Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in old-aged patients demonstrates superior short-term clinical outcomes to open-wedge high tibial osteotomy in middle-aged patients with advanced isolated medial osteoarthritis
- 177 Downloads
The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA) and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) for advanced isolated medial osteoarthritis (OA).
Patients with advanced medial compartment OA (Ahlbäck grade ≥ II) who underwent either MB-UKA with Oxford Knee or OWHTO were included. The minimum follow-up was two years. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, knee score (KS), and function score (FS) of the Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Pre-operative and post-operative values were compared within groups. Pre-operative and post-operative values and the degree of change were compared between the two groups. Radiologic progression of OA in either the lateral or patellofemoral compartment was evaluated.
Forty knees (20 received MB-UKA, 20 received OWHTO) were enrolled. The mean age was higher in the MB-UKA group (67.9 ± 9.0 years) than in the OWHTO group (58.4 ± 5.5 years). The HSS score, KS, and FS were significantly increased post-operatively in both groups. The preoperative HSS score, KS, and FS were significantly lower in the MB-UKA than in the OWHTO group; however, only the post-operative HSS score was significantly higher in the MB-UKA group. The changes in HSS score and KS were also greater in the MB-UKA group. There was no significant difference in OA progression.
Although there was an age difference between the two groups, MB-UKA demonstrated superior short-term clinical outcomes to OWHTO for advanced isolated medial OA. In particular, MB-UKA was more effective in terms of pain relief.
KeywordsMobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy Advanced isolated medial osteoarthritis Clinical outcomes
Compliance with ethical standards
This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN (2006) A 12-28-year followup study of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:91–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000229362.12244.f6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Niemeyer P, Schmal H, Hauschild O, von Heyden J, Sudkamp NP, Kostler W (2010) Open-wedge osteotomy using an internal plate fixator in patients with medial-compartment gonarthritis and varus malalignment: 3-year results with regard to preoperative arthroscopic and radiographic findings. Arthroscopy 26:1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2010.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Bonasia DE, Dettoni F, Sito G, Blonna D, Marmotti A, Bruzzone M, Castoldi F, Rossi R (2014) Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment overload/arthritis in the varus knee: prognostic factors. Am J Sports Med 42:690–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513516577 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Tuncay I, Bilsel K, Elmadag M, Erkocak OF, Asci M, Sen C (2015) Evaluation of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, opening wedge, and dome-type high tibial osteotomies for knee arthritis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 49:280–287. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.2015.14.0320 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Naudie D, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Bourne TJ (1999) The Install Award. Survivorship of the high tibial valgus osteotomy. A 10-to-22-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res:18–27Google Scholar
- 18.Aglietti P, Rinonapoli E, Stringa G, Taviani A (1983) Tibial osteotomy for the varus osteoarthritic knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 239–251Google Scholar
- 19.Brouwer RW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Koeveringe AJ, Verhaar JA (2005) Patellar height and the inclination of the tibial plateau after high tibial osteotomy. The open versus the closed-wedge technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1227–1232. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.87b9.15972 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Oh KJ, Kim YC, Lee JS, Chang YS, Shetty GM, Nha KW (2017) Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: no difference in progression of patellofemoral joint arthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:767–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4450-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 78:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610013538 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar