Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tuberosity union in patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a technical note and exploratory analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to treat complex humerus fractures is increasing, especially in older, osteoporotic patients. Refixation and tuberosity healing are needed to achieve an optimal range of motion (ROM), external rotation, active forward elevation, and patient satisfaction. Proper healing has been reported, however, in only 40–84% of cases. Our study’s aim was to describe a simple, reproducible fixation technique designed to improve tuberosity healing.

Methods

We included 30 patients with acute proximal humerus fractures undergoing RSA (Global Unite Reverse Fracture, DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA) with tuberosity reattachment. The humerus stem was cemented in 24 cases. A standardized suture technique with two fiber tapes was used to reattach tuberosities. Clinical and radiological parameters, which were collected one year post-operatively, included ROM, pain level, Constant scores, subjective shoulder value (SSV), and tuberosity healing.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 79.3 years (± 7; range 65–92), and the tuberosity healing rate was 90.0% (27 of 30). Two patients showed migration (one nonunion, one malunion), and another had complete resorption after an initial period of proper healing. Radiolucent lines around the humerus stem occurred in one case, and three patients had scapular notching. The mean SSV was 86% (± 11; range 60–100), the Constant score was 72 (± 10.3; range 48–92), the active forward flexion was 140° (± 14.3; range 115–165), and external rotation was 23° (± 16.5; range 0–50).

Conclusions

This reattachment technique, which is simple and reproducible, achieved a higher tuberosity healing rate than previously published rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baron JA, Barrett JA, Karagas MR (1996) The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone 18(3 Suppl):209S–213S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baron JA, Karagas M, Barrett J, Kniffin W, Malenka D, Mayor M, Keller RB (1996) Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology 7(6):612–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Karl JW, Olson PR, Rosenwasser MP (2015) The epidemiology of upper extremity fractures in the United States, 2009. J Orthop Trauma 29(8):e242–e244. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kruithof RN, Formijne Jonkers HA, van der Ven DJC, van Olden GDJ, Timmers TK (2017) Functional and quality of life outcome after non-operatively managed proximal humeral fractures. Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 18(4):423–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-017-0468-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L, Massin P (2007) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume 89(4):516–520. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ (2009) Delta III reverse shoulder arthroplasty: radiological outcome for acute complex fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research : OTSR 95(5):325–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L (2009) Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR 95(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2008.09.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Klein M, Juschka M, Hinkenjann B, Scherger B, Ostermann PA (2008) Treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients with the Delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Orthop Trauma 22(10):698–704. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818afe40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reitman RD, Kerzhner E (2011) Reverse shoulder arthoplasty as treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. Am J Orthop 40(9):458–461

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Valenti P, Zampeli F, Ciais G, Kany J, Katz D (2020) The initial treatment of complex proximal humerus fracture affects the outcome of revision with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 44(7):1331–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04612-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wall B, Walch G (2007) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Hand Clin 23(4):425–430, v-vi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2007.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Savin DD, Zamfirova I, Iannotti J, Goldberg BA, Youderian AR (2016) Survey study suggests that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is becoming the treatment of choice for four-part fractures of the humeral head in the elderly. Int Orthop 40(9):1919–1925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3227-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F (2005) Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elb Surg 14(1 Suppl S):147S–161S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lenarz C, Shishani Y, McCrum C, Nowinski RJ, Edwards TB, Gobezie R (2011) Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty appropriate for the treatment of fractures in the older patient? Early observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(12):3324–3331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2055-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Levy JC, Badman B (2011) Reverse shoulder prosthesis for acute four-part fracture: tuberosity fixation using a horseshoe graft. J Orthop Trauma 25(5):318–324. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f22088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J, Boileau P (2011) Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20(1):146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boileau P, Alta TD, Decroocq L, Sirveaux F, Clavert P, Favard L, Chelli M (2019) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures in the elderly: is it worth reattaching the tuberosities? J Shoulder Elb Surg 28(3):437–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jain NP, Mannan SS, Dharmarajan R, Rangan A (2019) Tuberosity healing after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients-does it improve outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 28(3):e78–e91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Torrens C, Alentorn-Geli E, Mingo F, Gamba C, Santana F (2018) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of acute complex proximal humeral fractures: influence of greater tuberosity healing on the functional outcomes. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 26(1):2309499018760132. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018760132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chun YM, Kim DS, Lee DH, Shin SJ (2017) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for four-part proximal humerus fracture in elderly patients: can a healed tuberosity improve the functional outcomes? J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(7):1216–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Garofalo R, Flanagin B, Castagna A, Lo EY, Krishnan SG (2015) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture using a dedicated stem: radiological outcomes at a minimum 2 years of follow-up-case series. J Orthop Surg Res 10:129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0261-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Grubhofer F, Wieser K, Meyer DC, Catanzaro S, Beeler S, Riede U, Gerber C (2016) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute head-splitting, 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. J Shoulder Elb Surg 25(10):1690–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wright JO, Ho A, Kalma J, Koueiter D, Esterle J, Marcantonio D, Wiater JM, Wiater B (2019) Uncemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as initial treatment for comminuted proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 33(7):e263–e269. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American 52(6):1077–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Levigne C, Boileau P, Favard L, Garaud P, Mole D, Sirveaux F, Walch G (2008) Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 17(6):925–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British 86(3):388–395. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cuff DJ, Pupello DR (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(22):2050–2055. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gallinet D, Adam A, Gasse N, Rochet S, Obert L (2013) Improvement in shoulder rotation in complex shoulder fractures treated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sebastia-Forcada E, Cebrian-Gomez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Gil-Guillen V (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23(10):1419–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ (2010) The reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British 92(4):535–539. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B4.22450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ (2006) Grammont reversed prosthesis for acute complex fracture of the proximal humerus in an elderly population with 5 to 12 years follow-up. Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l’appareil moteur 92(6):543–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-1040(06)75911-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Marcheix PS, Bazin I, Vergnenegre G, Mabit C, Charissoux JL (2020) Treatment of cephalotuberosity fractures in elderly patients treated by reverse shoulder prosthesis: a study of functional results in relation to deltoid tension. Int Orthop 44(1):147–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04427-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Frankle MA, Ondrovic LE, Markee BA, Harris ML, Lee WE 3rd (2002) Stability of tuberosity reattachment in proximal humeral hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11(5):413–420. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.126098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Krishnan SG, Reineck JR, Bennion PD, Feher L, Burkhead WZ Jr (2011) Shoulder arthroplasty for fracture: does a fracture-specific stem make a difference? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(12):3317–3323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1919-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Li F, Zhu Y, Lu Y, Liu X, Wu G, Jiang C (2014) Hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures: does a trabecular metal prosthesis make a difference? A prospective, comparative study with a minimum 3-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23(10):1437–1443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Hess.

Ethics declarations

The study design was approved by the local ethics committee (2019–00414), and written consent was obtained from all participants.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individuals described in this case series.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hess, F., Bohnert, L., Jaberg, L. et al. Tuberosity union in patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a technical note and exploratory analysis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 2711–2717 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04831-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04831-3

Keywords

Navigation