Abstract
Purpose
The posterior malleolar fracture (PMF) in tibial spiral fractures are a common type of complication that occurs in tibial fractures. However, the indication of fixation for posterior fractures is still under debate and varies between different surgeons’. It is not unusual to find the smaller PMF (<25%), which could be treated conservatively within guidelines, treated with internal fixation in clinic. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of tibial spiral fractures with PMF and provide proper guidance for the treatment of this special fracture.
Methods
A total of 284 cases of spiral fractures combined with PMF were collected and analyzed. Demographic data, fragment size (classified by 25% involvement of ankle joint), time to weight-bearing and functional scores post-operatively were recorded. The ankle-hindfoot scale of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), a visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, assessment of dorsiflexion restriction and arthritis scale were used as the main evaluations.
Results
Forty patients with a larger PMF (≥25%) and 72 with smaller ones (<25%) were fixed and categorized as the fixation group (FG). In the nonfixation group (NG), the corresponding numbers were four and 168 patients respectively. A total of 279 PMF were classified as large posterolateral triangular fragment carrying the posterior half of the fibular notch and intra-incisural posterolateral fragment involving one-fourth to one-third of the fibular notch. However, no obvious differences were observed in terms of the clinical outcomes in PMF involving one-fourth to one-third of the fibular notch. In the treatment of smaller PMF (<25%) of this type, there were no obvious differences in the functional outcomes between fixed (SF) and nonfixed PMF (SN).
Conclusions
Many patients with smaller PMFs were fixated, but functional outcomes of SF were not better than those of SN. There is no need to emphasize other factors guiding the treatment of PMF involving one-fourth to one-third of the fibular notch in spiral fractures. The traditional size of PMF may be only enough to guide the treatment of spiral fracture with PMF. But other types of PMF should still be treated considering morphology and fragment simultaneously.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Larsen P, Elsoe R, Hansen SH, Graven-Nielsen T, Laessoe U, Rasmussen S (2015) Incidence and epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures. Injury 46(4):746–750
Hou Z, Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Li S, Pan J, Wu H (2009) A occult and regular combination injury: the posterior malleolar fracture associated with spiral tibial shaft fracture. J Trauma 66(5):1385–1390
Hou Z, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Yao S, Pan J, Irgit K, Zhang Y (2012) The “communication line” suggests occult posterior malleolar fracture associated with a spiral tibial shaft fracture. Eur J Radiol 81(3):594–597
Langenhuijsen JF, Heetveld MJ, Ultee JM, Steller EP, Butzelaar RM (2002) Results of ankle fractures with involvement of the posterior tibial margin. J Trauma 53(1):55–60
Erdem MN, Erken HY, Burc H, Saka G, Korkmaz MF, Aydogan M (2014) Comparison of lag screw versus buttress plate fixation of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int 35(10):1022–1030
Raasch W, Larkin J, Draganich L (1992) Assessment of the posterior malleolus as a restraint toposterior subluxation of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74(8):1201–1206
Evers J, Barz L, Wähnert D, Grüneweller N, Raschke MJ, Ochman S (2015) Size matters: the influence of the posterior fragment on patient outcomes in trimalleolar ankle fractures. Injury 46:S109–S113
Rammelt S, Heim D, Hofbauer L, Grass R, Zwipp H (2011) Problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures. Unfallchirurg 114(10):847–860
Büchler L, Tannast M, Bonel HM, Weber M (2009) Reliability of radiologic assessment of the fracture anatomy at the posterior tibial plafond in malleolar fractures. J Orthop Trauma 23(3):208–212
Gardner MJ, Streubel PN, McCormick JJ, Klein SE, Johnson JE, Ricci WM (2011) Surgeon practices regarding operative treatment of posterior malleolus fractures. Foot Ankle Int 32(4):385–393
Irwin TA, Lien J, Kadakia AR (2013) Posterior malleolus fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(1):32–40
Xu H-l, Li X, Zhang D-Y, Fu Z-G, Wang T-B, Zhang P-X, Jiang B-G, Shen H-l, Wang G, Wang G-l (2012) A retrospective study of posterior malleolus fractures. Int Orthop 36(9):1929–1936
Haraguchi N, Haruyama H, Toga H, Kato F (2006) Pathoanatomy of posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(5):1085–1092. doi:10.2106/jbjs.e.00856
Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Kostlivý K, Vaněček V, Klika D, Trešl I (2015) Anatomy and classification of the posterior tibial fragment in ankle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(4):505–516. doi:10.1007/s00402-015-2171-4
Meijer DT, de Muinck Keizer R-JO, Doornberg JN, Sierevelt IN, Stufkens SA, Kerkhoffs GM, van Dijk CN (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of 2-dimensional computed tomography for articular involvement and fracture pattern of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int 37(1):75–82
Odak S, Ahluwalia R, Unnikrishnan P, Hennessy M, Platt S (2016) Management of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg 55(1):140–145
Mangnus L, Meijer DT, Stufkens SA, Mellema JJ, Steller EP, Kerkhoffs GM, Doornberg JN (2015) Posterior malleolar fracture patterns. J Orthop Trauma 29(9):428–435
De Vries J, Wijgman A, Sierevelt I, Schaap G (2005) Long-term results of ankle fractures with a posterior malleolar fragment. J Foot Ankle Surg 44(3):211–217
Mingo-Robinet J, López-Durán L, Galeote JE, Martinez-Cervell C (2011) Ankle fractures with posterior malleolar fragment: management and results. J Foot Ankle Surg 50(2):141–145
Simanski CJ, Maegele MG, Lefering R, Lehnen DM, Kawel N, Riess P, Yücel N, Tiling T, Bouillon B (2006) Functional treatment and early weightbearing after an ankle fracture: a prospective study. J Orthop Trauma 20(2):108–114
Gul A, Batra S, Mehmood S, Gillham N (2007) Immediate unprotected weight-bearing of operatively treated ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 73(3):360
Dehghan N, McKee MD, Jenkinson RJ, Schemitsch EH, Stas V, Nauth A, Hall JA, Stephen DJ, Kreder HJ (2016) Early weightbearing and range of motion versus non-weightbearing and immobilization after open reduction and internal fixation of unstable ankle fractures: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma 30(7):345–352
Piątkowski K, Piekarczyk P, Kwiatkowski K, Przybycień M, Chwedczuk B (2015) Comparison of different locking plate fixation methods in distal tibia fractures. Int Orthop 39(11):2245–51. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2906-4
Zhou Y, Wang Y, Liu L, Zhou Z, Cao X (2015) Locking compression plate as an external fixator in the treatment of closed distal tibial fractures. Int Orthop 39(11):2227–37. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2903-7
Palmanovich E, Brin YS, Laver L, Kish B, Nyska M, Hetsroni I (2014) The effect of minimally displaced posterior malleolar fractures on decision making in minimally displaced lateral malleolus fractures. Int Orthop 38(5):1051–6. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2224-7
Acknowledgements
JLG searched the literature and wrote the manuscript. YZZ designed the study. LL collected the data. ZYY analyzed the data. ZYH and WC interpreted the data. This study has not been presented in any meeting.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
There is no funding source.
Ethical approval
This article is a retrospective study containing human participants performed by the authors. Ethical approval is uploaded separately.
Informed consent
Informed and verbal consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, J., Liu, L., Yang, Z. et al. The treatment options for posterior malleolar fractures in tibial spiral fractures. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1935–1943 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3388-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3388-8