Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Chloros GD, Konstantinidis CI, Vasilopoulou A, Giannoudis PV (2023) Peer review practices in academic medicine: how the example of orthopaedic surgery may help shift the paradigm? Int Orthop. [Ahead of Print]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05729-6
Walbot V (2009) Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts? J Biol 8:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/jbiol125
Fernandez-Llimos F, Pharmacy Practice (2020) peer reviewers (2021) Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing? Pharm Pract (Granada) 19:2284. https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284
COVIDSurg Collaborative, GlobalSurg Collaborative (2021) SARS-CoV-2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives: data from an international prospective cohort study. Br J Surg 108:1056–1063. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab101
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Not applicable.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernandez-Llimos, F. Comment on the article: “Peer review practices in academic medicine: how the example of orthopaedic surgery may help shift the paradigm?”. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 47, 1391–1392 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05768-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05768-z