Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early versus late physiotherapy following arthroscopic repair of small and medium size rotator cuff tear: a randomized clinical trial

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 09 September 2023

Abstract

Purpose

We compared early and late physiotherapy for patients with small and medium size rotator cuff tears following arthroscopic repair.

Methods

A single-centre, single-blinded, prospective parallel RCT was performed with two arms: early physiotherapy (start within the first week) versus late physiotherapy (start 4 weeks after surgery). Patients with small- to medium-sized isolated full-thickness superior rotator cuff tears were included and followed for 12 months. The primary outcome measures were shoulder function and range of motion (ROM) measured by the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at three months, six months, and 12 months. The other outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) pain and the rotator cuff ultrasound (US) evaluation by the Sugaya classification.

Results

In three and six month follow-ups, CMS was significantly superior in the intervention group compared to controls (P < 0.05). However, only at the three month follow-up between-group difference met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (MCID = 10.4) (59.8 vs. 48.9). The intervention group experienced less pain than controls in the first six months (P < 0.001), and only the three month follow-up was clinically meaningful based on MCID (MCID = 1.4). Moreover, in the first six months, the shoulder ROM favoured the intervention group (P < 0.05). US grading of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus was similar between groups (P = 0.07). One retear occurred in the intervention group and another in the controls, detected by examination and US evaluation.

Conclusion

Following the arthroscopic repair of a small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tear, early physiotherapy showed promising results for pain, function, and range of motion.

Level of evidence: Level I therapeutic

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Nima Bagheri and Mohamad Reza Guity, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Tashjian RZ (2012) Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin Sports Med 31:589–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2012.07.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hajivandi S, Dachek A, Salimi A, Mamaghani HJ, Mirghaderi SP, Dehghani J, Borazjani R, Babaniamansour A, Sarallah R, Javanshir S, Salimi M (2021) Comparison of the separate and combined effects of physiotherapy treatment and corticosteroid injection on the range of motion and pain in nontraumatic rotator cuff tear: a randomized controlled trial. Adv Orthop 2021:6789453. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6789453

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gartsman GM (1998) Arthroscopic management of rotator cuff disease. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 6:259–266. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-199807000-00007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ross D, Maerz T, Lynch J, Norris S, Baker K, Anderson K (2014) Rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a review of current literature. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 22:1–9. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-22-01-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liem D, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P, Habermeyer P (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1770–1776. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.F.00749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DeHaan AM, Axelrad TW, Kaye E, Silvestri L, Puskas B, Foster TE (2012) Does double-row rotator cuff repair improve functional outcome of patients compared with single-row technique? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 40:1176–1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511428866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Longo UG, Carnevale A, Piergentili I, Berton A, Candela V, Schena E, Denaro V (2021) Retear rates after rotator cuff surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:749. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04634-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Le BTN, Wu XL, Lam PH, Murrell GAC (2014) Factors predicting rotator cuff retears: an analysis of 1000 consecutive rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med 42:1134–1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514525336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee BG, Cho NS, Rhee YG (2012) Effect of two rehabilitation protocols on range of motion and healing rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: aggressive versus limited early passive exercises. Arthroscopy 28:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao J, Luo M, Pan J, Liang G, Feng W, Zeng L, Yang W, Liu J (2021) Risk factors affecting rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic repair: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30:2660–2670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Keener JD, Galatz LM, Stobbs-Cucchi G, Patton R, Yamaguchi K (2014) Rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized trial of immobilization compared with early motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:11–19. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.M.00034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Parsons BO, Gruson KI, Chen DD, Harrison AK, Gladstone J, Flatow EL (2010) Does slower rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair lead to long-term stiffness? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:1034–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lo IK, Burkhart SS (2004) Transtendon arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness, articular surface tears of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy 20:214–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazuquin BF, Wright AC, Russell S, Monga P, Selfe J, Richards J (2018) Effectiveness of early compared with conservative rehabilitation for patients having rotator cuff repair surgery: an overview of systematic reviews. Br J Sports Med 52:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-095963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gallagher BP, Bishop ME, Tjoumakaris FP, Freedman KB (2015) Early versus delayed rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed 43:178–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2015.1025683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Denard PJ, Lädermann A, Burkhart SS (2011) Prevention and management of stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: systematic review and implications for rotator cuff healing. Arthroscopy 27:842–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.01.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koo SS, Parsley BK, Burkhart SS, Schoolfield JD (2011) Reduction of postoperative stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: results of a customized physical therapy regimen based on risk factors for stiffness. Arthroscopy 27:155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2010.07.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma P, Maffulli N (2008) Tendinopathy and tendon injury: the future. Disabil Rehabil 30:1733–1745. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701788274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kannus P, Józsa L, Natri A, Järvinen M (1997) Effects of training, immobilization and remobilization on tendons. Scand J Med Sci Sports 7:67–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.1997.tb00121.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Büker N, Kitiş A, Akkaya S, Akkaya N (2011) Comparison of the results of supervised physiotherapy program and home-based exercise program in patients treated with arthroscopic-assisted mini-open rotator cuff repair. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 22:134–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chou CT, Hu W, Wen CS, Wang SF, Lieu FK, Teng JT (2015) Efficacy of informed versus uninformed physiotherapy on postoperative retear rates of medium-sized and large rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:1413–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hayes K, Ginn KA, Walton JR, Szomor ZL, Murrell GA (2004) A randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of physiotherapy after rotator cuff repair. Aust J Physiother 50:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60099-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Karppi P, Ryösä A, Kukkonen J, Kauko T, Äärimaa V (2020) Effectiveness of supervised physiotherapy after arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 29:1765–1774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lisinski P, Huber J, Wilkosz P, Witkowska A, Wytrazek M, Samborski W, Zagloba A (2012) Supervised versus uncontrolled rehabilitation of patients after rotator cuff repair-clinical and neurophysiological comparative study. Int J Artif Organs 35:45–54. https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Longo UG, Berton A, Risi Ambrogioni L, Lo Presti D, Carnevale A, Candela V, Stelitano G, Schena E, Nazarian A, Denaro V (2020) Cost-effectiveness of supervised versus unsupervised rehabilitation for rotator-cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082852

