To compare (1) the recovery pattern of post-operative physical activity and function in the early post-operative period and (2) the difference of participation in recreational and sports activities pre- and post-operatively following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO).
In this prospective comparative study, 49 HTOs (49 patients) and 42 UKAs (42 patients) performed to treat medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) were included. The pain visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC), Tegner activity score, Lysholm knee score, and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score were evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively at three, six, 12, and 24 months. Participation in recreational and sports activities was also assessed pre-operatively and 24 months post-operatively.
Pre-operatively, although there were no differences in VAS, WOMAC, and Lysholm scores between the two groups, the UKA group had inferior Tegner and UCLA scores (p < 0.05). At post-operative three and six months, the UKA group showed superior VAS, WOMAC, and Lysholm scores (p < 0.05 for all). However, at 12 and 24 months post-operatively, both groups had similar outcome scores (p > 0.05 for all). When all the baseline scores were adjusted for the mean changes, the UKA group showed a significantly better UCLA score than the HTO group until 12 months after the operation (p = 0.008). The rate of return to sports activity was 94.1% in the UKA group and 75.0% in the HTO group at 24 months post-operatively (p = 0.031).
These findings indicate that UKA had better short-term functional outcomes and return to recreational and sports activities than did HTO in patients with medial OA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Koh IJ, Kim MW, Kim JH, Han SY, In Y (2015) Trends in high tibial osteotomy and knee arthroplasty utilizations and demographics in Korea from 2009 to 2013. J Arthroplast 30:939–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.002
Paredes-Carnero X, Leyes M, Forriol F, Fernandez-Cortinas AB, Escobar J, Babe JG (2018) Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3837-7
Dettoni F, Bonasia DE, Castoldi F, Bruzzone M, Blonna D, Rossi R (2010) High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature. Iowa Orthop J 30:131–140
Fu D, Li G, Chen K, Zhao Y, Hua Y, Cai Z (2013) Comparison of high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 28:759–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.010
Akizuki S, Shibakawa A, Takizawa T, Yamazaki I, Horiuchi H (2008) The long-term outcome of high tibial osteotomy: a ten- to 20-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:592–596. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.90b5.20386
Herry Y, Batailler C, Lording T, Servien E, Neyret P, Lustig S (2017) Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique. Int Orthop 41:2265–2271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3633-9
Saragaglia D, Bevand A, Refaie R, Rubens-Duval B, Pailhe R (2018) Results with nine years mean follow up on one hundred and three KAPS(R) uni knee arthroplasties: eighty six medial and seventeen lateral. Int Orthop 42:1061–1066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3717-6
Richmond JC (2013) Surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 39:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2012.10.008
Yim JH, Song EK, Seo HY, Kim MS, Seon JK (2013) Comparison of high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 3 years. J Arthroplast 28:243–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.06.011
Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC (1998) Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplast 13:890–895
Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, Williams-Russo P (2001) Patients’ expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-a:1005–1012
Ibrahim MS, Khan MA, Nizam I, Haddad FS (2013) Peri-operative interventions producing better functional outcomes and enhanced recovery following total hip and knee arthroplasty: an evidence-based review. BMC Med 11:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-37
Borjesson M, Weidenhielm L, Mattsson E, Olsson E (2005) Gait and clinical measurements in patients with knee osteoarthritis after surgery: a prospective 5-year follow-up study. Knee 12:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2004.04.002
Stukenborg-Colsman C, Wirth CJ, Lazovic D, Wefer A (2001) High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental joint replacement in unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis: 7-10-year follow-up prospective randomised study. Knee 8:187–194
Kim MS, Son JM, Koh IJ, Bahk JH, In Y (2017) Intraoperative adjustment of alignment under valgus stress reduces outliers in patients undergoing medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2729-4
Kim MS, Koh IJ, Choi YJ, Lee JY, In Y (2017) Differences in patient-reported outcomes between unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Arthroplast 32:1453–1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.034
Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502
Cooke TD, Li J, Scudamore RA (1994) Radiographic assessment of bony contributions to knee deformity. Orthop Clin North Am 25:387–393
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840
Odenbring S, Tjornstrand B, Egund N, Hagstedt B, Hovelius L, Lindstrand A, Luxhoj T, Svanstrom A (1989) Function after tibial osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis below aged 50 years. Acta Orthop Scand 60:527–531
Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res:43–49
Naal FD, Fischer M, Preuss A, Goldhahn J, von Knoch F, Preiss S, Munzinger U, Drobny T (2007) Return to sports and recreational activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med 35:1688–1695. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546507303562
Krych AJ, Reardon P, Sousa P, Pareek A, Stuart M, Pagnano M (2017) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty provides higher activity and durability than valgus-producing proximal tibial osteotomy at 5 to 7 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:113–122. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.01031
Nerhus TK, Ekeland A, Solberg G, Olsen BH, Madsen JE, Heir S (2017) No difference in time-dependent improvement in functional outcome following closing wedge versus opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a randomised controlled trial with two-year follow-up. Bone Joint J 99-b:1157–1166. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.99b9.bjj-2017-0062.r1
Jeon YS, Ahn CH, Kim MK (2017) Comparison of HTO with articular cartilage surgery and UKA in unicompartmental OA. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 25:2309499016684092. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499016684092
Cho WJ, Kim JM, Kim WK, Kim DE, Kim NK, Bin SI (2018) Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in old-aged patients demonstrates superior short-term clinical outcomes to open-wedge high tibial osteotomy in middle-aged patients with advanced isolated medial osteoarthritis. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3880-4
Ivarsson I, Gillquist J (1991) Rehabilitation after high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental arthroplasty. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res:139–144
Santoso MB, Wu L (2017) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, is it superior to high tibial osteotomy in treating unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis and systemic review. J Orthop Surg Res 12:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0552-9
Faschingbauer M, Nelitz M, Urlaub S, Reichel H, Dornacher D (2015) Return to work and sporting activities after high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 39:1527–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2701-2
Salzmann GM, Ahrens P, Naal FD, El-Azab H, Spang JT, Imhoff AB, Lorenz S (2009) Sporting activity after high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 37:312–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508325666
Pietschmann MF, Wohlleb L, Weber P, Schmidutz F, Ficklscherer A, Gulecyuz MF, Safi E, Niethammer TR, Jansson V, Muller PE (2013) Sports activities after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Oxford III-what can we expect? Int Orthop 37:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1710-7
Saxon L, Finch C, Bass S (1999) Sports participation, sports injuries and osteoarthritis: implications for prevention. Sports Med 28:123–135
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Level of evidence: ll
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, M.S., Koh, I.J., Sohn, S. et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is superior to high tibial osteotomy in post-operative recovery and participation in recreational and sports activities. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43, 2493–2501 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4272-5
- Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
- High tibial osteotomy
- Recreational activities
- Sports activities