Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)—computed tomography evaluation at a short term follow-up. Part II
Purpose and hypothesis
The aim of this study was to evaluate and to compare the radiological parameters after arthroscopic and open Latarjet technique via evaluation of computed tomography (CT) scans. Our hypothesis was that the radiological results after arthroscopic stabilisation remained in the proximity of those results achieved after open stabilisation.
Material and methods
CT scan evaluation results of patients after primary Latarjet procedure were analysed. Patients operated on between 2006 and 2011 using an open technique composed the OPEN group and patients operated on arthroscopically between 2011 and 2013 composed the ARTHRO group. Forty-three out of 55 shoulders (78.2%) in OPEN and 62 out of 64 shoulders (95.3%) in ARTHRO were available for CT scan evaluation. The average age at surgery was 28 years in OPEN and 26 years in ARTHRO. The mean follow-up was 54.2 months in OPEN and 23.4 months in ARTHRO. CT scan evaluation was used to assess graft fusion and osteolysis. Bone block position and screw orientation were assessed in the axial and the sagittal views. The subscapularis muscle fatty infiltration was evaluated according to Goutallier classification.
The non-union rate was significantly higher in OPEN than in ARTHRO: 5 (11.9%) versus 1 (1.7%) (p < 0.05). The total graft osteolysis was significantly higher in the OPEN group: five cases (11.9%) versus zero in ARTHRO (p < 0.05). Graft fracture incidence was comparable in both groups: in two patients in ARTHRO (3.3%) and one case (2.4%) in the OPEN group (p > 0.05). These results should be evaluated very carefully due to significant difference in the follow-up of both groups. A significantly higher rate of partial graft osteolysis at the level of the superior screw was reported in ARTHRO with 32 patients (53.3%) versus 10 (23.8%) in OPEN (p < 0.05). In the axial view, 78.4% of patients in ARTHRO and 80.5% in OPEN had the coracoid bone block in an acceptable position (between 4 mm medially and 2 mm laterally). In the sagittal plane, the bone block was in an acceptable position between 2 and 5 o’clock in 86.7% of patients in ARTHRO and 90.2% in OPEN (p > 0.05). However, in the position between 3 and 5 o’clock there were 56.7% of the grafts in ARTHRO versus 87.8% in OPEN (p < 0.05). The screws were more parallel to the glenoid surface in ARTHRO—the angles were 12.3° for the inferior screw and 12.6° for the superior one. These angles in the OPEN group were respectively 15° and 17° (p < 0.05 and for the superior screw). There was no significant difference in the presence of fatty infiltration of the subscapularis muscle.
Arthroscopic Latarjet stabilisation showed satisfactory radiographic results, comparable to the open procedure, however the short-term follow-up can bias this evaluation. Graft healing rate was very high in the arthroscopic technique, but yet osteolysis of the superior part of the graft and more superior graft position in the sagittal view were significantly different when compared to the open technique. The screw position was slightly more parallel to the glenoid via the arthroscopic technique. We recommend both further investigation and development of the arthroscopic technique.
Level of evidence: III.
KeywordsArthroscopic Latarjet stabilisation Coracoid transfer Open Latarjet stabilisation Shoulder instability
- 12.Hovelius L, Sandström B, Sundgren K, Saebö M (2004) One hundred eighteen Bristow-Latarjet repairs for recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder prospectively followed for fifteen years: study I - clinical results. J Shoulder Elb Surg 13:509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kordasiewicz B, Malachowski K, Kicinski M et al (2017) Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)-clinical results at short term follow-up. Int Orthop 41(5):1023–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3372-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Hovelius L, Sandstrom B, Saebo M (2006) One hundred eighteen Bristow-Latarjet repairs for recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder prospectively followed for fifteen years: study II—the evolution of dislocation arthropathy. J Shoulder Elb Surg 15:279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Hovelius L, Sandström B, Olofsson A et al (2012) The effect of capsular repair, bone block healing, and position on the results of the Bristow-Latarjet procedure (study III): long-term follow-up in 319 shoulders. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21:647–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.03.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Schmid SL, Farshad M, Catanzaro S, Gerber C (2012) The Latarjet procedure for the treatment of recurrence of anterior instability of the shoulder after operative repair: a retrospective case series of forty-nine consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:e75. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00380 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Walch G (1991) Recurrent anterior shoulder instability [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 77(Suppl 1):177–191Google Scholar
- 32.Haeni DL, Opsomer G, Sood A et al (2016) Three-dimensional volume measurement of coracoid graft osteolysis after arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. J Shoulder Elb Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.08.007
- 33.Di Giacomo G, Costantini A, De Gasperis N et al (2011) Coracoid graft osteolysis after the Latarjet procedure for anteroinferior shoulder instability: a computed tomography scan study of twenty-six patients. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20:989–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Moroder P, Blocher M, Auffarth A et al (2014) Clinical and computed tomography-radiologic outcome after bony glenoid augmentation in recurrent anterior shoulder instability without significant glenoid bone loss. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:420–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Hardy A, Gerometta A, Granger B et al (2016) Preoperative CT planning of screw length in arthroscopic Latarjet. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4286-8