International Orthopaedics

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1241–1246 | Cite as

Dual mobility hip arthroplasty provides better outcomes compared to hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a retrospective comparative clinical study

  • Yong Tae Kim
  • Je-Hyun Yoo
  • Min Ki Kim
  • Sanghyun Kim
  • Jihyo Hwang
Original Paper
  • 249 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Total hip arthroplasty with a dual mobility cup (DMC) is a proposed alternative to the widely performed bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) for treating displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures (DFNF) in the elderly. However, the comparison between the two modalities has not been extensively conducted thus far.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted with DFNF patients aged over 65 years who were treated either by BHA or DMC. After propensity matching each group comprised 84 patients (168 patients in total) and was analyzed using peri-operative and post-operative parameters.

Results

Mean follow-up durations were 22.1 and 21.7 months in the BHA and DMC groups, respectively. The BHA group demonstrated significantly less intra-operative blood loss (p = 0.001) and a shorter length of operation (p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in one-year mortality (p = 0.773). The Harris hip score (HHS) was significantly higher (p = 0.018) in the DMC group. The dislocation rate was not different between the two groups (p = 1.000).

Conclusion

In DFNF patients aged over 65 years, short-term observation showed DMC to be the preferred treatment over BHA with better clinical outcome, without disadvantages in mortality or dislocation rate. Further long-term investigations are recommended to strengthen these results.

Keywords

Femoral neck fracture Hip arthroplasty Hemiarthroplasty Dual mobility cup Dislocation Harris hip score 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

This research did not receive any support or grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained, and the study was in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1726–1733.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA (1997) World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 44:407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parker M, Johansen A (2006) Hip fracture. BMJ 333:27–30.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.333.7557.27 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hongisto MT, Pihlajamäki H, Niemi S et al (2014) Surgical procedures in femoral neck fractures in Finland: a nationwide study between 1998 and 2011. Int Orthop 38:1685–1690.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2346-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Greenough CG, Jones JR (1988) Primary total hip replacement for displaced subcapital fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:639–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Graham J, Bowen TR, Strohecker KA et al (2014) Reducing mortality in hip fracture patients using a perioperative approach and “patient- centered medical home” model: a prospective cohort study. Patient Saf Surg 8:7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-8-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB (2009) Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA 302:1573–1579.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1462 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burgers PTPW, Van Geene AR, Van den Bekerom MPJ et al (2012) Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials. Int Orthop 36:1549–1560.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1569-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhao Y, Fu D, Chen K et al (2014) Outcome of hemiarthroplasty and total hip replacement for active elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis of 8 randomized clinical trials. PLoS One 9:e98071.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098071 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bousquet G, Gazielly DF, Debiesse JL et al (1985) The ceramic coated cementless total hip arthroplasty: basic concepts and surgical technique. J Orthop Surg Tech 1:15–28Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grazioli A, Ek ETH, Rüdiger HA (2012) Biomechanical concept and clinical outcome of dual mobility cups. Int Orthop 36:2411–2418.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1678-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meek RMD, Allan DB, McPhillips G et al (2006) Epidemiology of dislocation after total hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:9–18.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000218754.12311.4a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Conroy JL, Whitehouse SL, Graves SE et al (2008) Risk factors for revision for early dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 23:867–872.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carulli C, Macera A, Matassi F et al (2016) The use of a dual mobility cup in the management of recurrent dislocations of hip hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 17:131–136.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-015-0365-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Batailler C, Fary C, Verdier R et al (2017) The evolution of outcomes and indications for the dual-mobility cup: a systematic review. Int Orthop 41:645–659.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3377-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B et al (2009) The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop 33:927–932.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0589-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tarasevicius S, Robertsson O, Dobozinskas P, Wingstrand H (2013) A comparison of outcomes and dislocation rates using dual articulation cups and THA for intracapsular femoral neck fractures. HIP Int 23:22–26.  https://doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2013.10632 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Adam P, Philippe R, Ehlinger M et al (2012) Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:296–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.01.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bensen AS, Jakobsen T, Krarup N (2014) Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation and re-operation when used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures. Int Orthop 38:1241–1245.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2276-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bjorgul K, Novicoff WM, Saleh KJ (2010) American society of anesthesiologist physical status score may be used as a comorbidity index in hip fracture surgery. J Arthroplast 25:134–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    van den Bekerom MPJ, Hilverdink EF, Sierevelt IN et al (2010) A comparison of hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck: a randomised controlled multicentre trial in patients aged 70 years and over. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1422–1428.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.24899 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blomfeldt R, Törnkvist H, Eriksson K et al (2007) A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:160–165.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang F, Zhang H, Zhang Z et al (2015) Comparison of bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:229.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0696-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Blewitt N, Mortimore S (1992) Outcome of dislocation after hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of the femur. Injury 23:320–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(92)90179-V CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bhandari M, Devereaux P, Tornetta P (2005) Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87–A:2122–2131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryHallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart HospitalSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryHallym University Sacred Heart HospitalAnyangSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations