Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Charcot Arthropathy of Foot and Ankle: Radiographic and Clinical Patterns with Related Outcomes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Our aim is to retrospectively review and evaluate the patterns of affection of Charcot arthropathy of foot and ankle.

Methods

Two hundred twenty-eight patients (235 feet) with post-acute Charcot were reviewed and classified anatomically through plain radiographs into type I and type II based on single or multiple regions affected, respectively. Type I included ankle, Lisfranc (tarsometatarsal), naviculocuneiform, forefoot, and hindfoot which includes one of the following: talonavicular joint, calcaneocuboid joint, or calcaneus. Type II included peritalar, perinavicular, mid-tarsal Charcot, or any other combination. Both types were further classified into four stages (A, stable with no deformity; B, stable with deformity; C, unstable; and D, deformity/instability with associated mechanical ulcers).

Results

The most common type was type IIC (27.2%) followed by type IID (18.3%), while types IA and IIA represented the least common types (3.4% and 3.8%, respectively). Types IA and IIA were managed conservatively. All patients in types IC, ID, IIB, IIC, and IID and the majority of type IB received fusion surgery to achieve stability and correction of deformity. Type II D had the highest complication rate (30%). Five patients ended up with amputation, and all were stage IID.

Conclusion

Affection of single region has better prognosis than affection of two or more regions. Stage A has the best prognosis and can be managed conservatively provided good diabetes control. Surgery is indicated in all cases of types IC, ID, IIB, IIC, and IID to achieve stability and correction of deformity and prevent complications. Mechanical ulcer (stage D) carries the worst prognosis and highest complication rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Nilsen FA, Molund M, Hvaal KH (2018) High incidence of recurrent ulceration and major amputations associated with charcot foot. J Foot Ankle Surg 57(2):301–304. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Strotman PK, Reif TJ, Pinzur MS (2016) Charcot arthropathy of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int 37(11):1255–1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100716674434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Varma AK (2013) Charcot neuroarthropathy of the foot and ankle: a review. J Foot Ankle Surg 52(6):740–749. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2013.07.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenbaum AJ, DiPreta JA (2015) Classifications in brief: Eichenholtz classification of Charcot arthropathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(3):1168–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4059-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shibata T, Tada K, Hashizume C (1990) The results of arthrodesis of the ankle for leprotic neuroarthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(5):749–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA (1998) Acute Charcot's arthropathy of the foot and ankle. Phys Ther 78(1):74–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/78.1.74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trepman E, Nihal A, Pinzur MS (2005) Current topics review: Charcot neuroarthropathy of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int 26(1):46–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070502600109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schon LC, Easley ME, Weinfeld SB (1998) Charcot neuroarthropathy of the foot and ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 349:116–131. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199804000-00015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanders LJ, Frykberg RG (1991) Diabetic neuropathic osteoarthropathy: the Charcot foot. In: Frykberg RG (ed) The high risk foot in diabetes mellitus. Livingstone, New York

  10. Brodsky J, Chambers R, Kwong P, Wagner F (1986) Patterns of breakdown in the Charcot tarsus of diabetes and relation to treatment. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Foot Ankle 5:353

  11. Johnson J, Klein SE, Brodsky JE (2014) Diabetes. In: Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL (eds) Mann's surgery of the foot and ankle, 9th edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. El-Mowafi H, Abulsaad M, Kandil Y, El-Hawary A, Ali S (2018) Hybrid Fixation for ankle fusion in diabetic charcot arthropathy. Foot Ankle Int 39(1):93–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717735074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. El-Mowafi H, El-Hawary A, Kandil Y (2018) Functional pedal construct achieved by combined operative treatment in peritalar complex Charcot arthropathy: a prospective study of 38 feet. Foot Ankle Surg 24(3):236–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2017.02.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. International Diabetes Federation, IDF Atlas, 9th Edition, 2019. https://diabetesatlas.org/data/en/world/ Accessed 25 June 2020

  15. Wanzou JPV, Sekimpi P, Komagum JO, Nakwagala F, Mwaka ES (2019) Charcot arthropathy of the diabetic foot in a sub-Saharan tertiary hospital: a cross-sectional study. J Foot Ankle Res 12:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-019-0343-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Fabrin J, Larsen K, Holstein PE (2000) Long-term follow-up in diabetic Charcot feet with spontaneous onset. Diabetes Care 23(6):796–800. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.6.796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich RP, Tredwell J, Boulton AJ (2003) Diabetic foot syndrome: evaluating the prevalence and incidence of foot pathology in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites from a diabetes disease management cohort. Diabetes Care 26(5):1435–1438. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.5.1435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers LC, Bevilacqua NJ (2008) The diagnosis of Charcot foot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg.25(1):43–51, vi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2007.10.006

  19. Sella EJ, Barrette C (1999) Staging of Charcot neuroarthropathy along the medial column of the foot in the diabetic patient. J Foot Ankle Surg 38(1):34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1067-2516(99)80086-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pinzur MS, Schiff AP (2018) Deformity and clinical outcomes following operative correction of Charcot foot: a new classification with implications for treatment. Foot Ankle Int 39(3):265–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717742371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Abdelaziz Elghazy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

IRB approval was obtained from Faculty of Medicine-Mansoura University prior to conducting the study.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Level of Evidence: level IV case series 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Mowafi, H., Elghazy, M.A., Kandil, Y.R. et al. Charcot Arthropathy of Foot and Ankle: Radiographic and Clinical Patterns with Related Outcomes. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 45, 2201–2208 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05082-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05082-6

Keywords

Navigation