  26. Field LD (2017) Editorial commentary: to move or not to move the shoulder, that is the question. Arthroscopy 33:1149–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.12.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mazuquin B, Bateman M, Realpe A, Drew S, Rees J, Littlewood C (2021) Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: a survey exploring clinical equipoise among surgical members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society. Shoulder & Elbow:17585732211059804. https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732211059804

  28. Longo UG, Risi Ambrogioni L, Berton A, Candela V, Carnevale A, Schena E, Gugliemelli E, Denaro V (2020) Physical therapy and precision rehabilitation in shoulder rotator cuff disease. Int Ortho 44:893–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04511-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 152:726–732. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. DeOrio JK, Cofield RH (1984) Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:563–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res:78–83

  32. Charbonnier C, Chagué S, Kevelham B, Preissmann D, Kolo FC, Rime O, Lädermann A (2018) ArthroPlanner: a surgical planning solution for acromioplasty. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 13:2009–2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1707-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cunningham G, Lädermann A (2011) Tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii: tenotomy versus tenodesis? Leading Opin 2:16–18

    Google Scholar 

  34. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res:160–164

  35. Kukkonen J, Kauko T, Vahlberg T, Joukainen A, Aärimaa V (2013) Investigating minimal clinically important difference for Constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:1650–1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, Powell AP (2009) Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:927–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Beggs IBS, Bueno A European Society of MusculoSkeletal Radiology: musculoskeletal ultrasound technical guidelines I. Shoulder

  38. Barth J, Fotiadis E, Barthelemy R, Genna S, Saffarini M (2015) Ultrasonic evaluation of the repair integrity can predict functional outcomes after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 23:376–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3505-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J (2007) Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:953–960. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.F.00512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Farooqi AS, Lee A, Novikov D, Kelly AM, Li X, JDt K, Parisien RL (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 9:23259671211035106. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211035106

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Arndt J, Clavert P, Mielcarek P, Bouchaib J, Meyer N, Kempf JF (2012) Immediate passive motion versus immobilization after endoscopic supraspinatus tendon repair: a prospective randomized study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:S131–S138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.05.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cuff DJ, Pupello DR (2012) Prospective randomized study of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using an early versus delayed postoperative physical therapy protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:1450–1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.01.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. De Roo PJ, Muermans S, Maroy M, Linden P, Van den Daelen L (2015) Passive mobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is not detrimental in the early postoperative period. Acta Orthop Belg 81:485–492

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Düzgün I, Baltacı G, Atay OA (2011) Comparison of slow and accelerated rehabilitation protocol after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: pain and functional activity. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 45:23–33. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.2011.2386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Düzgün İ, Baltacı G, Turgut E, Atay OA (2014) Effects of slow and accelerated rehabilitation protocols on range of motion after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 48:642–648. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.2014.13.0125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jenssen KK, Lundgreen K, Madsen JE, Kvakestad R, Pripp AH, Dimmen S (2018) No functional difference between three and six weeks of immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Arthroscopy 34:2765–2774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.05.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sheps DM, Bouliane M, Styles-Tripp F, Beaupre LA, Saraswat MK, Luciak-Corea C, Silveira A, Glasgow R, Balyk R (2015) Early mobilisation following mini-open rotator cuff repair: a randomised control trial. Bone Joint J 97:1257–1263. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.97b9.35250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kim YS, Chung SW, Kim JY, Ok JH, Park I, Oh JH (2012) Is early passive motion exercise necessary after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? Am J Sports Med 40:815–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511434287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Klintberg IH, Gunnarsson AC, Svantesson U, Styf J, Karlsson J (2009) Early loading in physiotherapy treatment after full-thickness rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized pilot-study with a two-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil 23:622–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215509102952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Koh KH, Lim TK, Shon MS, Park YE, Lee SW, Yoo JC (2014) Effect of immobilization without passive exercise after rotator cuff repair: randomized clinical trial comparing four and eight weeks of immobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:e44. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.L.01741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA, Shea KP, Apostolakos JM, Solovyova O, Gomlinski G, Wojcik KE, Tafuto V, Stock H, Cote MP (2017) The effect of early range of motion on quality of life, clinical outcome, and repair integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 33:1138–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.10.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Raschhofer R, Poulios N, Schimetta W, Kisling R, Mittermaier C (2017) Early active rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized pilot study. Clin Rehabil 31:1332–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215517694931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sheps DM, Silveira A, Beaupre L, Styles-Tripp F, Balyk R, Lalani A, Glasgow R, Bergman J, Bouliane M (2019) Early active motion versus sling immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy 35:749–760.e742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Tirefort J, Schwitzguebel AJ, Collin P, Nowak A, Plomb-Holmes C, Lädermann A (2019) Postoperative mobilization after superior rotator cuff repair: sling versus no sling: a randomized prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101:494–503. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.18.00773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Saltzman BM, Zuke WA, Go B, Mascarenhas R, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Romeo AA, Forsythe B (2017) Does early motion lead to a higher failure rate or better outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Riboh JC, Garrigues GE (2014) Early passive motion versus immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 30:997–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Chang KV, Hung CY, Han DS, Chen WS, Wang TG, Chien KL (2015) Early versus delayed passive range of motion exercise for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med 43:1265–1273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514544698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mazuquin B, Moffatt M, Gill P, Selfe J, Rees J, Drew S, Littlewood C (2021) Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses. PLOS ONE 16:e0252137. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Littlewood C, Bateman M, Clark D, Selfe J, Watkinson D, Walton M, Funk L (2015) Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Shoulder Elbow 7:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573214567702

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Thomson S, Jukes C, Lewis J (2016) Rehabilitation following surgical repair of the rotator cuff: a systematic review. Physiotherapy 102:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Carpenter JE, Thomopoulos S, Flanagan CL, DeBano CM, Soslowsky LJ (1998) Rotator cuff defect healing: a biomechanical and histologic analysis in an animal model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7:599–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1058-2746(98)90007-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Sharma P, Maffulli N (2005) Basic biology of tendon injury and healing. Surgeon 3:309–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1479-666x(05)80109-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen L, Peng K, Zhang D, Peng J, Xing F, Xiang Z (2015) Rehabilitation protocol after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: early versus delayed motion. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:8329–8338

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.B. and MR.G. contributed to the study conception and design and supervised the project. P.M. and A.M. analyzed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. S.Sh. gathered the data, did assessments, contributed to the study design, and edited the manuscript. SMJ.M. contributed to the study design, revised the manuscript, and drew figures. M.M. did sonographies and edited the manuscript. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and revised it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. S.Sh. and P.M. contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nima Bagheri or Sadula Sharifpour.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Clinical trial registry code: IRCT20210526051412N1, https://www.irct.ir).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was signed by all the participants of the study.

Consent for publication

Patient consent was obtained regarding the publication of data and photographs.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guity, M.R., Mirghaderi, P., Mortazavi, S.J. et al. Early versus late physiotherapy following arthroscopic repair of small and medium size rotator cuff tear: a randomized clinical trial. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 47, 2795–2807 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05924-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05924-5

Keywords

Navigation