Skip to main content
Log in

The Casuccio-Santacroce-Banfo knee arthroscope: an avant-garde Italian tale in the history of arthroscopy

  • Orthopaedic Heritage
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This brief historical note describes an arthroscopic instrument presented in Italy in 1950, and still preserved to this day at the library of the Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute in Bologna, Italy.

Material and methods

A research on Casuccio, Santacroce, and Banfo prolific scientific collaboration was performed.

Results

The arthroscopic instrument was designed and utilized at the Orthopedic Clinic of the University of Bari, directed by Professor Casuccio, in collaboration with his assistant, Antonio Santacroce, and Giorgio Banfo, an orthopedist, entrepreneur, and owner of a modern establishment dedicated to the production of orthopaedic products and medical instruments.

Conclusion

Much like America and Japan, 1950s Italy offered avant-garde arthroscopic instruments, which resulted from a masterful collaboration of research and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable (historical paper).

References

  1. Santacroce A, Banfo G (1951) Presentazione di uno strumentario per artroscopia. Atti XXXV congresso S.I.O.T Torino

  2. Casuccio C, Specimens of Arthroscopy (1951) Communication au Vme Congres de la Societè internationale de Chirurgie Orthopedique et de Traumatologie. Stockholm May 21–25, 1951

  3. Nordentoft S (1912) Ueber Endoskopie geschlossener Cavitäten mittels meines Trokart-Endoskops. Zentralbl Chir 39:95–97

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobaeus HC (1913) Ueber Laparo- und Thorakoskopie. Kabitzsch, Wurzburg

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bircher E (1921) Die arthroendoskopie. Zentralbl Chir 48:1460–1461

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burman MS, Finkelstein H, Mayer L (1934) Arthroscopy of the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg 16:255–268

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burman MS (1931) Arthroscopy or the direct visualization of joints. An experimental cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg 13:669–695

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kieser C (2000) Ernst Vaubel MD German pioneer in the field of arthroscopy 1902–1989. Unfallchirurg 103(1):93–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson RW (1999) Presidential guest speaker’s address: Quo Venis Quo Vadis: the evolution of arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 15(6):680–685

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vecchione (1947) L’artroscopia (Endoscopia del ginocchio). Arch Ortop 60(3):188–195

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kreuscher PH (1931) Semilunar cartilage disease: a plea for the early recognition by means of the arthroscope and the early treatment of this condition. Illinois Medical Journal 47:290–292

    Google Scholar 

  12. Takagi K (1931) Practical experiences using Takagi’s arthroscope. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 8:132

    Google Scholar 

  13. Takagi K (1939) The arthroscope. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 14:359–441

    Google Scholar 

  14. Watanabe M (1986) Memories of the early days of arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 2:209–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. DeMaio M (2013) Giants of orthopaedic surgery: Masaki Watanabe MD. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(8):2443–2448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kieser CW, Jackson RW (2006) How cold light was introduced to arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 22(4):345–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Santacroce A, Banfo G (1952) Saggi di artroscopia. Ortop Traumat App Mot

  18. Santacroce A, Banfo G (1952) Le possibilità esplorative nell’artroscopia del ginocchio. Atti Accad Pugl Scienze

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ezio Liporesi and Catherine A. Dewar for the support received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AM: conceived the presented idea; have made substantial contributions to study conception and design, acquisition of data, data analysis and interpretation; drafted the manuscript; and revised it critically. ADM: conceived the presented idea; coordinated and supervised manuscript preparation. PT: provided original documentation, and helped shape the research, analysis, and manuscript. AV: provided original documentation and critical feedback. GG: designed figures and contributed to the design and implementation of the research. CF: revised the manuscript critically and gave final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Mazzotti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Not applicable (historical paper).

Consent to participate

Not applicable (historical paper).

Consent for publication

Not applicable (historical paper).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Level of Evidence: V

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazzotti, A., Di Martino, A., Tomba, P. et al. The Casuccio-Santacroce-Banfo knee arthroscope: an avant-garde Italian tale in the history of arthroscopy. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 45, 3277–3282 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05118-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05118-x

Keywords

Navigation