Skip to main content
Log in

In slope-changing osteotomy one millimeter is not one degree: results of an artificial intelligence-automated software analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Anterior closing wedge osteotomies (ACWO) are performed in revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery to correct an excessive posterior tibial slope (PTS).

Purpose

With the help of automated planning software, this study investigates the assumption that 1mm of wedge height gives 1° of slope correction (1:1).

Methods

Fifty patients underwent ACWO, with the wedge height calculated using the 1:1 formula. Pre- and postosteotomy PTS were measured manually, and the achieved post-operative PTS was compared with the target PTS of 5.3° ± 1.9. The X-ray analysis was repeated virtually with the automated software, which also recommended a resection height. These parameters were then compared with the manually obtained parameters.

Results

Using a 1:1 formula, wedge heights of 8.5mm ± 2.3 was resected to achieve a PTS of 4.2° ± 0.32. This showed an overcorrection of 1.6° ± 0.8 from the target slope. This was consistent with the data from the automated software, which recommended a lower wedge height of 7.7mm ± 2.9.

Conclusion

In trans-tubercle ACW, using a wedge height (mm) to slope correction (°) ratio of 1:1 can lead to slight over-correction. Automated software planning is useful for planning correction osteotomies in the sagittal plane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 09 March 2023

    Author name tagging correction. The correct family name should be Bernard de Villeneuve.

References

  1. Li Y, Hong L, Feng H, Wang Q, Zhang H, Song G (2014) Are failures of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction associated with steep posterior tibial slopes? A case control study. Chin Med J (Engl) 127:2649–2653

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Song GY, Zhang H, Zhang J, Liu X, Xue Z, Qian Y, Feng H (2018) Greater static anterior tibial subluxation of the lateral compartment after an acute anterior cruciate ligament injury is associated with an increased posterior tibial slope. Am. J. Sports Med. 46:1617–1623. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518760580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee DW, Kim JG, Cho SI, Kim DH (2019) Clinical outcomes of isolated revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or in combination with anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Am. J. Sports Med. 47:324–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518815888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sonnery-Cottet B, Mogos S, Thaunat M, Archbold P, Fayard JM, Freychet B, Clechet J, Chambat P (2014) Proximal tibial anterior closing wedge osteotomy in repeat revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am. J. Sports Med. 42:1873–1880. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514534938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sonnery-Cottet B, Archbold P, Cucurulo T, Fayard JM, Bortolletto J, Thaunat M, Prost T, Chambat P (2011) The influence of the tibial slope and the size of the intercondylar notch on rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1475–1478. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.93b11.26905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zee MJM, Keizer MNJ, Dijkerman L, van Raaij J, Hijmans JM, Diercks RL (2021) The correlation between posterior tibial slope and dynamic anterior tibial translation and dynamic range of tibial rotation. J Exp Orthop 8:71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00389-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Christensen JJ, Krych AJ, Engasser WM, Vanhees MK, Collins MS, Dahm DL (2015) Lateral tibial posterior slope is increased in patients with early graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43:2510–2514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515597664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dejour D, Saffarini M, Demey G, Baverel L (2015) Tibial slope correction combined with second revision ACL produces good knee stability and prevents graft rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2846–2852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3758-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hees T, Petersen W (2018) Anterior closing-wedge osteotomy for posterior slope correction. Arthrosc Tech 7:e1079–e1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2018.07.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Magnussen RA, Dahm DL, Neyret P (2014) Osteotomy for slope correction following failed ACL reconstruction. In: Marx RG (ed) Revision ACL Reconstruction: Indications and Technique. Springer, New York, New York, NY, pp 221–226

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. DePhillipo NN, Kennedy MI, Dekker TJ, Aman ZS, Grantham WJ, LaPrade RF (2019) Anterior closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomy for slope correction in failed ACL reconstructions. Arthrosc Tech 8:e451–e457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2019.01.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Neyret P, Zuppi G, Aït Si Selmi T (2000) Tibial deflexion osteotomy. Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine 8:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-1872(00)80027-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Quinn CA, Miller MD, Turk RD, Lewis DC, Gaskin CM, Werner BC (2021) Determining the Ratio of wedge height to degree of correction for anterior tibial closing wedge osteotomies for excessive posterior tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 49:3519–3527. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211044136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ho JPY, Merican AM, Hashim MS, Abbas AA, Chan CK, Mohamad JA (2017) Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of the posterior tibial slope in 100 Knees. J Arthroplasty 32:3176–3183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Naendrup JH, Drouven SF, Shaikh HS, Jaecker V, Offerhaus C, Shafizadeh ST, Pfeiffer TR (2020) High variability of tibial slope measurement methods in daily clinical practice: comparisons between measurements on lateral radiograph, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography. Knee 27:923–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2020.01.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lipps DB, Wilson AM, Ashton-Miller JA, Wojtys EM (2012) Evaluation of different methods for measuring lateral tibial slope using magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 40:2731–2736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512461749

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Queiros CM, Abreu FG, Moura JL, de Abreu GV, Vieira TD, Helfer L, Sonnery-Cottet B (2019) Anterior closing-wedge osteotomy for posterior slope correction with tibial tubercle preservation. Arthrosc Tech 8:e1105–e1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2019.05.026

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodriguez AN, Schreier F, Carlson GB, LaPrade RF (2021) Proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy for the treatment of posterior knee instability and genu recurvatum secondary to increased anterior tibial slope. Arthrosc Tech 10:e2717–e2721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2021.08.018

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Micicoi G, Martz P, Jacquet C, Fernandes LR, Khakha R, Ollivier M (2021) High tibial osteotomy with miniaci planning using manual and semiautomated digital measures. Video Journal of Sports Medicine 1:26350254211032968. https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254211032968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Giffin JR, Vogrin TM, Zantop T, Woo SL, Harner CD (2004) Effects of increasing tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee. Am J Sports Med 32:376–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546503258880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrera A, Menetrey J (2022) Optimizing indications and technique in osteotomies around the knee. EFORT Open Rev 7:396–403. https://doi.org/10.1530/eor-22-0057

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu K, Zeng J, Han L, Feng W, Lin X, Zeng Y (2021) Effect of the amount of correction on posterior tibial slope and patellar height in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Orthop. Surg. 29:23094990211049571. https://doi.org/10.1177/23094990211049571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pache S, Del Castillo J, Moatshe G, LaPrade RF (2020) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure and revision surgery: current concepts. Journal of ISAKOS 5:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2020-000457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guy S, Khakha R, Ollivier M (2022) Anterior closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy using patient-specific cutting guide in chronic anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knees. Arthrosc. Tech. 11:e1605–e1612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2022.05.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Holme TJ, Henckel J, Hartshorn K, Cobb JP, Hart AJ (2015) Computed tomography scanogram compared to long leg radiograph for determining axial knee alignment. Acta Orthop 86:440–443. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.1003488

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jacobi M, Villa V, Reischl N, Demey G, Goy D, Neyret P, Gautier E, Magnussen R (2014) Factors influencing posterior tibial slope and tibial rotation in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3100-8

  27. Schröter S, Ihle C, Mueller J, Lobenhoffer P, Stöckle U, van Heerwaarden R (2013) Digital planning of high tibial osteotomy. Interrater reliability by using two different software. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2114-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthieu Ollivier.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the review board.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

MO is an educational consultant for newclip technique. LRF is a chief medical officer for PeekMed.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, C.Z., Abdelhameed, M.A., AlMaeen, B.N. et al. In slope-changing osteotomy one millimeter is not one degree: results of an artificial intelligence-automated software analysis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 47, 915–920 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05676-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05676-8

Keywords

Navigation