Characteristics and outcomes of obstetric brachial plexus palsy in a single Saudi centre King Faisal Specialists Hospital and Research Centre: an experience of ten years
Obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) is considered a rare, unpredictable, and unavoidable injury of the upper limb. In this study, we presented a retrospective cohort study over a period of ten years in King Faisal Specialists Hospital and Research Centre (KFSH&RC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to assess the characteristics and functional outcomes of OBPP.
Between January 2005 and December 2015, we carried out 125 repairs of OBPP in KFSH&RC. Out of 71 girls and 54 boys, two babies died of unrelated causes, so they were excluded from the review. All medical records of the patients who attended OBPP clinic at KFSH&RC were reviewed, and relative data were extracted. Descriptive measures for categorical variables and categorical variables were presented. Student’s t test and Pearson’s χ2 test were used. The level of statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.
A total of 123 patients were included in the study with a mean follow-up of 6.1 ± 2.4 years. Of those, 71 (57.7%) were females. Mean age at presentation was 4.2 ± 2.7 months with a birth weight of 3965.9 ± 629.6 g. More than half of the patients (56.1%) sustained the injury in the right side, and 62 patients (50.4%) were classified as Narakas I. Most of the surgeries (96.7%) were nerve grafting. Only 32 (26.0%) patients needed one or more secondary interventions. In the last visit, the mean total score of Mallet was 16.6 ± 2.8. Also, passive external rotation in adduction improved to 38.3 ± 14.5. Last Raimondi hand function grade was 2 ± 1.
Our experience demonstrated the value of primary and secondary surgeries in patients with OBPP. Also, we presented the patterns of injury in Saudi patients presented to KFSH&RC.
KeywordsObstetric brachial plexus palsy Brachial plexus repair Recovery of function Characteristics Saudi Arabia
We appreciatively recognize Ms. Samah S. Al-Harbi, senior physical therapist, for her assistance and cooperation in developing and improving the physical therapy programs of OPBB patients.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at KFSH&RC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- 3.Pondaag W, Malessy MJ, van Dijk JG, Thomeer RT (2004) Natural history of obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004(46):138–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2004.tb00463.x Google Scholar
- 4.Jennett RJ, Tarby TJ, Krauss RL (2002) Erb’s palsy contrasted with Klumpke’s and total palsy: different mechanisms are involved. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. pp 1216–1220Google Scholar
- 5.Koenigsberger MR (1980) Brachial-plexus palsy at birth-intrauterine or due to delivery trauma. In: annals of neurology. Lippincott-Raven Publ 227 East Washington SQ, Philadelphia, PA 19106, p 228Google Scholar
- 6.DeFrancesco CJ, Shah DK, Rogers BH, Shah AS (2017) The epidemiology of brachial plexus birth palsy in the United States: declining incidence and evolving risk factors. J Pediatr Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001089
- 11.Erb WH (1874) Ueber eine eigenthümliche Localisation von Lähmungen im Plexus brachialis. Carl Winter’s UniversitätbuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
- 13.Narakas AO (1987) Obstetrical brachial plexus injuries. Paralys. hand:116–135Google Scholar
- 18.Mallet J (1972) Obstetrical paralysis of the brachial plexus. 3. Conclusions. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 58(Suppl 1):201–204Google Scholar
- 19.Raimondi P (1993) Evaluation of results in obstetric brachial plexus palsy: the hand. In: International Meeting on Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy. Heerlen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- 20.van der Holst M, Groot J, Steenbeek D, et al (2017) Participation restrictions among adolescents and adults with neonatal brachial plexus palsy: the patient perspective. Disabil Rehabil 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1380717
- 21.Gilbert A, Brockman R, Carlioz H (1991) Surgical treatment of brachial plexus birth palsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 39–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199103000-00005
- 24.Pondaag W, De Boer R, Van Wijlen-Hempel MS et al (2005) External rotation as a result of suprascapular nerve neurotization in obstetric brachial plexus lesions. Neurosurgery 57:530–536. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000170557.13788.D2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Narakas A (1995) Examen du patient et de la fonction des divers groupes musculaires du membre supérieur. Les Paralys du Plex brachial 2nd ed Paris Expans Sci Française 52–67Google Scholar
- 31.Pondaag W, Malessy MJA (2014) The evidence for nerve repair in obstetric brachial plexus palsy revisited. Biomed Res. Int. 2014Google Scholar
- 33.Wahabi H, Fayed A, Esmaeil S, et al (2017) Prevalence and complications of pregestational and gestational diabetes in Saudi women: analysis from Riyadh Mother and Baby Cohort Study (RAHMA). Biomed Res Int 2017:. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6878263
- 41.Monreal R (2018) One-bone forearm osteodesis and biceps re-routing to correct severe supination contracture in a paediatric patient with late obstetric brachial plexus palsy. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3753-2