Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pneumatic femoral broaching decreases post-operative subsidence of a cementless taper-wedge stem

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Stem subsidence is a known cause of early failure in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of pneumatic femoral broaching in preventing post-operative subsidence of a proximally porous-coated, taper-wedge stem.

Methods

We reviewed 169 cases of primary THA with a single taper-wedge stem. Eighty THAs performed using pneumatic broaching were compared with 89 THAs performed using manual broaching in terms of postoperative canal fill ratio (CFR) at three levels, stem subsidence at one year post-operation, and stem fixation at latest follow-up (median, 24 months).

Results

The median CFRs were higher in the pneumatic group than in the manual group at all levels (p < 0.05). The median stem subsidence at one year after THA was lower in the pneumatic group than in the manual group (0.2 mm vs. 0.6 mm, p = 0.007). A multivariate analysis determined a decreased CFR at 60 mm below the lesser trochanter and the manual broaching as independent factors affecting post-operative stem subsidence. At the latest follow-up, all stems showed stable fixation by bone ingrowth in both groups.

Conclusion

Our results showed that the pneumatic broaching device was useful in maximizing the mediolateral canal filling and initial stability and minimizing the subsidence of taper-wedge stems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All data and material pertaining to the study are made available upon request.

References

  1. Streit MR, Lehner B, Peitgen DS et al (2020) What is the long-term (27- to 32-year) survivorship of an uncemented tapered titanium femoral component and survival in patients younger than 50 years? Clin Orthop Relat Res 478:1283–1291. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001203

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell D, Nilsson KG, Field JR, Callary SA (2011) Early migration characteristics of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem: an RSA study. Inter Orthop 35:483–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0913-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C (1986) Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:108–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dalton JE, Cook SD, Thomas KA, Kay JF (1995) The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:97–110. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199501000-00012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Warth LC, Grant TW, Naveen NB et al (2020) Inadequate metadiaphyseal fill of a modern taper-wedge stem increases subsidence and risk of aseptic loosening: Technique and distal canal fill matter! J Arthroplasty 35:1868–1876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grant TW, Lovro LR, Licini DJ et al (2017) Cementless tapered wedge femoral stems decrease subsidence in obese patients compared to traditional fit-and-fill stems. J Arthroplasty 32:891–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nazari-Farsani S, Vuopio M, Löyttyniemi E, Aro HT (2021) Contributing factors to the initial femoral stem migration in cementless total hip arthroplasty of postmenopausal women. J Biomech 117:110262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper HJ, Jacob AP, Rodriguez JA (2011) Distal fixation of proximally coated tapered stems may predispose to a failure of osteointegration. J Arthroplasty 26:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kheir MM, Drayer NJ, Chen AF (2020) An update on cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:1646–1661. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ries C, Boese CK, Dietrich F et al (2019) Femoral stem subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective single-centre study. Inter Orthop 43:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4020-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McLaughlin JR (2008) Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1290–1296. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bolland BJRF, New AMR, Madabhushi SPG et al (2007) Vibration-assisted bone-graft compaction in impaction bone grafting of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:686–692. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B5.18695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nizam I, Batra AV, Gogos S, Alva A (2021) Pneumatic femoral broaching in direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty. BMJ Innov. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2020-000536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ et al (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:148–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Imura I (1995) The Japanese Orthopaedic Association: evaluation chart of hip joint functions. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 69:864–867

    Google Scholar 

  16. Laine HJ, Pajamäki KJ, Moilanen T, Lehto MU (2001) The femoral canal fill of two different cementless stem designs. The accuracy of radiographs compared to computed tomographic scanning. Inter Orthop 25:209–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002640100245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishii S, Homma Y, Baba T et al (2016) Does the canal fill ratio and femoral morphology of Asian females influence early radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented proximally coated, tapered-wedge stem? J Arthroplasty 31:1524–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McPherson EJ, Dorr LD, Gruen TA, Saberi MT (1995) Hydroxyapatite-coated proximal ingrowth femoral stems. A matched pair control study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 315:223–230

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kärrholm J, Borssén B, Löwenhielm G, Snorrason F (1994) Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:912–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Ambrosio A, Peduzzi L, Roche O et al (2020) Influence of femoral morphology and canal fill ratio on early radiological and clinical outcomes of uncemented total hip arthroplasty using a fully coated stem. Bone Joint Res 9:182–191. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.94.BJR-2019-0149.R2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Frenzel S, Vécsei V, Negrin L (2015) Periprosthetic femoral fractures–incidence, classification problems and the proposal of a modified classification scheme. Inter Orthop 39:1909–1920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2967-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goossens S, Leuridan S, Pastrav L, et al (2018) Comparison of cementless THA stem insertion using the Woodpecker versus hammer blows by strain and vibrational measurements: an in vitro study. Orthopaedic Proceedings 99-B Suppl 3

  23. Branovacki G, Meininger A, Redondo M, et al (2018) Perioperative complications in total hip arthroplasty when using a pneumatic broaching system for Zweimuller-type, square-taperd hip stems. A Prospective review of 330 cases using stems from eight different manufacturers. Orthopaedic Proceedings 92-B Suppl 1

  24. Al-Najjim M, Khattak U, Sim J, Chambers I (2016) Differences in subsidence rate between alternative designs of a commonly used uncemented femoral stem. J Orthop 13:322–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2016.06.026

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. JP18K09109).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection and analysis were performed by Masanori Fujii and Kenji Kitamura. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Masanori Fujii, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masanori Fujii.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Each author certifies that his institution approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigation was conducted in conformity with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University (No. 30–91).

Consent to participate and publish

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University (No. 30–91).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University Hospital.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fujii, M., Kitamura, K., Ikemura, S. et al. Pneumatic femoral broaching decreases post-operative subsidence of a cementless taper-wedge stem. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 46, 233–240 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05196-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05196-x

Keywords

Navigation