Closed reduction and locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal long bone fractures without intra-operative imaging and fracture table

Abstract

Purpose

Early closed reduction and locked intramedullary (IM) nailing has become the standard treatment for diaphyseal long bone fractures in high income countries. The low and middle income countries (LMICs) are still lagging behind in transiting from open surgical reduction and non-operative modalities to closed reduction due to lack of requisite equipment. However, some surgeons in LMICs are beginning to achieve closed reduction even without the equipment.

Methods

A prospective descriptive study was done on a total of 251 fresh diaphyseal fractures of the humerus, femur and tibia fixed with a locked nail over a 5½-year period. The fractures were grouped into those that had open reduction, closed reduction or reduction with a finger.

Results

Closed reduction was done for 135 (53.8%) fractures belonging to 123 patients. The mean and range of the patients’ ages were 41.33 and 13–81 years, respectively. Males constituted 69.9% and mostly (48%) sustained fractures in motorcycle accident. There was a significant negative association between closed reduction and fracture-to-surgery interval (p < 0.001). Closed reduction also had positive associations with: (i) humerus and tibia fractures (p < 0.001), (ii) middle, distal and segmental fractures (p = 0.025), (iii) retrograde approach to femur fracture nailing (p < 0.001), and (iv) wedge or multifragmentary type femur fractures (p = 0.005).

Conclusion

With constant practice, it is possible to achieve closed reduction of many fresh diaphyseal long bone fractures in spite of the limitations imposed on surgeons in LMICs by poor health systems and grossly inadequate fracture care facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.

    Gellman RE (2016) Fracture care challenges in the austere and humanitarian environments. Curr Trauma Rep 2:100–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-016-0046-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Phillips J, Zirkle LG, Gosselin RA (2012) Achieving locked intramedullary fixation of long bone fractures: technology for the developing world. Int Orthop 36:2007–2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1625-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Winquist RA, Hansen ST, Clawson DK (1984) Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: a report of 520 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:529–539

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wolinsky PR, McCarty E, Shyr Y, Johnson K (1999) Reamed intramedullary nailing of the femur: 551 cases. J Trauma 46:392–399

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gosselin RA, Lavaly DJ (2007) Perkins traction for adult femoral shaft fractures: a report on 53 patients in Sierra Leone. Int Orthop 31:697–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0233-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kamau DM, Gakuu LN, Gakuya EM, Sang EK (2014) Comparison of closed femur fracture: skeletal traction and intramedullary nailing cost-effectiveness. EAOJ 8:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Toivanen JAK, Hirvonen M, Auvinen O, Honkonen SE, Jarvinen TLN, Koivisto AM et al (2000) Cast treatment and intramedullary locking nailing for simple and spiral wedge tibial shaft fractures — a cost benefit analysis. Ann Chir Gynaecol 89:138–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gosselin RA, Heitto M, Zirkle L (2009) Cost-effectiveness of replacing skeletal traction by interlocked intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures in a provincial trauma hospital in Cambodia. Int Orthop (SICOT) 33:1445–1448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0798-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Webb LX, Gristina AG, Fowler HL (1988) Unstable femoral shaft fractures: a comparison of interlocking nailing versus traction and casting methods. J Orthop Trauma 2:10–12

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Johnson KD, Johnston DW, Parker B (1984) Comminuted femoral shaft fractures: treatment by roller traction, cerclage wires and an intramedullary nail, or an interlocking intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1222–1235

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ahmed E (2011) Outcome of SIGN Nail initiative in treatment of long bone fractures in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. East and Central Afr J Surg 16:87–96

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nwagbara IC (2019) Locked intramedullary nailing using the SIGN nailing device. Niger J Clin Pract 22:485–91. http://www.njcponline.com/text.asp?2019/22/4/485/255919. Accessed 3 May 2020

  13. 13.

