Abstract
Purpose
Loss of a fourth digit below the level of the proximal phalanx results in a weakened grip, loss of skilled movements, and the amputation stump is repeatedly traumatized. Transposition of an adjacent fifth digital ray can improve hand function and cosmetic appearance by closing the gap created by the missing digit. Digital ray amputation is not a commonly performed procedure. However, when performed correctly it can dramatically improve hand function and cosmesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and aesthetic results of the fifth ray radial translation and intercarpal arthrodesis in mutilating ring finger injuries.
Materials and methods
In this retrospective study, nine consecutive patients who sustained mutilating ring finger injury were managed by fourth ray amputation with fifth ray transposition between January 2008 and December 2014. There were six males and three females with a mean age of 30.2 ± 12.2 years (age range, 16–56 years) at the time of surgery who underwent delayed fourth ray amputation with fifth ray transposition (after 14 days of injury). Eight cases had undergone previous surgical interventions: three ORIF using intramedullary K-wire fixation, one failed reimplantation, four debridement and application of split thickness skin graft. Primary skin closure of the amputated finger was not considered as previous surgery (one patient).
Results
All patients were followed up for a mean period of 17.1 ± 4.1 months (range, 12–24 months). Grip strength and RAS score improved after fourth ray resection. The postoperative grip strength and RAS (score) were not compromised by the associated hand dominance.
Conclusion
The following conclusions can be made despite the fact that this was a limited study as well as a retrospective analysis: 1-In technical terms, resection of the fourth ray with transposition of the small finger with a wedge-shaped hamate-capitate arthrodesis secured by screw fixation is easier than metacarpal osteotomy/transposition and less liable to post-operative complications. 2-The results of this study suggest that fourth ray resection and transposition of the small finger with a hamate-capitate arthrodesis restores hand function and cosmetics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chang D-H, Ye S-Y, Chien L-C, Ma H (2015) Epidemiology of digital amputation and replantation in Taiwan: a population-based study. J Chin Med Assoc 78:597–602
Ootes D, Lambers KT, Ring DC (2012) The epidemiology of upper extremity injuries presenting to the emergency department in the United States. HAND 7:18–22
Le Viet D (1988) Transposition of the fifth digital ray by intracarpal osteotomy. In: Tubiana R (ed) The hand, vol III. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1071–81
Bunnell S (1944) Surgery of the hand. Lippincott, Philadelphia, p 478
Fess EE, Moran CA (1981). Clinical assessment recommendations booklet. American Society of Hand Therapists, Garner, NC
Hamilton GF, McDonald C, Chenier TC (1992) J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 16(5):215–219
Colen L, Bunkis J, Gordon L, Walton R (1985) Functional assessment of ray transfer for central digital loss. J Hand Surg 10A:232–7
Napier JR (1956) The prehensile movements of the human hand. J Bone Joint Surg 38B:902–913
Long C, Conrad E, Hall A, Furler SL (1970) Intrinsic-extrinsic muscle control of the hand in power grip and precision handling: an electromyographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(2):853–67
Peimer CA, Wheeler DR, Barrett A, Goldschmidt PG (1999) Hand function following single ray amputation. J Hand Surg 24(6):1245–8
Levy HJ (1999) Ring finger ray amputation: a 25 year follow up. Am J Orthop 28(6):359–60
Carroll RE (1959) Transposition of the index finger to replace the middle finger. Clin Orthop 15:27–34
Pedrazzini A, Calderazzi F, Bertoni N, Ceccarelli F (2008) Cosmetic amputation of the fourth ray as possible outcome of the traumatic amputation of the ring finger injury: a case report. Acta Biomed 79(3):227–32
Nuzumlali E, Orhun E, Ozturk K, Cepel S, Polatkan S (2003) Results of ray resection and ampuation for ring avulsion injuries at the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg 28(6):578–81
Foucher G, Blauvelt R (1997) Indications for reconstruction in finger mutilations. In: Foucher G (ed) Reconstructive surgery in hand mutilation. Martin Dunitz, London, pp 121–31
Allende BT, Engelem JC (1980) Tension band arthrodesis in the finger joint. J Hand Surg 5:269–71
Segmuller G (1977) Surgical stabilization of the skeleton of the hand. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 42–59
Baruch A, Kahanovich S (1980) Angulated bone peg. Plast Reconstr Surg 66(3):471–3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
There is no funding source.
Ethical approval
The presented study was approved by the Ethical Committee
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monreal, R. Reconstructive surgery of the amputated ring finger. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1617–1622 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3411-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3411-8