Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A critical analysis of use of ChatGPT in orthopaedics

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 10 July 2023

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Hernigou P, Scarlat MM (2023) Two minutes of orthopaedics with ChatGPT: it is just the beginning; it’s going to be hot, hot, hot! Int Orthop 2023(47):1887–1893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05887-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ollivier M, Pareek A, Dahmen J, Kayaalp ME, Winkler PW, Hirschmann MT, Karlsson J (2023) A deeper dive into ChatGPT: history, use and future perspectives for orthopaedic research. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31(4):1190–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein J (2022) Not the last word: ChatGPT can’t perform orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 481(4):651–655. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lum ZC (2022) Can artificial intelligence pass the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery examination? Orthopaedic residents versus ChatGPT.  Clin Orthop Relat Res 481(8):1623–1630. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002704

  5. Merrell LA, Fisher ND, Egol KA (2023) Large Language Models in Orthopaedic Trauma: A Cutting-Edge Technology to Enhance the Field. J Bone Jt Surg. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.00395

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PPR: study conceptualization, methodology, writing of original draft, and software use.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Partha Pratim Ray.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ray, P.P. A critical analysis of use of ChatGPT in orthopaedics. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 47, 2617–2618 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05916-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05916-5

Navigation