Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Intramedullary nailing via suprapatellar approach versus locked plating of proximal extra-articular tibial fractures: a randomized control trial

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Currently, nailing through the suprapatellar approach and minimally invasive plating have been generally accepted in the management of displaced proximal tibial fractures. This investigation was aimed at comparing these two treatment methods in terms of their effectiveness and safety.

Methods

We randomized 328 patients into one of two groups: one underwent intramedullary nailing via the suprapatellar approach (IMN group), while the other underwent locking compressive plate (LCP group) placement. The primary outcome was the Iowa Knee Score at 12 months. The clinical history, amount of intra-operative blood loss, rate of fracture healing, and post-operative complications were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at one, two, three, six and 12 months after surgery.

Results

Follow-up data for a year were available for 152 and 154 patients in the IMN group and LCP group, respectively. No intergroup difference was detected with regard to the Iowa Knee Scores (91 ± 8.2 in the IMN group and 90 ± 7.3 in the LCP group, respectively (p = 0.26)), at 12 months. Duration of operation (83.5 ± 35.3 min), amount of blood loss (55 ± 43 mL), duration of fluoroscopy (53.7 ± 3.9 s), and cases with difficult reduction (n = 46) in the IMN group did not differ significantly from those in the LCP group (80.1 ± 43.6 min; 65 ± 56 mL; 48 ± 12 s; 32) (p < 0.05). The two groups had similar post-operative complications and rate of fracture union, with the pre-injury activity level being restored in most patients. Removal of the implants was performed in 31.6% and 63.0% of the cases in the IMN and LCP groups, respectively, indicating a significant intergroup difference.

Conclusion

Both IMN through the suprapatellar approach and minimally invasive LCP were found to yield no significant intergroup difference of clinical outcomes in the treatment of proximal, extra-articular tibial fractures. However, the requirement of implant removal was more relevant to LCP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Courtbrown CM, Mcbirnie J (1995) The epidemiology of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol 77:417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Freedman EL, Johnson EE (1995) Radiographic analysis of tibial fracture malalignment following intramedullary nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res :25-33

  3. Berven H, Brix M, Izadpanah K, Kubosch EJ, Schmal H (2018) Comparing case-control study for treatment of proximal tibia fractures with a complete metaphyseal component in two centers with different distinct strategies: fixation with Ilizarov frame or locking plates. J Orthop Surg Res 13:121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Naik MA, Arora G, Tripathy SK, Sujir P, Rao SK (2013) Clinical and radiological outcome of percutaneous plating in extra-articular proximal tibia fractures: a prospective study. Injury 44:1081–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wenger D, Petersson K, Rogmark C (2018) Patient-related outcomes after proximal tibial fractures. Int Orthop :1-7

  6. Althausen PL, Neiman R, Finkemeier CG, Olson SA (2015) Incision placement for intramedullary tibial nailing: an anatomic study. J Orthop Trauma 16:687–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Attal R, Kirjavainen M, Bail H, Hammer TO, Rosenberger R, Höntzsch D, Rommens PM (2012) A multicentre case series of tibia fractures treated with the Expert Tibia Nail (ETN). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:975–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beltran MJ, Collinge CA, Patzkowski JC, Masini BD, Blease RE, Hsu JR (2012) Intra-articular risks of suprapatellar nailing. Am J Orthop 41:546

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bono CM, Levine RG, Rao JP, Behrens FF (2001) Nonarticular proximal tibia fractures: treatment options and decision making. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 9:176–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hiesterman TG, Shafiq BX, Cole PA (2011) Intramedullary nailing of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurylo JC, Rd TP (2013) Extra-articular proximal tibial fractures: nail or plate? Instr Course Lect 62:61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhandari M, Audige L, Ellis T, Hanson B (2003) Operative treatment of extra-articular proximal tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma 17:591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. JongKeon S, Dipit H, JinHo JW, ChangWug (2010) Technical pitfall while reducing the mismatch between LCP PLT and upper end tibia in proximal tibia fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tytherleighstrong GM, Keating JF, Courtbrown CM (1997) Extra-articular fractures of the proximal tibial diaphysis: their epidemiology, management and outcome. J R Coll Surg Edinb 42:334–338

