Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Natural history of the ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament: a three dimensional analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Three-dimensional (3D) imaging using computed tomography (CT) has made it possible to accurately evaluate ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Recently, we developed a novel technique to measure ossification volume using the 3D analysis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the natural course of OPLL and the risk factors for volume progression.

Methods

Forty-one patients (22 males and 19 females) diagnosed with cervical OPLL who had been non-surgically treated were included in this study. We evaluated clinical examination, radiological findings, and the volume of ossified lesions during at least 1-year intervals. Furthermore, we performed risk factor analysis for OPLL volume progression.

Results

The mean ossification volume was 2047.4 ± 1437.3 mm3 in the first examination and 2201.0 ± 1524.1 mm3 in the final examination, indicating a significant increase during the follow-up period (p < 0.001). The mean annual rate of lesion increase was 4.1 ± 2.7%. Univariate regression analysis demonstrated significant relationships between the annual rate of lesion increase and age (β = −0.48; p = 0.001), body weight (BW) (β = 0.36; p = 0.02), and body mass index (BMI) (β = 0.35; p = 0.03). Furthermore, age was the only significant predictor of OPLL progression (R2 = 0.23; p = 0.001) in multivariate liner regression analysis.

Conclusions

Younger age, higher BW, and higher BMI are predictors of OPLL progression. Younger age is the most significant predictor in non-surgically treated patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H (2007) Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: part 1: clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:647–653. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000257560.91147.86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fragen KM, Cox JB, Hoh DJ (2012) Does ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament progress after laminoplasty? Radiographic and clinical evidence of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament lesion growth and the risk factors for late neurologic deterioration. J Neurosurg Spine 17:512–524. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsunaga S, Nakamura K, Seichi A et al (2008) Radiographic predictors for the development of myelopathy in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a multicenter cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2648–2650. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817f988c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, Nakamura H, Sugimori K, Tsuji H, Kimura T (2001) Progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament following en bloc cervical laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1798–1802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Iwasaki M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, Yonenobu K (2002) Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow up. J Neurosurg 96:180–189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hori T, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T (2007) How does the ossification area of the posterior longitudinal ligament thicken following cervical laminoplasty? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E551–E556. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814614f3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Taketomi E, Komiya S (2004) Clinical course of patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a minimum 10-year cohort study. J Neurosurg 100:245–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takatsu T, Ishida Y, Suzuki K, Inoue H (1998) Radiological study of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Spinal Disord 12:271–273

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Nagamoto Y et al (2012) Three-dimensional measurement of growth of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg Spine 16:289–895. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.11.SPINE11502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Izumi T, Hirano T, Watanabe K, Sano A, Ito T, Endo N (2013) Three-dimensional evaluation of volume change in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine using computed tomography. Eur Spine J 22:2569–2574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2989-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Katsumi K, Izumi T, Ito T, Hirano T, Watanabe K, Ohashi M (2016) Posterior instrumented fusion suppresses the progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a comparison of laminoplasty with and without instrumented fusion by three dimensional analysis. Eur Spine J 25:1634–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4328-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Investigation Committee on OPLL of the Japanese Ministry of Public Health and Welfare (1981) The ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine (OPLL). Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 55:425–440

    Google Scholar 

  13. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (1994) Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 68:134–147 (in Japanese)

  14. Jayakumar PN, Kolluri VR, Vasudev MK, Srikanth SG (1996) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine in Asian Indians: a multiracial comparison. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 98:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-8467(96)00004-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tokuhashi Y, Ajiro Y, Umezawa N (2009) A patient with two re-surgeries for delayed myelopathy due to progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments after cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E101–E105. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818a3135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chiba K, Yamamoto I, Hirabayashi H, Iwasaki M, Goto H, Yonenobu K, Toyama Y (2005) Multicenter study investigating the postoperative progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine: a new computer-assisted measurement. J Neurosurg Spine 3:17–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Taketomi E (1997) Progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Spine Res 8:359–366 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kajiura K, Ikata T, Katoh S, Sairyo K, Chikawa T, Hamada Y (1998) The progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a long-term follow-up study of more than 10 years (author’s translation). Investigation committee 1998 report on the ossification of the spinal ligaments of the Japanese Ministry of Public Health and welfare. Springer, Tokyo, pp 146–148 (in Japanese)

  19. Akune T, Ogata N, Seichi A, Ohnishi I, Nakamura K, Kawaguchi H (2001) Insulin secretory response is positively associated with the extent of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1537–1544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shingyouchi Y, Nagahama A, Niida M (1996) Ligamentous ossification of the cervical spine in the late middle-aged Japanese men. Its relation to body mass index and glucose metabolism. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:2474–2478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas DM, Hards DK, Roġers SD, Ng KW, Best JD (1997) Insulin and bone, clinical and scientific view. Endocrinol Metab North Am 4:5–17

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chang H, Kong CG, Won HY, Kim JH, Park JB (2010) Inter- and intra-observer variability of a cervical OPLL classification using reconstructed CT images. Clin Orthop Surg 2:8–12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Nagamoto Y et al (2012) Three-dimensional measurement of intervertebral range of motion in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: are there mobile segments in the continuous type? J Neurosurg Spine 17:74–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y (2012) Surgical treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and its outcomes: posterior surgery by laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E303–E308. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318239cca0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Kawabe J et al (2008) A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: the K-line. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E990–E993. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318188b300

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Investigation Committee on the Ossification of the Spinal Ligaments of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kei Watanabe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(XLSX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katsumi, K., Watanabe, K., Izumi, T. et al. Natural history of the ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament: a three dimensional analysis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 42, 835–842 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3667-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3667-z

Keywords

Navigation