were taken and dissected. The supraspinatus tendon was resected, and then its attachment was progressively medialized. The range of motion (abduction, internal and external rotation) was recorded and compared.

As a result, we noted a statistically significant decrease in abduction, internal and external rotation with progressive medialization of the supraspinatus insertion.

Conclusion

Medialized repair of the supraspinatus can be performed only to an extent beyond which it compromises glenohumeral motion. We noted a statistically significant decrease in ROM with even a 3 mm medialization of the tendon, but the acceptable medialization has to be determined on a case-to-case basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Graph 1
Graph 2
Graph 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett WF (2003) Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness supraspinatus tears (small-to-medium). A prospective study with 2- to 4-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 19:249–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goutallier D, Postel J-M, Van Driessche S, Godefroy D, Radier C (2006) Tension free cuff repairs with excision of macroscopic tendon lesions and muscular advancement: result in a prospective series with limited fatty muscular degeneration. J Shoulder Elb Surg 15:164–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Porcellini G, Castagna A, Cesari E, Merolla G, Pellegrini A, Paladini P (2011) Partial repair of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears: clinical and radiographic evaluations at long-term follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20:1170–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghazanfari A, Henderson DJH, Nourissat G (2017) An arthroscopic humeral medializing repair of the supraspinatus. Arthrosc Tech 6(6):e2211–e2215

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim YK, Jung KH, Won JS, Cho SH (2017) Medialized repair for retracted rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26:1432–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee KW, Moon KH, Ma CH, Lee GS, Yang DS, Choy WS (2018) Clinical and radiologic outcomes after medializing and not medializing rotator cuff tendon attachment site on chronic retracted rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 34:2298–2307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamamoto N, Itoi E, Tuoheti Y, Seki N, Abe H, Minagawa H et al (2007) Glenohumeral joint motion after medial shift of the attachment site of the supraspinatus tendon: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu J, Hughes RE, O’Driscoll SW, An KN (1998) Biomechanical effect of medial advancement of the supraspinatus tendon. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:853–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsen FA III, Kirby RM (1982) Office evaluation and management of shoulder pain. Orthop Clin North Am 13:453–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Poppen NK, Walker PS (1976) Normal and abnormal motion of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:195–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burkhart SS (1995) The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south Texas fence line. Arthroscopy. 11(1):119e123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Green RN, Donaldson OW, Dafydd M, Evans SL, Kulkarni R (2014) Biomechanical study: determining the optimum insertion angle for screw-in suture anchors-is deadman’s angle correct? Arthroscopy. 30(12):1535e1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clevenger TA, Beebe MJ, Strauss EJ, Kubiak EN (2014) The effect of insertion angle on the pullout strength of threaded suture anchors: a validation of the deadman theory. Arthroscopy. 30(8):900e905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mizuki Y, Tamai M, Senjyu T, Tkagishi K (2022) Arthroscopic extreme medialized repair for massive rotator cuff tear: resection of cartilage and subchondral bone over the top of the humeral head. Arthrosc Tech 11(6):e965–e970

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hawkins RJ, Misamore GW, Hobeika PE (1985) Surgery for full-thickness rotator-cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1349–1355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cofield RH, Parvizi J, Hoffmeyer PJ, Lanzer WL, Ilstrup DM, Rowland CM (2001) Surgical repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. A prospective long-term study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83(1):71–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thangarajah T, Lo IK, Sabo MT (2021) Rotator cuff repair techniques: current concepts. J Clin Orthop Trauma 17:149–156

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kessler MA, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P (2003) Reconstruction of big rotator cuff ruptures. A new technique of tendon refixation with the corkscrew suture anchor system. Unfallchirurg 106:826–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Dr. Pallav Mishra and Dr. Jai Aditya. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Dr. Jai Aditya and Dr. Pallav Mishra, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jai Aditya Jhamb.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Institutional Ethical committee clearance was taken before beginning the project.

Informed consent

Not applicable

Consent for publication

All authors give consent for publication and there are no human subjects in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(XLSX 9 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, P., Jhamb, J.A., Goel, P. et al. The effect of medial shift of supraspinatus tendon on the glenohumeral joint motion—a cadaveric study. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 48, 513–520 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-06009-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-06009-z

Keywords

Navigation