Abstract
Purpose
In this study, we performed a comparison between open calcaneoplasty through transtendinous approach and endoscopic calcaneoplasty for Haglund’s disease.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed of patients who had undergone either a calcaneoplasty with transtendinous approach or endoscopic for Haglund’s disease from three centres. Inclusion criteria were patients with Haglund’s disease confirmed radiographically, neutral alignment of the hindfoot and at least one year of follow-up. Patients were excluded in case of ipsilateral ankle osteoarthritis or other neighbouring joints, previous foot surgery, hindfoot malalignment and marked calcific insertional Achilles tendinosis. A chart review was performed to collect demographic data, including age, sex and body mass index (BMI). Functional outcome analysis included the Foot Function Index, AOFAS score and VAS for pain pre-operatively and post-operatively at the last follow-up. This patient-reported outcome scores were used in the native language of each patient (Italian).
Results
Clinical and functional outcomes were collected from 54 patients (28 heels treated by open technique and 26 heels treated by endoscopic technique). In the open group, the AOFAS score improved from a pre-operative value of 65.67 ± 10.09 points to a value of 91.78 ± 9.67 points at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). In the endoscopic group, the AOFAS score improved from a pre-operative value of 66.69 ± 7.19 points to a value of 93.69 points ± 10.04 at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). The VAS and the FFI (Disability and Pain) scores were also improved significantly in both groups at the final follow-up evaluation (P < 0.001). Comparing the final follow-up post-operative clinical scores between the two groups, there was no difference in the AOFAS, VAS or the FFI scores between the two groups. No major complications were recorded, except for one Achilles tendon tear after open calcaneoplasty. The satisfaction rate was similar for both techniques.
Conclusions
Both techniques provided good clinical outcomes with a low rate of complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Haglund P (1997) Beitrag zur klinik der Achilles tendon. Z Orthop Chir 49:49
Georgiannos D, Kitridis D, Bisbinas I (2018) Dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy for the treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy: a technical tip to optimize its results and reduce complications. Foot Ankle Surg 24:115–118
Labib SA, Pendleton AM (2012) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty: an improved technique. J Surg Orthop Adv 21:176–180
Vaishya R, Agarwal AK, Azizi AT, Vijay V (2016) Haglund’s syndrome: a commonly seen mysterious condition. Cureus 8:e820
Tu P (2018) Heel pain: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 97:86–93
Reinherz RP, Smith BA, Henning KE (1990) Understanding the pathologic Haglund’s deformity. J Foot Surg 29:432–435
Kang S, Thordarson DB, Charlton TP (2012) Insertional Achilles tendinitis and Haglund’s deformity. Foot Ankle Int 33:487–491
Maffulli N, Via AG, Oliva F (2015) Chronic Achilles tendon disorders: tendinopathy and chronic rupture. Clin Sports Med 34:607–624
Hardy A, Rousseau R, Issa SP, Gerometta A, Pascal-Moussellard H, Granger B, Khiami F (2018) Functional outcomes and return to sports after surgical treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy: surgical approach tailored to the degree of tendon involvement. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:719–723
Lohrer H, Arentz S (2003) Distal anterior Achilles tendon impingement lesion corresponding to retrocalcaneal bursitis and Haglund’s syndrome. Sportverletz Sportschaden 17:181–188
Sammarco GJ, Taylor L (1998) Operative management of Haglund’s deformity in the nonathlete: a retrospective study. Foot Ankle Int 19:724–729
Schneider W, Niehus W, Knahr K (2000) Haglund’s syndrome: disappointing results following surgery - a clinical and radiographic analysis. Foot Ankle Int 21:26–30
Baumbach SF, Braunstein M, Mack MG, Maßen F, Böcker W, Polzer S, Polzer H (2017) Insertional Achilles tendinopathy: differentiated diagnostics and therapy. Unfallchirurg 120:1044–1053
Ohtori S, Inoue G, Mannoji C, Saisu T, Takahashi K, Mitsuhashi S, Wada Y, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Moriya H (2001) Shock wave application to rat skin induces degeneration and reinnervation of sensory nerve fibres. Neurosci Lett 315:57–60
Wang CJ, Wang FS, Yang KD, Weng LH, Hsu CC, Huang CS, Yang LC (2003) Shock wave therapy induces neovascularization at the tendon–bone junction. A study in rabbits. J Orthop Res 21:984–989
Jerosch J, Nasef NM (2003) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty - rationale, surgical technique, and early results: a preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:190–195
Ettinger S, Razzaq R, Waizy H, Claassen L, Daniilidis K, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Plaass C (2016) Operative treatment of the insertional Achilles tendinopathy through a transtendinous approach. Foot Ankle Int 37:288–293
Xu JH, Ding SL, Chen B, Wu SC (2018) Modified Bunnell suture expands the surgical indication of the treatment of Haglund’s syndrome heel pain with endoscope. Exp Ther Med 15:4817–4821
Vernois J, Redfern D, Ferraz L, Laborde J (2015) Minimally invasive surgery osteotomy of the hindfoot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 32:419–434
Caudell GM (2017) Insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 34:195–205
Sergio F, Catani O, Fusini F, Langella F, Cautiero G, Ponzo I, Zanchini F (2018) Treating Haglund’s deformity with percutaneous Achilles tendon decompression: a case series. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 8:488–494
Van Dijk CN, Dyk E, Scholten PE, Kort NP (2001) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty. Am J Sports Med 29:185–189
Watson AD, Anderson RB, Davis WH (2000) Comparison of results of retrocalcaneal decompression for retrocalcaneal bursitis and insertional Achilles tendinosis with calcific spur. Foot Ankle Int 21:638–642
Van Dijk CN, Scholten PE, Krips R (2000) A 2-portal endoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of posterior ankle pathology. Arthroscopy 16:871–876
Leitze Z, Sella EJ, Aversa JM (2003) Endoscopic decompression of the retrocalcaneal space. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A:1488–1496
Ortmann FW, McBryde AM (2007) Endoscopic bony and soft tissue decompression of the retrocalcaneal space for the treatment of Haglund deformity and retrocalcaneal bursitis. Foot Ankle Int 28:149–153
Martinelli N, Scotto GM, Sartorelli E, Bonifacini C, Bianchi A, Malerba F (2014) Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Italian version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot and ankle diseases. Qual Life Res 23:277–284
Leigheb M, Janicka P, Andorno S, Marcuzzi A, Magnani C, Grassi F (2016) Italian translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the “American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society’s (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale”. Acta Biomed 87:38–45
Vega J, Baduell A, Malagelada F, Allmendinger J, Dalmau-Pastor M (2018) Endoscopic Achilles tendon augmentation with suture anchors after calcaneal exostectomy in Haglund syndrome. Foot Ankle Int 39:551–559
Phisitkul P (2012) Endoscopic surgery of the Achilles tendon. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 5:156–163
Lughi M (2020) Haglund’s syndrome: endoscopic or open treatment? Acta Biomed 91:167–171
Jerosch J, Sokkar S, Ducker M, Donner A (2012) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty (ECP) in Haglund’s syndrome. Indication, surgical technique, surgical findings and results. Z Orthop Unfall 150:250–256
Chimenti RL, Cychosz CC, Hall MM, Phisitkul P (2017) Current concepts review update: insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Int 38:1160–1169
Kaynak G, Ogut T, Yontar NS, Botanlioglu H, Can A, Unlu MC (2013) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty: five-year results. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 47:261–265
Appala Raju S, Rajasekhara Rao G, Vijayabhushanam M, Venkateswara Rao M, Anil B (2015) Comparison of open versus endoscopic calcaneoplasty for Haglund’s deformity: a short term analysis. J Evolut Med Dental Sci 4:1930–1934
Wiegerinck JI, Kok AC, Van Dijk CN (2012) Surgical treatment of chronic retrocalcaneal bursitis. Arthroscopy 28:283–293
Javali V, Reddy VN (2017) Haglund’s disease: surgical outcome of calcaneal osteotomy. Int J Res Orthop 3:278–281
Jerosch J, Schunck J, Sokkar SH (2007) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty (ECP) as a surgical treatment of Haglund’s syndrome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:927–934
Lin C, Ma L, Chen W, Tao X, Yuan CS, Zhou BH, Tang KL (2017) A comparative study of the calcaneal closing-wedge calcaneal osteotomy versus posterior-superior prominence removal in both sides with Haglund syndrome. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 97:2733–2736
Schepsis AA, Wagner C, Leach RE (1994) Surgical management of Achilles tendon overuse injuries: a long-term follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 22:611–619
Roth KE, Mueller R, Schwand E, Maier GS, Schmidtmann I, Sariyar M, Maus U (2014) Open versus endoscopic bone resection of the dorsolateral calcaneal edge: a cadaveric analysis comparing three dimensional CT scans. J Foot Ankle Res 7:56
Scholten PE, Van Dijk CN (2006) Endoscopic calcaneoplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 11:439–446
Syed TA, Perera A (2016) A proposed staging classification for minimally invasive management of Haglund’s syndrome with percutaneous and endoscopic surgery. Foot Ankle Clin 21:641–664
Lohrer H, Nauck T, Dorn NV, Konerding MA (2006) Comparison of endoscopic and open resection for Haglund tuberosity in a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int 27:445–450
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cusumano, A., Martinelli, N., Bianchi, A. et al. Transtendinous approach calcaneoplasty versus endoscopic calcaneoplasty for Haglund’s disease. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 45, 225–231 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04761-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04761-0