Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Sometimes, total knee replacement (TKR) is performed after a tibial osteotomy. It is not known if the osteotomy influences the clinical process of a TKR. The aim of this study was to look at the clinical outcome of a TKR after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) compared to a TKR with no HTO.

Methods

Between 1995 and 2005, 41 post-HTO TKRs (group A) with a minimum follow-up of ten years were selected. In parallel, it was selected a control group undergoing simple TKR, consisting of 41 patients (group B) matched with group A. The Knee Society Knee Score (KS), Knee Score Functional Score (FS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and the range of motion (ROM) were used for evaluation at one, five and ten years after surgery. The Insall-Salvatti ratio (ISR), the posterior tibial slope (PTS), and the joint height line (JHL) were also measured both pre-operatively and post-operatively.

Results

No differences were found between both groups in KS, FS, OKS, and ROM at the pre-operative stage or at any of the post-operative controls. Higher patellar height was found in group A, both pre-operatively and post-operatively (p < 0.005), and the same for PTS pre-operative (p < 0.001) and post-operative (p < 0.05). No differences were found regarding the JHL. Post-operative differences were found among the post-HTO subgroups at the FS (p < 0.02), the OKS (p < 0.05), and the ROM (p < 0.01) as a function of whether there was a varus or a valgus deformity before the TKR.

Conclusion

A HTO was not determinant for having a worse outcome at the TKR, even when there were radiographic differences. The coronal alignment with valgus deformity pre-TKR after a HTO showed better functional results than in the case of varus deformity.

Level of evidence III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amendola L, Fosco M, Cenni E, Tigani D (2010) Knee joint arthroplasty after tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 34:289–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bae DK, Song SJ, Park CH, Liang H, Bae JK (2017) Comparison of mid-term results between conversion total knee arthroplasties following closed wedge high tibial osteotomy and primary total knee arthroplasties: a matched pair study including patellar symptom and position. J Orthop Sci 22(3):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bae DK, Song SJ, Yoon KH (2010) Total knee arthroplasty following closed wedge high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 34:283–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bastos Filho R, Magnussen RA, Duthon V, Demey G, Servien E, Granjeiro JM, Neyret P (2013) Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a comparison of opening and closing wedge osteotomy. Int Orthop 37:427–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cameron HU, Park YS (1996) Total knee replacement following high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee. Orthopedics 19:807–808

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Azab H, Glabgly P, Paul J, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2010) Patellar height and posterior tibial slope after open- and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a radiological study on 100 patients. Am J Sports Med 38:323–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Erak S, Naudie D, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB (2011) Total knee arthroplasty following medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy: technical issues early clinical radiological results. Knee 18:499–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ewald FC (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farfalli LA, Farfalli GL, Aponte-Tinao LA (2013) Complications in total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. Orthopedics 35:464–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaasbeek R, Welsing R, Barink M, Verdonschot N, van Kampen A (2007) The influence of open and closed high tibial osteotomy on dynamic patellar tracking: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:978–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haddad FS, Bentley G (2000) Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a medium-term review. J Arthroplast 15:597–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haslam P, Armstrong M, Geutjens G, Wilton TJ (2007) Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy long-term follow-up of matched groups. J Arthroplast 22:245–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hofmann AA, Wyatt RW, Beck SW (1991) High tibial osteotomy: use of an osteotomy jig, rigid fixation, and early motion versus conventional surgical technique and cast immobilization. Clin Orthop Relat Res 271:212–217

    Google Scholar 

  14. Insall JN, Hood RW, Flawn LB, Sullivan DJ (1983) The total condylar knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis. A five to nine-year follow-up of the first 100 consecutive replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(5):619–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Insall JN, Joseph DM, Msika C (1984) High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis: a long-term follow up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(7):1040–1048

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    Google Scholar 

  17. Insall JN, Salvati E (1971) Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology 101:101–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Madan S, Ranjith RK, Fiddian NJ (2002– 2003) Total knee replacement following high tibial osteotomy. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 61:5–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meding JB, Keating EM, Ritter MA, Faris PM (2000) Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. A comparison study in patients who had bilateral total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82(9):1252–1259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard D, Carr AJ, Dawson J (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(8):1010–1014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nagamine R, Inoue S, Miura H, Matsuda S, Iwamoto Y (2007) Femoral shaft bowing influences the correction angle for high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop Sci 12:214–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Niinimäki T, Eskelinen A, Ohtonen P, Puhto AP, Mann BS, Leppilahti J (2014) Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a registry-based case–control study of 1,036 knees. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:73–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nizard RS, Cardinne L, Bizot P, Witvoet J (1998) Total knee replacement after failed tibial osteotomy: results of a matched-pair study. J Arthroplast 13:847–853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Parvizi J, Hanssen AD, Spangehl MJ (2004) Total knee arthroplasty following proximal tibial osteotomy: risk factors for failure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(3):474–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell AG, Frampton C (2012) Osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty converted to total knee arthroplasty:data from the New Zealand joint registry. J Arthroplast 27:1827–1831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Scuderi GR, Windsor RE, Insall JN (1989) Observations on patellar height after proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(2):245–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. van Raaij TM, Bakker W, Reijman M, Verhaar JA (2007) The effect of high tibial osteotomy on the results of total knee arthroplasty: a matched case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:74

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. W-Dahl A, Robertsson O, Lohmander LS (2012) High tibial osteotomy in Sweden, 1998-2007: a population-based study of the use and rate of revision to knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83:244–248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Westrich GH, Peters LE, Haas SB, Buly RL, Windsor RE (1998) Patella height after high tibial osteotomy with internal fixation and early motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Windsor RE, Insall JN, Vince KG (1988) Technical considerations of total knee arthroplasty after proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70(4):547–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mar González for their technical support; without her help, this work would be impossible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xavier Paredes-Carnero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paredes-Carnero, X., Leyes, M., Forriol, F. et al. Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 42, 2087–2096 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3837-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3837-7

Keywords

Navigation