Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the rate of post-operative dislocation in patients with ipsilateral valgus knee deformity after primary total hip arthroplasty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There is scant literature on the evaluation of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with ipsilateral valgus knee deformity. This study aimed to investigate the post-operative dislocation rate in patients with valgus knee deformity who underwent ipsilateral THA and identify whether ipsilateral valgus knee deformity increases the dislocation rate after THA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with valgus knee deformity who underwent ipsilateral THA in our institution from January 2016 to December 2018. Each hip with ipsilateral valgus knee deformity was matched with a hip without valgus knee deformity according to sex, affected side, and date of surgery. The primary outcome was the dislocation rate after THA. Univariate analyses were initially used to compare data between the dislocation group and the non-dislocation group. Independent risk factors for dislocation were determined using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

There were 257 THAs with ipsilateral valgus knee deformity (valgus knee group) and 257 THAs without valgus knee deformity (control group). The valgus knee group showed a significantly higher dislocation rate than the control group (9.7% versus 1.6%, p < 0.001). Older age (p = 0.020) and malposition of the acetabular cup (p = 0.048) were independent risk factors of post-operative dislocation.

Conclusion

Patients with valgus knee deformity have a higher risk of dislocation after ipsilateral THA. If ipsilateral THA and total knee arthroplasty must be performed successively, total knee arthroplasty may have an earlier priority than THA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

We will present all the data in this article when necessary.

References

  1. Gwam CU, Mistry JB, Mohamed NS, Thomas M, Bigart KC, Mont MA, Delanois RE (2017) Current epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States: national inpatient sample 2009 to 2013. J Arthroplasty 32(7):2088–2092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ding ZC, Xu B, Liang ZM, Wang HY, Luo ZY, Zhou ZK (2020) Limited influence of comorbidities on length of stay after total hip arthroplasty: experience of enhanced recovery after surgery. Orthop Surg 12(1):153–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ding ZC, Zeng WN, Mou P, Liang ZM, Wang D, Zhou ZK (2020) Risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty in patients with crowe type iv developmental dysplasia of the hip. Orthop Surg 12(2):589–600

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rowan FE, Benjamin B, Pietrak JR, Haddad FS (2018) Prevention of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33(5):1316–1324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Malkani AL, Ong KL, Lau E, Kurtz SM, Justice BJ, Manley MT (2010) Early- and late-term dislocation risk after primary hip arthroplasty in the medicare population. J Arthroplasty 25(6 Suppl):21–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozic KJ, Kamath AF, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz S, Chan V, Vail TP, Rubash H, Berry DJ (2015) Comparative epidemiology of revision arthroplasty: failed tha poses greater clinical and economic burdens than failed TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(6):2131–2138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):128–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Q, Cheng X, Yan D, Zhou Y (2019) Plain radiography findings to predict dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Transl 18:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kotwal RS, Ganapathi M, John A, Maheson M, Jones SA (2009) Outcome of treatment for dislocation after primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(3):321–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdel MP, Cross MB, Yasen AT, Haddad FS (2015) The functional and financial impact of isolated and recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 97-b(8):1046–1049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Haidukewych GJ, Boberg CJ (2006) Hospital cost of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(2):290–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Buckland AJ, Puvanesarajah V, Vigdorchik J, Schwarzkopf R, Jain A, Klineberg EO, Hart RA, Callaghan JJ, Hassanzadeh H (2017) Dislocation of a primary total hip arthroplasty is more common in patients with a lumbar spinal fusion. Bone Joint J 99-b(5):585–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saiz AM, Lum ZC, Pereira GC (2019) Etiology, evaluation, and management of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. JBJS Rev 7(7):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gausden EB, Parhar HS, Popper JE, Sculco PK, Rush BNM (2018) Risk factors for early dislocation following primary elective total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33(5):1567-1571 e1562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jämsen E, Puolakka T, Peltola M, Eskelinen A, Lehto MU (2014) Surgical outcomes of primary hip and knee replacements in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a nationwide registry-based case-controlled study. Bone Joint J 96-b(4):486–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lange J, Haas SB (2017) Correcting severe valgus deformity: taking out the knock. Bone Joint J 99-b(1 Supple A):60–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kawaguchi K, Inui H, Taketomi S, Yamagami R, Takagi K, Kage T, Sameshima S, Tanaka S (2021) Rotational kinematics differ between mild and severe valgus knees in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 28:81–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nikolopoulos D, Michos I, Safos G, Safos P (2015) Current surgical strategies for total arthroplasty in valgus knee. World J Orthop 6(6):469–482

