Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of dual mobility cups in a young Middle Eastern population and its influence on life style

  • Orthopaedic Heritage
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dual mobility cups (DMC) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) are becoming popular among orthopaedic surgeons. Substantial benefit of their use has been reported among high risk patients, particularly in reducing post-operative hip instability (dislocation). Many reports stated some concern when implanted in young and active people where complications such as polyethylene wear and mechanical loosening could potentially be higher. This Middle Eastern study analyses a retrospective series of THA for any aetiology other than infection, using DMC for the acetabular component in 75 patients (85 implants) less than 70 years old. No instability, intra-prosthetic dislocation or mechanical failure was reported during a mean follow-up of five years. The only major complication was a post-operative infection. The mean post- operative modified Harris hip score was 97.1 out of 100. All patients resumed their daily activities and all religious practicing patients were able to accomplish their prayer positions without pain. DMC is found to be an interesting option in reducing dislocation events in young patients. Those excellent short-term results would encourage surgeons to use DMC in an active and highly demanding population. Further research is necessary to confirm maintenance of such results at long term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernd R, Doyle Y, Grundy E, McKee M (2009) How can health systems respond to population ageing? Heath Systems And Policy Analysis, WHO. ISSN 1997-8073

  2. Nho SJ, Kymes SM, Callaghan JJ, Felson DT (2013) The burden of hip osteoarthritis in the United States: epidemiologic and economic considerations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(Suppl 1):S1–S6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dotinga R (2015) Number of hips replacements has skyrocketed, U.S Reports. Health Day, https://consumer.healthday.com/senior-citizen-information-31/demographic-arthritis-news-37/number-of-hip-replacements-has-skyrocketed-u-s-report-shows-696419.html

  4. Bozic K, Kurtz S, Vail T, Berry D (2009) The Epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):128–133. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register; Annual Report 2009; http://www.shpr.se/ Libraries

  6. Australian Orthopaedic Association; 2011 Annual Report Hip and Knee Replacement http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr

  7. De Martino I, Konstantinos G, Sculo P, Sculo T (2014) Dual mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty. World J Ortho 5(3):180–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Verdier R (2013) Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up. IntOrthop 37(12):2345–2350

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leclercq S, Lemarechal P, Richter D, Aubriot JH (1999) Prothèses totales de hanche hybrides Charnley-Bousquet à plus de 10 ans. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 85 :Suppl 3

  10. Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Aslanian T, Verdier R (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38(6):1125–9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lachiewicz PF, Watters TS (2012) The use of dual-mobility components in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(8):481–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Combes A, Migaud H, Girard J, Duhamel A, Fessy MH (2013) Low rate of dislocation of dual mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(12):3891–3900

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Philippot R, Farizon F, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, Derhi G, Bonnan J, Fessy MH, Lecuire F (2008) Survival of cementless dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94(8):e23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vielpeau C, Lebel B, Ardouin L, Burdin G, Lautridou C (2011) The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases. IntOrthop 35(2):225–230

    Google Scholar 

  15. Epinette JA, Beracassat R, Tracol P, Pagazani P, Vandenbussche E (2014) Are modern dual mobility cups a valuable option in reducing instability after primary hip arthroplasty, even in younger patients? J Arthroplasty 29(6):1323–1328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fessy MH (2006) Dual mobility: A Stéphanois concept (St Etienne area, France). Maitrise Orthopedique March 152

  17. Lautridou C, Lebel B, Burdin G, Vielpeau C (2008) Survival of the cementless Bousquet dual mobility cup: minimum 15-year follow-up of 437 total hip arthroplasties. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94:731–739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Leclercq S, Benoit JY, de Rosa JP, Euvrard P, Leteurtre C, Girardin P (2008) Results of the Evora dual-mobility socket after a minimum follow-up of five years. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94(8):e17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bouchet R, Mercier N, Saragaglia D (2011) Posterior approach and dislocation rate: a 213 total hip replacements case-control study comparing the dual mobility cup with a conventional 28-mm metal head/polyethylene prosthesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:2–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Puch JM, Derhi G, Descamps L, Verdier R, Caton JH (2016) Dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty five years and over ten years of follow-up: a prospective and comparative series. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-016-3325-x

  21. Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2004) The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:9–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Farizon F, de LAvison R, Azoulai JJ, Bousquet G (1998) Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility. A twelve-year follow-up study. IntOrthop 22(4):219–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, Adam P, Farizon F (2009) The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop 33(4):927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F (2012) Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. IntOrthop 36:511–518

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF (2002) Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:1788–1792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D (2006) An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:19–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leiber-Wackenheim F, Brunschweiler B, Ehlinger M (2011) Treatment of recurrent THR dislocation using of a cementless dual-mobility cup: a 59 cases series with a mean 8 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:8–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Langlais FL, Ropars M, Gaucher F, Musset T, Chaix O (2008) Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(2):389–395

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Prudhon JL, Steffann F, Ferreira A, Verdier R, Aslanian T, Caton J (2014) Cementless dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision. Int Orthop 38(12):2463–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Iorio R, Healy WL, Lemos DW, Appleby D, Lucchesi CA, Saleh KJ (2001) Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: outcomes and cost effectiveness. Clin Orthop Relat Res 383:229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tarasevicius S, Busevicius M, Robertsson O, Wingstrand H (2010) Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation rate after arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:175

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Adam P, Philippe R, Ehlinger M, Roche O, Bonnomet F, Molé D, Fessy MH (2012) Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:296–300. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2012.01.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaissar Yammine.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Ethical approval

Consent obtained for each patient. Approval from the ethical boards of our institutions was obtained.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Assi, C., El-Najjar, E., Samaha, C. et al. Outcomes of dual mobility cups in a young Middle Eastern population and its influence on life style. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 619–624 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3390-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3390-1

Keywords

Navigation