Abstract
Purpose
We compared the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed cyst formation rate after meniscal tear repair using a new all-inside suture device (N group) versus the older all-inside suture device (O group).
Methods
Between October 2008 and July 2017, 94 consecutive menisci of 89 patients were diagnosed with meniscal tears and underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair using the all-inside suture device. Five of these patients were lost to follow-up within 12 months and were excluded from the study. The remaining 89 menisci were followed up for at least 12 months and were included in this retrospective cohort study. Older all-inside suture devices (FasT-Fix, Ultra FasT-Fix) were used until December 2012, while the new all-inside suture device (FasT-Fix 360) was used from January 2013 onwards. Meniscal cysts were detected on T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI at 12 months postoperatively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with the use of the new all-inside suture device and cyst formation.
Results
In total, 36 and 53 menisci were included in the N and O groups, respectively. The incidence of meniscal cysts was significantly greater in the O group (14 out of 53, 26.4%) than in the N group (two out of 36, 5.56%) (P = 0.012). Two patients in the O group had symptomatic cysts that required removal. Multivariate logistic analyses showed that the cyst formation risk significantly decreased after using the new all-inside suture device than the older all-inside suture devices (odds ratio = 0.139; P = 0.04).
Conclusions
The MRI-confirmed cyst formation rate after meniscal tear repair was significantly lower using the new than the older all-inside suture devices, indicating that the use of a low-profile device may decrease the cyst formation rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The data and materials of the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- AI:
-
All-inside
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- DLM:
-
Discoid lateral meniscus
- ACL:
-
Anterior cruciate ligament
- OR:
-
Odds ratios
- CI:
-
Confidence intervals
References
Lu KH (2006) Arthroscopic meniscal repair and needle aspiration for meniscal tear with meniscal cyst. Arthroscopy 22(12):1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.087
Yoo JH, Yoon JR, Lee SJ (2008) Parameniscal cyst formation after arthroscopic meniscal repair with biodegradable meniscal arrow: a case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(9):815–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0553-7
Kang HJ, Chun CH, Kim SH, Kim KM (2012) A ganglion cyst generated by non-absorbable meniscal repair suture material. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(5):608–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.12.006
Kimura M, Hagiwara A, Hasegawa A (1993) Cyst of the medial meniscus after arthroscopic meniscal repair. Am J Sports Med 21(5):755–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659302100524
Kulkarni V, Mulford J (2012) Cyst following meniscal repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(11):2197–2199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1803-7
Lombardo S, Eberly V (1999) Meniscal cyst formation after all-inside meniscal repair. Am J Sports Med 27(5):666–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465990270052001
Nagura I, Yagi M, Kokubu T, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2004) Generation of meniscal cyst after arthroscopic meniscal repair. Arthroscopy 20(8):869–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.07.008
Nakamae A, Deie M, Yasumoto M, Kobayashi K, Ochi M (2004) Synovial cyst formation resulting from nonabsorbable meniscal repair devices for meniscal repair. Arthroscopy 20(2):16–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.04.014
Nishino K, Hashimoto Y, Nishida Y, Terai S, Takahashi S, Yamasaki S, Nakamura H (2019) Incidence and risk factors for meniscal cyst after meniscal repair. Arthroscopy 35(4):1222–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.039
Choi NH, Kim BY, Hwang Bo BH, Victoroff BN (2014) Suture versus FasT-Fix all-inside meniscus repair at time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 30(10):1280–1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.023
Seo SS, Kim CW, Lee CR, Park DH, Kwon YU, Kim OG, Kim CK (2020) Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical outcomes of meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of suture and meniscus fixation device. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 40(3):365–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03323-3
Grant JA, Wilde J, Miller BS, Bedi A (2012) Comparison of inside-out and all-inside techniques for the repair of isolated meniscal tears: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 40(2):459–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511411701
Terai S, Hashimoto Y, Yamasaki S, Takahashi S, Shimada N, Nakamura H (2019) Prevalence, development, and factors associated with cyst formation after meniscal repair with the all-inside suture device. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(9):1261–1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03176-w
Haas AL, Schepsis AA, Hornstein J, Edgar CM (2005) Meniscal repair using the FasT-Fix all-inside meniscal repair device. Arthroscopy 21(2):167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.10.012
Kocabey Y, Chang HC, Brand JC Jr, Nawab A, Nyland J, Caborn DN (2006) A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus. Arthroscopy 22(4):406–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.12.009
Kotsovolos ES, Hantes ME, Mastrokalos DS, Lorbach O, Paessler HH (2006) Results of all-inside meniscal repair with the FasT-Fix meniscal repair system. Arthroscopy 22(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.10.017
Popescu D, Sastre S, Caballero M, Lee JW, Claret I, Nuñez M, Lozano L (2010) Meniscal repair using the FasT-Fix device in patients with chronic meniscal lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(4):546–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0926-6
McCauley TR (2005) MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee. Radiology 234(1):53–61
Tingstad EM, Teitz CC, Simonian PT (2001) Complications associated with the use of meniscal arrows. Am J Sports Med 29(1):96–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465010290012201
Erginer R, Yücel I, Oğüt T, Kesmezacar H, Babacan M (2004) Medial meniscus anterior horn cyst: arthroscopic decompression. Arthroscopy 20(2):9–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.04.006
Choi NH, Kim SJ (2004) Meniscal cyst formation after inside-out meniscal repair. Arthroscopy 20(1):E1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.020
Thompson WO, Thaete FL, Fu FH, Dye SF (1991) Tibial meniscal dynamics using three-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic resonance images. Am J Sports Med 19(3):210–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659101900302
Vedi V, Williams A, Tennant SJ, Spouse E, Hunt DM, Gedroyc WM (1999) Meniscal movement. An in-vivo study using dynamic MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(1):37–41. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.81b1.8928
Yao J, Lancianese SL, Hovinga KR, Lee J, Lerner AL (2008) Magnetic resonance image analysis of meniscal translation and tibio-menisco-femoral contact in deep knee flexion. J Orthop Res 26(5):673–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20553
Hoffelner T1, Resch H, Forstner R, Michael M, Minnich B, Tauber M (2011) Arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair–does the meniscus heal? A clinical and radiological follow-up examination to verify meniscal healing using a 3-T MRI Skeletal Radiol 40(2):181-187https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0965-6
Tschirch FT, Schmid MR, Pfirrmann CW, Romero J, Hodler J, Zanetti M (2003) Prevalence and size of meniscal cysts, ganglionic cysts, synovial cysts of the popliteal space, fluid-filled bursae, and other fluid collections in asymptomatic knees on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(5):1431–1436. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.5.1801431
Campbell SE, Sanders TG, Morrison WB (2001) MR imaging of meniscal cysts: incidence, location, and clinical significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:409–413. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.177.2.1770409
De Smet AA, Graf BK, del Rio AM (2011) Association of parameniscal cysts with underlying meniscal tears as identified on MRI and arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(2):W180–W186. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.10.4754
Barrie HJ (1979) The pathogenesis and significance of meniscal cysts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 61(2):184–189. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.61b2.582035
Tasker AD, Ostlere SJ (1995) Relative incidence and morphology of lateral and medial meniscal cysts detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol 50(11):778–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9260(05)83219-2
Tyson LL, Daughters TC Jr, Ryu RK, Crues JV 3rd (1995) MRI appearance of meniscal cysts. Skeletal Radiol 24(6):421–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00941237
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Takuya Kinoshita, Yusuke Hashimoto, Kazuya Nishino, Yohei Nishida, Shinji Takahashi, and Hiroaki Nakamura. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Takuya Kinoshita and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the hospital ethics committee and the internal review board of our institution (3071).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kinoshita, T., Hashimoto, Y., Nishino, K. et al. Comparison of new and old all-inside suture devices in meniscal cyst formation rates after meniscal repair. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 46, 1563–1571 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05375-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05375-4