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Krettek C, Gerich T, Miclau T (2001) A minimally invasive medial approach for proximal tibial fractures. Injury-international Journal of the Care of the Injured 32:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindvall E, Sanders RT (2009) Intramedullary nailing versus percutaneous locked plating of extra-articular proximal tibial fractures: comparison of 56 cases. J Orthop Trauma 23:485–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mueller CA, Eingartner C, Schreitmueller E, Rupp S, Goldhahn J, Schuler F, Weise K, Pfister U, Suedkamp NP (2005) Primary stability of various forms of osteosynthesis in the treatment of fractures of the proximal tibia. Bone Joint J 87:426–432

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim JJ, Noh KM, Cho WS, Kim YT, Kim KY (1997) A technique for intramedullary nailing of proximal third tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma 11:218–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mcconnell T, Rd TP, Tilzey J, Casey D (2001) Tibial portal placement: the radiographic correlate of the anatomic safe zone. J Orthop Trauma 15:207–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weninger P, Tschabitscher M, Traxler H, Pfafl V, Hertz H (2010) Influence of medial parapatellar nail insertion on alignment in proximal tibia fractures--special consideration of the fracture level. J Trauma 68:975–979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Franke J, Hohendorff B, Alt V, Thormann U, Schnettler R (2016) Suprapatellar nailing of tibial fractures–indications and technique. Injury-international Journal of the Care of the Injured 47:495–501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Khatibi H, Jah AAE, Zaeem MMS, Moghaddam AK (2006) Knee and ankle function after displaced non-isolated fractures of the tibial shaft, a retrospective comparison between plate fixation and intramedullary nailing. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 16:140–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-005-0056-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krieg JC (2003) Proximal tibial fractures: current treatment, results, and problems. Injury-international Journal of the Care of the Injured 34:S2–S10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Laflamme GY, Heimlich D, Stephen D, Kreder HJ, Whyne CM (2003) Proximal tibial fracture stability with intramedullary nail fixation using oblique interlocking screws. J Orthop Trauma 17:496–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nork SE, Barei DP, Schildhauer TA, Agel J, Holt SK, Schrick JL, Sangeorzan BJ (2006) Intramedullary nailing of proximal quarter tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma 20:523–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stannard JP, Wilson TC, Volgas DA, Alonso JE (2003) Fracture stabilization of proximal tibial fractures with the proximal tibial LISS: early experience in Birmingham, Alabama (USA). Injury 34:S36–S42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Meena RC, Meena UK, Gupta GL, Gahlot N, Gaba S (2015) Intramedullary nailing versus proximal plating in the management of closed extra-articular proximal tibial fracture: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma 16:203–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Court-Brown CM, Keating JF, Mcqueen MM (1992) Infection after intramedullary nailing of the tibia. Incidence and protocol for management. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:770–774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dunbar RP, Nork SE, Barei DP, Mills WJ (2005) Provisional plating of type III open tibia fractures prior to intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 19:415–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoon RS, Jesse B, Marcus MS, Donegan DJ, Bergmann KA, Siebler JC, Mir HR, Liporace FA (2015) Outcomes following combined intramedullary nail and plate fixation for complex tibia fractures: a multi-centre study. Injury-international Journal of the Care of the Injured 46:1097–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Puloski S, Romano C, Buckley R, Powell J (2004) Rotational malalignment of the tibia following reamed intramedullary nail fixation. J Orthop Trauma 18:397–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gelbke MK, Coombs D, Powell S, Dipasquale TG (2010) Suprapatellar versus infra-patellar intramedullary nail insertion of the tibia: a cadaveric model for comparison of patellofemoral contact pressures and forces. J Orthop Trauma 24:665–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Boldin C, Fankhauser F, Hofer HP, Szyszkowitz R (2006) Three-year results of proximal tibia fractures treated with the LISS. Clin Orthop Relat Res 445:222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cole PA, Zlowodzki M, Kregor PJ (2004) Treatment of proximal tibia fractures using the less invasive stabilization system: surgical experience and early clinical results in 77 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18:528

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 11602093, and 11432016).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Long Cheng, Yan-Hui Li and Dong Zhu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Trauma, the First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China

    Long Cheng, Guang Yang, Dong Zhu & Lei Tan

  2. Department of Cardiology and Echocardiography, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China

    Yan-Hui Li

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 136461, China

    Yan Chu

Authors
  1. Long Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yan-Hui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yan Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lei Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Tan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, L., Li, YH., Chu, Y. et al. Intramedullary nailing via suprapatellar approach versus locked plating of proximal extra-articular tibial fractures: a randomized control trial. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 45, 1599–1608 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04821-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04821-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation