Abstract
Background
External calibration markers (ECM) are the standard of care for digital templating in joint replacements. Spherical mono markers are known to be unreliable. Fixed calibration factors (FCF) can reduce the overall error by placement of markers, but do not address individual patient anatomy. Dual scale calibration marker (DSCM) methods were developed to improve precision of calibration but require two markers. This prospective observational study is the first to analyse the application of a dual scale type single marker (DSSM) method in supine radiographs.
Methods
One hundred patients with unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) underwent anterior-posterior pelvis X-ray with ECM and DSSM. The femoral THA head components were used as internal reference (ICM). An empirical fixed calibration factor (FCF; 120%) was used as comparator. Absolute differences of ICM and both ECM and DSSM were calculated. Absolute relative deviations (ARD) were calculated.
Results
Mean absolute calibration factor differences of ECM, FCF and DSSM from ICM were 0.105 (0.002–0.182), 0.016 (0.082–0.013) and 0.011 (0.056–0.009), respectively. ARD differences between ECM and DSSM as well as FCF and DSSM were significant (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
The DSSM method showed superior results over ECM and FCF to predict the optimal calibration factor in supine radiographs. The novel DSSM method could be used to improve digital templating in supine radiographs without need for additional markers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Franken M, Grimm B, Heyligers I (2010) A comparison of four systems for calibration when templating for total hip replacement with digital radiography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1):136–141. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22257
Bleß H, Kip M (2017) Weißbuch Gelenkersatz. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53,260-7
Boese CK, Bredow J, Dargel J, Eysel P, Geiges H, Lechler P (2016) Calibration marker position in digital templating of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31(4):883–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.009
Boese CK, Lechler P, Rose L, Dargel J, Oppermann J, Eysel P, Geiges H, Bredow J (2015) Calibration markers for digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. PLoS One 10(7):e0128529. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128529
Sinclair VF, Wilson J, Jain NP, Knowles D (2014) Assessment of accuracy of marker ball placement in pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29(8):1658–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.013
Boese CK, Wilhelm S, Haneder S, Lechler P, Eysel P, Bredow J (2019) Influence of calibration on digital templating of hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 43(8):1799–1805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4120-7
Boese CK, Wilhelm S, Haneder S, Lechler P, Eysel P, Bredow J (2019) Dual-position calibration markers for total hip arthroplasty: theoretical comparison to fixed calibration and single marker method. Int Orthop 43(3):589–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4034-4
Derias M, Khan MA, Buchanan J (2018) Digital templating without a calibration marker is accurate at predicting implant size for hip hemiarthroplasty. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-0994-8
King RJ, Makrides P, Gill JA, Karthikeyan S, Krikler SJ, Griffin DR (2009) A novel method of accurately calculating the radiological magnification of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(9):1217–1222. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B9.22615
Archibeck MJ, Tripuraneni KR, Carothers JT, Junick DW, Munson NR, Murray-Krezan CM (2017) Prospective, randomized, surgeon-blinded comparison of standard magnification assumption vs magnification marker usage for preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32(10):3061–3064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.016
Holzer LA, Scholler G, Wagner S, Friesenbichler J, Maurer-Ertl W, Leithner A (2019) The accuracy of digital templating in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(2):263–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3080-0
Gamble P, de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Winemaker M (2010) The accuracy of digital templating in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25(4):529–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.011
King RJ, Craig PR, Boreham BG, Majeed MA, Moran CG (2009) The magnification of digital radiographs in the trauma patient: implications for templating. Injury 40(2):173–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.027
Efe T, El Zayat BF, Heyse TJ, Timmesfeld N, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Schmitt J (2011) Precision of preoperative digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 77(5):616–621
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LL organized and performed the study, enrolled patients, collected data, performed measurements, and reviewed the manuscript.
MT critically reviewed the manuscript.
KPK critically reviewed the manuscript.
CR critically reviewed the manuscript and created artwork.
CKB conceived and designed the study, performed the analysis, and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The study was approved by the responsible ethics committee (FF 75/2018). All patients gave their informed consent. The most recent version of the Declaration of Helsinki was followed.
Conflict of interest
CKB is employee of Smith & Nephew GmbH. The other authors did not report any conflicting interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 23 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loweg, L., Trost, M., Kutzner, K.P. et al. A novel calibration method for digital templating of total hip arthroplasty: a prospective clinical study of dual scale type single marker calibration in supine radiographs. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 1693–1699 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04597-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04597-8