Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multilevel extended posterior column osteotomy plus unilateral cage strutting for degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To explore the surgical outcome of patients with degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis who underwent multilevel extended posterior column osteotomy (PCO) plus unilateral cage strutting (UCS).

Methods

From Jan 2012 to Aug 2017, 23 patients with degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis who underwent multilevel extended PCO plus UCS technique (study group) and 13 patients who underwent asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) technique (control group) were retrospectively reviewed; the radiological features, including coronal/sagittal deformity, and clinical evaluation including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores-lumbar were assessed before surgery and at follow-up.

Results

All patients underwent the operation successfully. There was no difference in fusion level, blood loss, and follow-up duration between the two groups; the operation time and length of hospital stay were shorter in study group than that in control group. All patients achieved significant correction of both scoliotic and kyphotic deformity and maintained the correction at minimum of two year follow-up, without any difference in deformity correction and correction loss between the two groups. All patients got back pain and leg pain alleviation and neurological function improvement at two year follow-up, without any difference between the two groups. The incidence of complications was lower in study group than that in control group.

Conclusion

Multilevel extended PCO plus UCS procedure could achieve significant correction of scoliosis and kyphosis in the treatment of degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis, presenting less surgery time, lower incidence of complication, and shorter hospital stay when compared with the asymmetric PSO technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hasegawa K, Homma T (2003) One-stage three-dimensional correction and fusion: a multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion procedure for degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis. Tech Note J Neurosurg 99(1 Suppl):125–131

    Google Scholar 

  2. Raman T, Passias PG, Kebaish KM (2019) Asymmetric three-column osteotomy for coronal malalignment in adult patients with prior thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: three-year follow-up. World Neurosurg 131:e441–e446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsumura A, Namikawa T, Kato M (2017) Posterior corrective surgery with a multilevel transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and a rod rotation maneuver for patients with degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine 26(2):150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shi B, Zhao Q, Xu L (2018) SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy for congenital thoracolumbar kyphosis: a minimum of 2 years follow-up study. Spine J 18(11):2059–2064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E (2015) The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification. Neurosurgery 76(suppl 1):S33–S41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cecchinato R, Berjano P, Aguirre MF (2015) Asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the lumbar spine in combined coronal and sagittal imbalance. Eur Spine J 24(S1):S66–S71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Suzuki S, Fujita N, Hikata T (2017) Asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy for progressive kyphoscoliosis caused by a pediatric chance fracture: a case report. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 12:8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Toyone T, Shiboi R, Ozawa T (2012) Asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy for rigid degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(21):1847–1852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan AK, Lau D, Osorio JA (2019) Asymmetric pedicle subtraction osteotomy for adult spinal deformity with coronal imbalance: complications, radiographic and surgical outcomes. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown):opz106. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz106

  10. Buchowski JM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG (2007) Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment. Spine 32:2245–2252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gill JB, Levin A, Burd T (2008) Corrective osteotomies in spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2509–2520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barrey C, Perrin G, Michel F (2014) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the lumbar spine: indications, technical aspects, results and complications. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(Suppl 1):S21–S30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bridwell KH (2006) Decision making regarding Smithe-Petersen vs. pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs. vertebral column resection for spinal deformity. Spine J 31:S171–S178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, McEnery KW (1995) Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Spine 20:1410–1418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cho KJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG (2009) Comparison of Smith-Petersen versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine 34:785–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Seki S, Yahara Y, Makino H (2019) Differential rod contouring on thoracolumbar/lumbar curvature in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an analysis with intraoperative acquisition of three-dimensional imaging. J Orthop Sci 24(5):780–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Uribe JS, Schwab F, Mundis GM (2018) The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy and anterior column realignment classification. J Neurosurg Spine 29(5):565–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E (2014) The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification. Neurosurgery 74(1):112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G (2015) Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.J. Spine Surg 1(1):2–18

    Google Scholar 

  20. de Kunder SL, van Kuijk SMJ, Rijkers K (2017) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J 17(11):1712–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We certify that this manuscript is a unique submission and is not being considered for publication, in part or in full, with any other source in any medium.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weishi Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Li, W. Multilevel extended posterior column osteotomy plus unilateral cage strutting for degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 1375–1383 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04632-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04632-8

Keywords

Navigation