    Carsen S, Park SS, Simon DA, Feibel RJ (2015) Treatment with the SIGN nail in closed diaphyseal femur fractures results in acceptable radiographic alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:2394–2401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4290-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Feibel RJ, Zirkle LG (2009) Use of interlocking intramedullary tibial nails in developing countries. Tech Orthop 24:233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zirkle LG, Shearer D (2009) SIGN technique for retrograde and antegrade approaches to femur. Tech Orthop 24(4):247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    SIGN Fracture Care International (2016) Technique manual of SIGN IM nail & interlocking screw system insertion & extraction guide. Revision # TM-2016.04.11. SIGN Fracture Care International Richland, WA, USA. www.signfracturecare.org. Accessed 9 April 2020

  17. 17.

    Wu X, Jiang Y (2015) Old fracture. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 53:460–463

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF (2018) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium–2018. J Ortho Trauma 32(Supp 1):S1–S170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Thakur A, Muzzafar K, Ghani A, Haseeb M (2018) Closed intramedullary nailing of acute femoral shaft fracture: reduction with help of bone levers through a small incision without opening fracture site. Int J Res Med Sci 6:817–21. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20180491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gourishankar D (2014) Management of fractures of shaft of femur by closed and open method by IM Kuntsher nailing. MedPulse – Int Med J 1:444–6. http://www.medpulse.in. Accessed 5 May 2020

  21. 21.

    Rohilla R, Singh R, Rohilla S, Magu NK, Devgan A, Siwach R (2011) Locked intramedullary femoral nailing without fracture table or image intensifier. Strat Traum Limb Recon 6:127–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11751-011-0122-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Giri SK, Adhikari BR, Gurung GB, Rc D, Bajracharya AR, Khatri K (2008) Mini-open reduction and intramedullary interlocking nailing of fracture shaft of tibia without an image intensifier. Nepal Med Coll J 10:123–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Liao JC, Hsieh PH, Chuang TY, Su JY, Chen CH, Chen YJ (2014) Mini-open intramedullary nailing of acute femoral shaft fracture: reduction through a small incision without a fracture table. Chang Gung Med J 26:660–668

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tahririan MA, Andalib A (2014) Is there a place for open intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures? Adv Biomed Res 3:157. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.137870

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Moore KL, Dalley AF (1999) Clinically oriented anatomy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    McMinn RMH (1994) Last’s anatomy: Regional and applied. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sheen JR, Garla VV (2020) Fracture healing overview. StatPearls Publishing LLC (NCBI). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551678/. Accessed 9 April 2020

  28. 28

    Bone LB, Johnson KD, Weigelt J, Scheinberg R (1989) Early versus delayed stabilization of femoral fractures: A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg 71-A:336–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Agarwal-Harding KJ, von Keudell A, Zirkle LG, Meara JG, Dyer GSM (2016) Understanding and addressing the global need for orthopaedic trauma care. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98-A:1844–53. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Matityahu A, Elliott I, Marmor M, Caldwell A, Coughlinb R, Gosselin RA (2014) Time intervals in the treatment of fractured femurs as indicators of the quality of trauma systems. Bull World Health Organ 92:40–50. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.120436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Young S, Lie SA, Hallan G, Zirkle LG, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI (2011) Low infection rates after 34,361 intramedullary nail operations in 55 low- and middle-income countries: validation of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) online surgical database. Acta Orthop 82:737–743. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.636680

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are deeply grateful to SIGN Fracture Care International and its founder and president, Dr L. G. Zirkle for the free donation of SIGN implants and training without which this study would not have been possible.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Authors SAA, SUE and AIA, collected the data and wrote the protocol. Authors SAA, SUE and IOA designed the study. Authors IOA and SAA analyzed and interpreted the results. Authors SAA, IOA, OTA and SUE wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Authors ICI, OTA and SUE revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. Authors SUE, IOA and OTA searched for the literatures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Adesope Adesina.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Bowen University Teaching

Hospital, Ogbomoso, Oyo State Nigeria. All patients gave informed consent to be included in the study.

Consent for publication

All patients approved of the authors’ intention to have the study published.

Conflict of interest

The authors acknowledge the fact that the implants used for the patients in this study were manufactured and freely donated by SIGN Fracture Care International.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adesina, S.A., Eyasan, S.U., Amole, I.O. et al. Closed reduction and locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal long bone fractures without intra-operative imaging and fracture table. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05091-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Closed reduction
  • Intra-operative imaging
  • Locked intramedullary nail
  • Fracture table
  • Diaphyseal long bone fracture