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Meding JB, Faris PM, Davis KE (2017) Bilateral total hip and knee arthroplasties: average 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 32(11):3328–3332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo SJ, Zhou YX, Yang DJ, Yang XC (2012) Lower-limb valgus deformity associated with developmental hip dysplasia. Chin Med J 125(22):3956–3960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao HY, Kang PD, Xia YY, Shi XJ, Nie Y, Pei FX (2017) Comparison of early functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty using a direct anterior or posterolateral approach: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 32(11):3421–3428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Harsten A, Kehlet H, Ljung P, Toksvig-Larsen S (2015) Total intravenous general anaesthesia vs. spinal anaesthesia for total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, controlled trial. Acta Anaesth Scand 59(3):298–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS, Rasquinha VJ (2004) Mastering the art of cemented femoral stem fixation. J Arthroplasty 19(4 Suppl 1):85–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60(2):217–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pradhan R (1999) Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(3):431–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wera GD, Ting NT, Moric M, Paprosky WG, Sporer SM, Della Valle CJ (2012) Classification and management of the unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(5):710–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim JT, Kim HS, Lee YK, Ha YC, Koo KH (2020) Total hip arthroplasty with trochanteric ostectomy for patients with angular deformity of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 35(10):2911–2918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maisongrosse P, Lepage B, Cavaignac E, Pailhe R, Reina N, Chiron P, Laffosse JM (2015) Obesity is no longer a risk factor for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with a double-mobility cup. Int Orthop 39(7):1251–1258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weinstein SL (1987) Natural history of congenital hip dislocation (cdh) and hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 225:62–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou X, Wang Q, Zhang X, Chen Y, Shen H, Jiang Y (2012) Effect of pelvic obliquity on the orientation of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(2):299–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Malkani AL, Dilworth B, Ong K, Baykal D, Lau E, Mackin TN, Lee GC (2017) High risk of readmission in octogenarians undergoing primary hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(12):2878–2888

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Esposito CI, Gladnick BP, Lee YY, Lyman S, Wright TM, Mayman DJ, Padgett DE (2015) Cup position alone does not predict risk of dislocation after hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30(1):109–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jørgensen CC, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Solgaard S, Kehlet H (2014) Hip dislocations after 2,734 elective unilateral fast-track total hip arthroplasties: incidence, circumstances and predisposing factors. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(11):1615–1622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McElwain JP, Sheehan JM (1985) Bilateral hip and knee replacement for rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(2):261–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnson KA (1975) Arthroplasty of both hips and both knees in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57(7):901–904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McDonald I (1982) Bilateral replacement of the hip and knee in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64(4):465–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Suman RK, Freeman PA (1986) Bilateral hip and knee replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty 1(4):237–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Basques BA, Toy JO, Bohl DD, Golinvaux NS, Grauer JN (2015) General compared with spinal anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(6):455–461

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Chang CC, Lin HC, Lin HW, Lin HC (2010) Anesthetic management and surgical site infections in total hip or knee replacement: a population-based study. Anesthesiology 113(2):279–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Helwani MA, Avidan MS, Ben Abdallah A, Kaiser DJ, Clohisy JC, Hall BL, Kaiser HA (2015) Effects of regional versus general anesthesia on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(3):186–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mauermann WJ, Shilling AM, Zuo Z (2006) A comparison of neuraxial block versus general anesthesia for elective total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 103(4):1018–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Harsten A, Kehlet H, Toksvig-Larsen S (2013) Recovery after total intravenous general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Br J Anaesth 111(3):391–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Li H, Zeng WN, Ding ZC, Yuan MC, Cai YR, Zhou ZK (2021) Duloxetine reduces pain after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zahar A, Rastogi A, Kendoff D (2013) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 6(4):350–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the 1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (ZYJC18039); and the Regional Innovation & Cooperation program of the Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province (No. 2021YFQ0028).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Jin-Wei Xie, Zi-Chuan Ding, Ming-Cheng Yuan, Ya-Hao Lai, and Zong-Ke Zhou. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Hao Li, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zong-Ke Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the institutional review board.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Xie, JW., Ding, ZC. et al. Evaluation of the rate of post-operative dislocation in patients with ipsilateral valgus knee deformity after primary total hip arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 46, 1507–1514 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05372-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05372-7

Keywords

Navigation