International Orthopaedics

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 843–849 | Cite as

Comprehensive comparison of therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency target disc decompression and nucleoplasty for lumbar disc herniation: a five year follow-up

  • Hui-yong Nie
  • Ya-bin Qi
  • Na Li
  • Suo-liang Wang
  • Yong-xiao Cao
Original Paper



To compare the therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency target disc decompression(TDD) and nucleoplasty for lumbar disc herniation.


Two hundred sixty patients with lumbar disc herniation were divided into two groups: target disc decompression group (group T, n = 147) and nucleoplasty group (group N, n = 113). Visual analogue scale (VAS) and functional rating index (FRI) were measured at one, three, six, 12, 24, and 60 months after the surgery. Hospitalization time, operation time, complications, and recurrence/invalid were compared between the two groups.


Compared with the pre-operation, the VAS and FRI in both groups were significantly decreased in post-operation(P < 0.01). The VAS and FRI in group T have no significant difference compared to those in group N. The hospitalization and operation time of group T were significantly longer than those in group N. There was no significant difference of the occurrence of complications and disease recurrence/invalid during the follow-up between the two groups. Logstic regression analysis showed that operation time was an independent factor in the prognosis. Operation time affects the treatment effect. Shorter operation time leads to better therapeutic efficacy, and longer operation time leads to poor therapeutic efficacy.


Both TDD and nucleoplasty can reduce pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation and improve quality of life. Group N had shorter hospitalization and operation time than group T.


Lumbar disc herniation Radiofrequency Sciatica Nucleoplasty Target disc decompression Chronic pain 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest


Ethical approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Lew S, Mehalic T, Fagone K (2001) Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of far-lateral and foraminal lumbar disc herniations. J Neurosurg 94(2 Suppl):216–220. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Annen M, Peterson C, Leemann S et al (2016) Comparison of outcomes in MRI confirmed lumbar disc herniation patients with and without modic changes treated with high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation. J Manip Physiol Ther 39(3):200–209. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pan Z, Ha Y, Yi S et al (2016) Efficacy of transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) technique in treating lumbar disc herniation. Med Sci Monit 22:530–539. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shin JS, Lee J, Lee YJ et al (1976) Long-term course of alternative and integrative therapy for lumbar disc herniation and risk factors for surgery: a prospective observational 5-year follow-up study. Spine 41(16):955–963. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hong J, Ball PA (2016) Images in clinical medicine. Resolution of lumbar disk herniation without surgery. N Engl J Med 374(16):1564. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mamuti M, Fan S, Liu J et al (1976) Mini-open anterior lumbar interbody fusion for recurrent lumbar disc herniation following posterior instrumentation. Spine 41(18):1104–1114. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Du J, Tang X, Jing X, Li N, Wang Y, Zhang X (2016) Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a translaminar approach, especially for soft, highly down-migrated lumbar disc herniation. Int Orthop 40(6):1247–1252. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang D, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Zhang X, Sheng M (2015) Target radiofrequency combined with collagenase chemonucleolysis in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(1):526–532PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dabo X, Ziqiang C, Yinchuan Z et al (2016) The clinical results of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (peid) in the treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniation: a case-control study. Pain Physician. 19(2):69–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leon JF, Ortiz JG, Fonseca EO, Martinez CR, Cuellar GO (2016) Radiofrequency neurolysis for lumbar pain using a variation of the original technique. Pain Physician. 19(3):155–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perri M, Grattacaso G, Di Tunno V et al (2015) MRI DWI/ADC signal predicts shrinkage of lumbar disc herniation after O2-O3 discolysis. Neuroradiol J 28(2):198–204. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adakli B, Cakar Turhan KS, Asik I (2015) The comparison of the efficacy of radiofrequency nucleoplasty and targeted disc decompression in lumbar radiculopathy. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 15(2):57–61.  10.17305/bjbms.2015.427 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stienen MN, Joswig H, Smoll NR et al (2016) Short- and long-term effects of smoking on pain and health-related quality of life after non-instrumented lumbar spine surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 142:87–92. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martins DE, Astur N, Kanas M, Ferretti M, Lenza M, Wajchenberg M (2016) Quality assessment of systematic reviews for surgical treatment of low back pain: an overview. Spine J 16(5):667–675. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feise RJ, Michael Menke J (1976) Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine 26(1):78–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kapural L, Vrooman B, Sarwar S et al (2015) Radiofrequency intradiscal biacuplasty for treatment of discogenic lower back pain: a 12-month follow-up. Pain Med 16(3):425–431. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moon BJ, Lee HY, Kim KN et al (2015) Experimental evaluation of percutaneous lumbar laser disc decompression using a 1414 nm Nd:YAG laser. Pain Physician 18(6):E1091–E1099PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beyaz SG, Inanmaz ME, Zengin ES, Ulgen AM (2016) Combined use of high radiofrequency disk ablation, annulus modulation, and manual nucleotomy in a patient with extruded disk herniation. Pain Pract 16(5):74–80. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hellinger S (2014) Treatment of contained lumbar disc herniations using radiofrequency assisted micro-tubular decompression and nucleotomy: four year prospective study results. Int J Spine Surg 8:24.  10.14444/1024 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Manchikanti L, Falco FJ, Benyamin RM et al (2013) An update of the systematic assessment of mechanical lumbar disc decompression with nucleoplasty. Pain Physician 16(2 Suppl):SE25–SE54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ogbonnaya S, Kaliaperumal C, Qassim A, O’Sullivan M (2013) Outcome of nucleoplasty in patients with radicular pain due to lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. J Nat Sci Biol Med 4(1):187–190. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hui-yong Nie
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ya-bin Qi
    • 3
  • Na Li
    • 1
  • Suo-liang Wang
    • 1
  • Yong-xiao Cao
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation MedicineThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Department of PharmacologyXi’an Jiaotong University Health Science CenterXi’anChina
  3. 3.The Second Department of General SurgeryXi’an Ninth Hospital Affiliated to Medcal College of Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations