Abstract
Introduction
The goal of this prospective study was to assess the reliability of pre-operative cross-sectional imaging for the diagnosis of long head of biceps (LHB) tendinopathy in patients with a rotator cuff tear.
Methods
Cross-sectional imaging with MRI or CT arthrography data from 25 patients operated upon because of a rotator cuff tear between 1 October 2015 and 1 April 2016 was analysed by one experienced orthopaedic surgeon, one experienced radiologist and one orthopaedic resident. The analysis consisted of determining whether the LHB was present, the extrinsic tendon abnormalities (dislocation, tendon coverage) and intrinsic abnormalities (fraying, inflammation, degeneration). These findings were then compared to intra-operative arthroscopy findings, which were used as the benchmark. The interobserver correlation between the three different examiners for the cross-sectional imaging analysis as well as the correlation between the imaging and arthroscopy data were determined.
Results
The correlation between the imaging and arthroscopy data was the highest (80%) for the determination of LHB dislocation from the bicipital groove. The other diagnostic elements (subluxation, coverage and tendon degeneration) were difficult to discern with preoperative imaging, and correlated poorly with the arthroscopy findings (45% to 65%). The interobserver correlation was moderate to strong for the diagnosis of extrinsic tendon abnormalities. It was low to moderate for intrinsic abnormalities.
Conclusion
Except for LHB dislocation, pre-operative imaging is not sufficient to make a reliable diagnosis of LHB tendinopathy. Arthroscopy remains the gold standard for the management of LHB tendinopathy, as diagnosed intra-operatively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahrens PM, Boileau P (2007) The long head of biceps and associated tendinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol 89(8):1001–1009. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19278
Jordan RW, Saithna A (2015) Physical examination tests and imaging studies based on arthroscopic assessment of the long head of biceps tendon are invalid. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3862-7
Taylor SA, Newman AM, Nguyen J, Fabricant PD, Baret NJ, Shorey M, Ramkumar P, O'Brien SJ (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging currently fails to fully evaluate the biceps-Labrum complex and Bicipital tunnel. Arthroscopy 32(2):238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.008
Boileau P, Baque F, Valerio L, Ahrens P, Chuinard C, Trojani C (2007) Isolated arthroscopic biceps tenotomy or tenodesis improves symptoms in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):747–757. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01097
Nourissat G, Tribot-Laspiere Q, Aim F, Radier C (2014) Contribution of MRI and CT arthrography to the diagnosis of intra-articular tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(8 Suppl):S391–S394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.09.005
Skendzel JG, Jacobson JA, Carpenter JE, Miller BS (2011) Long head of biceps brachii tendon evaluation: accuracy of preoperative ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(4):942–948. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5012
De Maeseneer M, Boulet C, Pouliart N, Kichouh M, Buls N, Verhelle F, De Mey J, Shahabpour M (2012) Assessment of the long head of the biceps tendon of the shoulder with 3T magnetic resonance arthrography and CT arthrography. Eur J Radiol 81(5):934–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.121
Tadros AS, Huang BK, Wymore L, Hoenecke H, Fronek J, Chang EY (2015) Long head of the biceps brachii tendon: unenhanced MRI versus direct MR arthrography. Skelet Radiol 44(9):1263–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2152-2
Teefey SA, Rubin DA, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Leibold RA, Yamaguchi K (2004) Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(4):708–716
Taylor SA, Khair MM, Gulotta LV, Pearle AD, Baret NJ, Newman AM, Dy CJ, O'Brien SJ (2015) Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy fails to fully evaluate the biceps-labral complex. Arthroscopy 31(2):215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.10.017
Szabo I, Boileau P, Walch G (2008) The proximal biceps as a pain generator and results of tenotomy. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 16(3):180–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181824f1e
Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Gerber C, Hodler J (1998) Tendinopathy and rupture of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii muscle: evaluation with MR arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170(6):1557–1561. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.6.9609174
Mohtadi NG, Vellet AD, Clark ML, Hollinshead RM, Sasyniuk TM, Fick GH, Burton PJ (2004) A prospective, double-blind comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the evaluation of patients presenting with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elb Surg 13(3):258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058274604000205
Armstrong A, Teefey SA, Wu T, Clark AM, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K, Galatz LM (2006) The efficacy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of long head of the biceps tendon pathology. J Shoulder Elb Surg 15(1):7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.04.008
Drolet P, Martineau A, Lacroix R, Roy JS (2016) Reliability of ultrasound evaluation of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Rehabil Med 48(6):554–558. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2095
Razmjou H, Fournier-Gosselin S, Christakis M, Pennings A, ElMaraghy A, Holtby R (2016) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting biceps pathology in patients with rotator cuff disorders: comparison with arthroscopy. J Shoulder Elb Surg 25(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.020
Malavolta EA, Assuncao JH, Guglielmetti CL, de Souza FF, Gracitelli ME, Ferreira Neto AA (2015) Accuracy of preoperative MRI in the diagnosis of disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon. Eur J Radiol 84(11):2250–2254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.031
Charousset C, Bellaiche L, Duranthon LD, Grimberg J (2005) Accuracy of CT arthrography in the assessment of tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol 87(6):824–828. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.15836
Boileau P, Maynou C, Balestro JC, Brassart N, Clavert P, Cotten A, Gosselin O, Lespagnol F, Jacquot N, Walch G (2007) Long head of the biceps pathology. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 93(8 Suppl):5S19–5S53
Festa A, Allert J, Issa K, Tasto JP, Myer JJ (2014) Visualization of the extra-articular portion of the long head of the biceps tendon during intra-articular shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 30(11):1413–1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.044
Rosas S, Krill MK, Amoo-Achampong K, Kwon K, Nwachukwu BU, McCormick F (2017) A practical, evidence-based, comprehensive (PEC) physical examination for diagnosing pathology of the long head of the biceps. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(8):1484–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.002
Taylor SA, Newman AM, Dawson C, Gallagher KA, Bowers A, Nguyen J, Fabricant PD, O'Brien SJ (2017) The "3-pack" examination is critical for comprehensive evaluation of the biceps-Labrum complex and the Bicipital tunnel: a prospective study. Arthroscopy 33(1):28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.015
Sandrey MA (2013) Special physical examination tests for superior labrum anterior-posterior shoulder tears: an examination of clinical usefulness. J Athl Train 48(6):856–858. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.14
Gartsman GM (1996) Arthroscopic assessment of rotator cuff tear reparability. Arthroscopy 12(5):546–549
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Joanne Archambault, PhD for her editorial assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Morgane Rol and Julien Berhouet: none.
Luc Favard: Tornier® consultant.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rol, M., Favard, L. & Berhouet, J. Diagnosis of long head of biceps tendinopathy in rotator cuff tear patients: correlation of imaging and arthroscopy data. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 42, 1347–1355 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3616-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3616-x