Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 867–874 | Cite as

Two-stage revision of infected shoulder arthroplasty using prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement: minimum three-year follow-up

  • Sung Hyun Lee
  • Se Jin Kim
  • Seng Hwan Kook
  • Jeong Woo Kim
Original Paper
  • 370 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and persistent infection rate of two-stage revision of infected shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

We enrolled 12 patients who developed an infection after undergoing shoulder arthroplasty between January 2009 and January 2014. They underwent a two-stage revision with PROSTALAC implantation and shoulder re-implantation in the first- and second-stage surgery, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 40.88 months (range, 36–52 months). After the second-stage re-implantation, clinical scores, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, as well as C-reactive protein level were evaluated, and the presence of re-infection and complications were analyzed.

Results

Infection was improved in all the cases after PROSTALAC insertion. The mean range of motion of forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation at the final follow-up after the second-stage re-implantation were 81.67°, 40.42°, and 16.67° (vertebral level), respectively. The mean visual analog scale score improved from 7.08 points before surgery to 2.33 points after surgery. The Modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 32.25 before surgery to 64.17 after surgery (P < 0.05). The Constant shoulder score also improved from 30.92 before surgery to 66.08 after surgery (P < 0.05). Infection had not recurred until the final follow-up. However, dislocation and separation of components were found in two patients who needed a structural allograft because of segmental bone defects.

Conclusion

Using PROSTALAC in two-stage revision arthroplasty is effective for infection control and produced good clinical outcomes after second-stage shoulder re-implantation. However, cases involving segmental bone defects require additional precautions in maintaining the appropriate tension and height to prevent complications.

Keywords

Shoulder arthroplasty Infected arthroplasty Two-stage surgery Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a Wonkwang University research grant 2018.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Institutional review board approval was obtained before starting the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Carroll RM, Izquierdo R, Vazquez M, Blaine TA, Levine WN, Bigliani LU (2004) Conversion of painful hemiarthroplasty to total shoulder arthroplasty: long-term results. J Shoulder Elb Surg 13:599–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coste JS, Reig S, Trojani C, Berg M, Walch G, Boileau P (2004) The management of infection in arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:65–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deshmukh AV, Koris M, Zurakowski D, Thornhill TS (2005) Total shoulder arthroplasty: long-term survivorship, functional outcome, and quality of life. J Shoulder Elb Surg 14:471–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friedman DJ, Parnes N, Dunn JC, Higgins LD, Warner JJ (2008) PROSTALAC implantation for two-stage eradication of infected shoulder arthroplasty. Tech Should Elbow Surg 9:114–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garvin KL, Hanssen AD (1995) Infection after total hip arthroplasty: past, present, and future. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1576–1588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goulet JA, Pellici PM, Brause BD, Salvati EM (1998) Prolonged suppression of infection in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 3:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grosso MJ, Frangiamore SJ, Ricchetti ET, Bauer TW, Iannotti JP (2014) Sensitivity of frozen section histology for identifying Propionibacteriumacnes infections in revisionshoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(6):442–447.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00258 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grosso MJ, Sabesan VJ, Ho JC, Ricchetti ET, Iannotti JP (2012) Reinfection rates after 1-stage revision shoulder arthroplasty for patients with unexpected positive intraoperative cultures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(6):754–758.  https://doi.org/10.1016/ j. jse.2011.08.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hackett DJ Jr, Crosby LA (2013) Evaluation and treatment of the infected shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 71(Suppl 2):88–93Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hsu JE, Somerson JS, Vo KV, Matsen FA 3rd (2017) What is a "periprosthetic shoulder infection"? A systematic review of two decades of publications. Int Orthop 41(4):813–822.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3421-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jacquot A, Sirveaux F, Roche O, Favard L, Clavert P, Mole D (2015) Surgical management of the infected reversed shoulder arthroplasty: a French multicenter study of reoperation in 32 patients. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24(11):1713–1722.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jse.2015.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jason E, Hsu, JE, Somerson KV, Matsen FA 3rd (2017) What is a periprosthetic shoulder infection? A systematic review of two decades of publications. Int Orthop 41(4):813–822.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3421-6
  13. 13.
    Jawa A, Shi L, O’Brien T, Wells J, Higgins L, Macy J et al (2011) Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement (PROSTALAC) use for the treatment of infection after shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2001–2009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klatte TO, Junghans K, Al-Khateeb H, Rueger JM, Gehrke T, Kendoff D, Neumann J (2013) Single-stage revision for periprosthetic shoulder infection: outcomes and results. Bone Joint J 95-B(3):391–395.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B3.30134 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lautenschlager EP, Jacobs JJ, Marshall GW, Meyer PR Jr (1976) Mechanical properties of bone cements containing large doses of antibiotic powders. J Biomed Mater Res 10:929–938CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lieberman JR, Callaway GH, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Brause BD (1994) Treatment of the infected total hip arthroplasty with a two-stage reimplantation protocol. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:205–212Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Huri G, Grassi A, Roberti di Sarsina T, Carbone G, Guerra E, McFarland EG, Doral MN, Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S (2017) Surgical treatment of infected shoulder arthroplasty. A systematic review. Int Orthop 41(4):823–830.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3399-0
  18. 18.
    Meehan AM, Osmon DR, Duffy MC, Hanssen AD, Keating MR (2003) Outcome of penicillin-susceptible streptococcal prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement and retention of the prosthesis. Clin Infect Dis 36:845–849CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Postacchini R, Carbone S, Canero G, Ripani M, Postacchini F (2016) Reverse shoulder prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Int Orthop 40(5):965–973.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2916-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramsey ML, Fenlin JM Jr (1996) Use of an antibiotic-impregnated bone cement block in the revision of an infected shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 5:479–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scharfenberger A, Clark M, Lavoie G, O’Connor G, Masson E, Beaupre LA (2007) Treatment of an infected total hip replacement with the PROSTALAC system. Part 1: infection resolution. Can J Surg 50:24–28PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Singh JA, Sperling JW, Schleck C, Harmsen WS, Cofield RH (2012) Periprosthetic infections after total shoulder arthroplasty: a 33-year perspective. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(11):1534–1541.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (1998) Neer hemiarthroplasty and Neer total shoulder arthroplasty in patients fifty years old or less: long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:464–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (2004) Minimum fifteen-year follow-up of Neer hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty years or younger. J Shoulder Elb Surg 13:604–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sperling JW, Kozak TK, Hanssen AD, Cofield RH (2001) Infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 382:206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stewart MP, Kelly IG (1997) Total shoulder replacement in rheumatoid disease: 7- to 13-year follow-up of 37 joints. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:68–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sung Hyun Lee
    • 1
  • Se Jin Kim
    • 1
  • Seng Hwan Kook
    • 1
  • Jeong Woo Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of MedicineWonkwang University HospitalIksanRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations