Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complications of computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: retrospective cohort of eight hundred and seventy eight consecutive knees

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The main objective was to analyze the computer-assisted navigation (CAN)-specific complications that forced to switch to conventional procedure in primary total knee replacement (TKR). The secondary objective was to determine the influence of those complications on TKR short-term survival.

Methods

Retrospective study of 878 primary TKR in 753 patients. Two consecutive versions of the OrthoPilot navigation system (Braun Aesculap, Germany) were used during the study time. Specific complications of CAN were defined as those due to the instrumentation (hardware or software failures), which were classified in one of two categories according to whether they occurred during the registration or tracking process.

Results

There were 20 (2.3%) complications related to the navigation system use that forced to switch to conventional surgery: in 11 (1.2%) knees due to loosening of the tracking pins, and in the other nine (1.0%) there were information system failures. There was a trend for a higher conversion rate to conventional surgery with the use of the first version of the software. There were no fractures, infections, or nerve injuries at the pin site. We found no differences in the distribution of baseline variables among those with or without conversion to conventional surgery. There was no significant difference (p = 0.488) in the two year survival between patients with or without conversion.

Conclusion

CAN for primary TKR is a safe method with few specific complications that forced to switch from the navigated to the conventional procedure. Conversion to conventional surgery did not affect the short-term survival of TKR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boylan M, Suchman K, Vigdorchik J, Slover J, Bosco J (2018) Technology-assisted hip and knee arthroplasties: an analysis of utilization trends. J Arthroplast 33:1019–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buza JA 3rd, Wasterlain AS, Thakkar SC, Meere P, Vigdorchik J (2017) Navigation and robotics in knee arthroplasty. JBJS Rev 5: 01874474-201702000-00001. doi: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.16.00047

  3. Cip J, Obwegeser F, Benesch T, Bach C, Ruckenstuhl P, Martin (2018) A.twelve-year follow-up of navigated computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized comparative trial. J Arthroplast 33:1404–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Panjwani TR, Mullaji A, Doshi K, Thakur H (2019) Comparison of functional outcomes of computer-assisted vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality, prospective studies. J Arthroplast 34:586–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A (2007) Complications of fixed infrared emitters in computer assisted total knee arthroplasties. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:71. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Beldame J, Boisrenoult P, Beaufils P (2010) Pin track induced fractures around computer-assisted TKA. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2009.12.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown MJ, Matthews JR, Bayers-Thering MT, Phillips MJ, Krackow KA (2017) Low incidence of postoperative complications with navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 32:2120–2126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamara E, Berliner ZP, Hepinstall MS, Cooper HJ (2017) Pin site complications associated with computer-assisted navigation in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 32(9):2842–2846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Owens RF Jr, Swank ML (2010) Low incidence of postoperative complications due to pin placement in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 25:1096–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.07.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas A, Pemmaraju G, Nagra G, Bassett J, Deshpande S (2015) Complications resulting from tracker pin-sites in computer navigated knee replacement surgery. Acta Orthop Belg 81:708–712

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Khakha RS, Chowdhry M, Norris M, Kheiran A, Chauhan SK (2015) Low incidence of complications in computer assisted total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective review of 1596 cases. Knee 22:416–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2015.02.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gholson JJ, Duchman KR, Otero JE, Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Callaghan JJ (2017) Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: rates of adoption and early complications. J Arthroplast 32:2113–2119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dyrhovden GS, Fenstad AM, Furnes O, Gøthesen Ø (2016) Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up. Acta Orthop 87:592–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1244884

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. d’Amato M, Ensini A, Leardini A, Barbadoro P, Illuminati A, Belvedere C (2019) Conventional versus computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: comparison at ten years follow-up. Int Orthop 43:1355–1363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4114-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sciberras NC, Almustafa M, Smith BRK, Allen DJ, Picard F, Deakin AH (2016) A randomized controlled trial to compare component placement in navigated total knee arthroplasty using original and streamlined registration processes. Arthroplasty Today 3:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.07.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jenny JY, Miehlke RK, Giurea A (2008) Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. Knee 15:80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2007.12.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones CW, Jerabek SA (2018) Current role of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 33:1989–1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ouanezar H, Franck F, Jacquel A, Pibarot V, Wegrzyn J (2016) Does computer-assisted surgery influence survivorship of cementless total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis? A 10-year follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3448–3456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4112-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Manzotti A, Confalonieri N, Pullen C (2008) Intra-operative tibial fracture during computer assisted total knee replacement: a case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:493–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0485-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Massai F, Conteduca F, Vadala A, Iorio R, Basiglini L, Ferretti A (2010) Tibial stress fracture after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 11:123–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-010-0096-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoke D, Jafari SM, Orozco F, Ong A (2011) Tibial shaft stress fractures resulting from placement of navigation tracker pins. J Arthroplast 26:504.e5–504.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jung KA, Lee SC, Ahn NK, Song MB, Nam CH, Shon OJ (2011) Delayed femoral fracture through a tracker pin site after navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 26:505.e9–505.11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bonutti P, Dethmers D, Stiehl JB (2008) Case report: femoral shaft fracture resulting from femoral tracker placement in navigated TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1499–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0150-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Edgerton BC, An KN, Morrey BF (1990) Torsional strength reduction due to cortical defects in bone. J Orthop Res 8:851–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100080610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuo RF (1991) The effect of defect size on the stress concentration and fracture characteristics for a tubular torsional model with transverse hole. J Biomech 24:147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(91)90359-u

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Berning ET, Fowler RM (2011) Thermal damage and tracker-pin track infection in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 26:977.e21–977.e24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Denia Hospital, Partida Beniadla n/n, 03700, Alicante, Spain

    Carlos Daniel Novoa-Parra, R. Sanjuan-Cerveró & N. Franco-Ferrando

  2. Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Av. Gran Vía del Este, 80, 28031, Madrid, Spain

    R. Larrainzar-Garijo

  3. Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Inmaculada Hospital, St. Dr. Alejandro Otero, 8, 18004, Almería, Spain

    G. Egea-Castro

  4. Faculty of Medicine, Miguel Hernandez University, Av. Universitat d’Elx, s/n, 03202, Elche, Spain

    A. Lizaur-Utrilla

Authors
  1. Carlos Daniel Novoa-Parra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Sanjuan-Cerveró
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. Franco-Ferrando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Larrainzar-Garijo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G. Egea-Castro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Lizaur-Utrilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Daniel Novoa-Parra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required by the institutional review board.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Novoa-Parra, C.D., Sanjuan-Cerveró, R., Franco-Ferrando, N. et al. Complications of computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: retrospective cohort of eight hundred and seventy eight consecutive knees. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 2621–2626 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04675-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04675-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation