International Orthopaedics

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 645–659 | Cite as

The evolution of outcomes and indications for the dual-mobility cup: a systematic review

  • Cécile Batailler
  • Camdon Fary
  • Régis Verdier
  • Thierry Aslanian
  • Jacques Caton
  • Sebastien LustigEmail author
Review Article



Instability following total hip arthroplasty remains a common and disabling complication. The dual mobility cup (DMC) allows a reduction in the dislocation rate. An increasing number of studies have been undertaken to better understand DMC long term outcomes and complications. The goal of this systematic review was to clarify its different uses and outcomes according to the indications.


A comprehensive literature review was performed using the keywords ‘dual mobility’ and ‘tripolar cup’ with no limit regarding the year of publication. One hundred seventy six publications were identified.


Current literature shows that “contemporary” dual mobility cup are a significant indication to manage instability following primary and revision hip arthroplasty. Survivorship at midterm is comparable to other articulations for primary THA, but is more difficult to evaluate in revision. Intra-prosthetic dislocation, wear, and loosening are now uncommon with new generations of DMC.


Compared to previous generations of DMC, the current “contemporary” DMC presents a significant improvement. Current literature reveals a tendency to increase the indications but further studies with long term follow up remain important to consolidate these findings.


Dislocation Dual mobility cup Loosening Revision surgery Total hip arthroplasty 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

CB: No conflict of interest.

CF: Consultant for Amplitude, Institutional research support from Medacta and Stryker.

TA and RV: Employee of Groupe Lepine®.

JC: No conflict of interest.

SL: Consultant for Smith & Nephew and Medacta, Institutional research support from Tornier-Wright and Amplitude.


There is no funding source.

Ethical approval

No procedure in this study has involved human participants.


  1. 1.
    Patel PD, Potts A, Froimson MI (2007) The dislocating hip arthroplasty: prevention and treatment. J Arthroplasty 22(4 Suppl 1):86–90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.111 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delaunay C, Hamadouche M, Girard J, Duhamel A, So FG (2013) What are the causes for failures of primary hip arthroplasties in France? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(12):3863–3869. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2935-5 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bousquet G, Argenson C, Godeneche JL, Cisterne JP, Gazielly DF, Girardin P, Debiesse JL (1986) Recovery after aseptic loosening of cemented total hip arthroplasties with Bousquet’s cementless prosthesis. Apropos of 136 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 72(Suppl 2):70–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aubriot JH, Lesimple P, Leclercq S (1993) Study of Bousquet’s non-cemented acetabular implant in 100 hybrid total hip prostheses (Charnley type cemented femoral component). Average 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg 59(Suppl 1):267–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Farizon F, de Lavison R, Azoulai JJ, Bousquet G (1998) Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility. A twelve-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 22(4):219–224PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Carret JP, Bejui-Hugues J (2007) Unconstrained tripolar implants for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at risk for dislocation. J Arthroplasty 22(6):849–858. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.014 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Philippot R, Farizon F, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, Derhi G, Bonnan J, Fessy MH, Lecuire F (2008) Survival of cementless dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94(8):e23–e27. doi: 10.1016/j.rco.2007.10.013 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leclercq S, Benoit JY, de Rosa JP, Euvrard P, Leteurtre C, Girardin P (2008) Results of the Evora dual-mobility socket after a minimum follow-up of five years. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94(8):e17–e22. doi: 10.1016/j.rco.2007.10.015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bauchu P, Bonnard O, Cypres A, Fiquet A, Girardin P, Noyer D (2008) The dual-mobility POLARCUP: first results from a multicenter study. Orthopedics 31(12 Suppl 2)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bouchet R, Mercier N, Saragaglia D (2011) Posterior approach and dislocation rate: a 213 total hip replacements case–control study comparing the dual mobility cup with a conventional 28-mm metal head/polyethylene prosthesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(1):2–7. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.07.008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vielpeau C, Lebel B, Ardouin L, Burdin G, Lautridou C (2011) The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases. Int Orthop 35(2):225–230. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1156-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prudhon JL (2011) Dual-mobility cup and cemented femoral component: 6 year follow-up results. Hip Int 21(6):713–717. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2011.8846 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hamadouche M, Arnould H, Bouxin B (2012) Is a cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(11):3048–3053. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2395-3 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F (2012) Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop 36(3):511–518. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1289-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leclercq S, Benoit JY, de Rosa JP, Tallier E, Leteurtre C, Girardin PH (2013) Evora(R) chromium-cobalt dual mobility socket: results at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(8):923–928. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.07.017 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Combes A, Migaud H, Girard J, Duhamel A, Fessy MH (2013) Low rate of dislocation of dual-mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(12):3891–3900. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2929-3 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Verdier R (2013) Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up. Int Orthop 37(12):2345–2350. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2067-2 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Philippot R, Meucci JF, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Modern dual-mobility cup implanted with an uncemented stem: about 100 cases with 12-year follow-up. Surg Technol Int 23:208–212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Aslanian T, Verdier R (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38(6):1125–1129. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2313-2 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mohammed R, Hayward K, Mulay S, Bindi F, Wallace M (2015) Outcomes of dual-mobility acetabular cup for instability in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 16(1):9–13. doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0324-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Epinette JA (2015) Clinical outcomes, survivorship and adverse events with mobile-bearings versus fixed-bearings in hip arthroplasty-a prospective comparative cohort study of 143 ADM versus 130 trident cups at 2 to 6-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 30(2):241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.022 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vigdorchik JM, D’Apuzzo MR, Markel DC, Malkani AL, Raterman S, Sharpe KP, Cornell CN, Westrich GH (2015) Lack of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty with a new dual mobility acetabular design. Hip Int 25(1):34–38. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000186 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vermersch T, Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy MH (2015) Prospective longitudinal study of one hundred patients with total hip arthroplasty using a second-generation cementless dual-mobility cup. Int Orthop 39(11):2097–2101. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2985-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chughtai M, Mistry JB, Diedrich AM, Jauregui JJ, Elmallah RK, Bonutti PM, Harwin SF, Malkani AL, Kolisek FR, Mont MA (2016) Low frequency of early complications with dual-mobility acetabular cups in cementless primary THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(10):2181–2187. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4811-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Massin P, Orain V, Philippot R, Farizon F, Fessy MH (2012) Fixation failures of dual mobility cups: a mid-term study of 2601 hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(7):1932–1940. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2213-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Small SR, Berend ME, Howard LA, Rogge RD, Buckley CA, Ritter MA (2013) High initial stability in porous titanium acetabular cups: a biomechanical study. J Arthroplasty 28(3):510–516. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.035 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Manley MT, Capello WN, D’Antonio JA, Edidin AA, Geesink RG (1998) Fixation of acetabular cups without cement in total hip arthroplasty. A comparison of three different implant surfaces at a minimum duration of follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(8):1175–1185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Netter JD, Hermida JC, Chen PC, Nevelos JE, D’Lima DD (2014) Effect of microseparation and third-body particles on dual-mobility crosslinked hip liner wear. J Arthroplasty 29(9):1849–1853. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.010 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Malatray M, Roux JP, Gunst S, Pibarot V, Wegrzyn J (2016) Highly crosslinked polyethylene: a safe alternative to conventional polyethylene for dual mobility cup mobile component. A biomechanical validation. Int Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3334-9 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Prudhon JL, Desmarchelier R, Hamadouche M, Delaunay C, Verdier R, SoFcot (2015) Causes for revision of dual-mobility and standard primary total hip arthroplasty : matched case–control study based on a prospective multicenter study of two thousand and forty four implants. Int Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3064-4 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Karrholm J (2012) The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 83:442–448. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.733919 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jakobsen T, Kappel A, Hansen F, Krarup N (2014) The dislocating hip replacement—revision with a dual mobility cup in 56 consecutive patients. Open Orthop J 8:268–271. doi: 10.2174/1874325001408010268
  33. 33.
    Mukka SS, Mahmood SS, Sjoden GO, Sayed-Noor AS (2013) Dual mobility cups for preventing early hip arthroplasty dislocation in patients at risk: experience in a county hospital. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 5(2):48–51. doi: 10.4081/or.2013.e10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    van Heumen M, Heesterbeek PJ, Swierstra BA, Van Hellemondt GG, Goosen JH (2015) Dual mobility acetabular component in revision total hip arthroplasty for persistent dislocation: no dislocations in 50 hips after 1–5 years. J Orthop Traumatol 16(1):15–20. doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0318-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):128–133. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00155 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF (2002) Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(10):1788–1792Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D (2006) An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:19–23. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218752.22613.78 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Phillips CB, Barrett JA, Losina E, Mahomed NN, Lingard EA, Guadagnoli E, Baron JA, Harris WH, Poss R, Katz JN (2003) Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(1):20–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Langlais FL, Ropars M, Gaucher F, Musset T, Chaix O (2008) Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(2):389–395. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0047-9 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, Chevillotte C, Bejui-Hugues J (2009) Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(2):465–472. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0476-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Philippot R, Adam P, Reckhaus M, Delangle F, Verdot F, Curvale G, Farizon F (2009) Prevention of dislocation in total hip revision surgery using a dual mobility design. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95(6):407–413. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.016 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Massin P, Besnier L (2010) Acetabular revision using a press-fit dual mobility cup. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96(1):9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.rcot.2009.11.006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hamadouche M, Biau DJ, Huten D, Musset T, Gaucher F (2010) The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(12):3248–3254. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1404-7 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Leiber-Wackenheim F, Brunschweiler B, Ehlinger M, Gabrion A, Mertl P (2011) Treatment of recurrent THR dislocation using of a cementless dual-mobility cup: a 59 cases series with a mean 8 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(1):8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.08.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schneider L, Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2011) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(8):807–813. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.09.010 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Civinini R, Carulli C, Matassi F, Nistri L, Innocenti M (2012) A dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(12):3542–3548. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2428-y PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pattyn C, Audenaert E (2012) Early complications after revision total hip arthroplasty with cemented dual-mobility socket and reinforcement ring. Acta Orthop Belg 78(3):357–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mertl P, Combes A, Leiber-Wackenheim F, Fessy MH, Girard J, Migaud H (2012) Recurrence of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty revision using dual mobility cups was rare in 180 hips followed over 7 years. HSS J 8(3):251–256. doi: 10.1007/s11420-012-9301-0 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Saragaglia D, Ruatti S, Refaie R (2013) Relevance of a press-fit dual mobility cup to deal with recurrent dislocation of conventional total hip arthroplasty: a 29-case series. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23(4):431–436. doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1002-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wegrzyn J, Pibarot V, Jacquel A, Carret JP, Bejui-Hugues J, Guyen O (2014) Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull cross-plate, structural allograft and cemented dual-mobility cup in revision THA at a minimum 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 29(2):432–437. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.030 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Prudhon JL, Steffann F, Ferreira A, Verdier R, Aslanian T, Caton J (2014) Cementless dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision. Int Orthop 38(12):2463–2468. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2448-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wegrzyn J, Tebaa E, Jacquel A, Carret JP, Bejui-Hugues J, Pibarot V (2015) Can dual mobility cups prevent dislocation in all situations after revision total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 30(4):631–640. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.034 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Snir N, Park BK, Garofolo G, Marwin SE (2015) Revision of failed hip resurfacing and large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty using dual-mobility components. Orthopedics 38(6):369–374. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150603-04 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Simian E, Chatellard R, Druon J, Berhouet J, Rosset P (2015) Dual mobility cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: dislocation rate and survival after 5 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101(5):577–581. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.05.002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Carulli C, Macera A, Matassi F, Civinini R, Innocenti M (2016) The use of a dual mobility cup in the management of recurrent dislocations of hip hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 17(2):131–136. doi: 10.1007/s10195-015-0365-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Jauregui JJ, Pierce TP, Elmallah RK, Cherian JJ, Delanois RE, Mont MA (2016) Dual mobility cups: an effective prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasties for preventing dislocations. Hip Int 26(1):57–61. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000295 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Plummer DR, Botero HG, Berend KR, Pritchett JW, Lombardi AV, Della Valle CJ (2016) Salvage of monoblock metal-on-metal acetabular components using a dual-mobility bearing. J Arthroplasty 31(4):846–849. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.016 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Haen TX, Lonjon G, Vandenbussche E (2015) Can cemented dual-mobility cups be used without a reinforcement device in cases of mild acetabular bone stock alteration in total hip arthroplasty? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101(8):923–927. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.027 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Plummer DR, Christy JM, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, Della Valle CJ (2016) Dual-mobility articulations for patients at high risk for dislocation. J Arthroplasty 31(9 Suppl):131–135. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.021 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Dangin A, Boulat S, Farizon F, Philippot R (2016) Prevention of dislocation risk during hip revision surgery with the dual mobility concept; study of a new generation of dual mobility cups. Surg Technol Int XXIX:314–319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hamadouche M, Ropars M, Rodaix C, Musset T, Gaucher F, Biau D, Courpied JP, Huten D (2016) Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Int Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3343-8 Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Knudsen R, Ovesen O, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Overgaard S (2007) Constrained liners for recurrent dislocations in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 17(2):78–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Khan RJ, Fick D, Alakeson R, Haebich S, de Cruz M, Nivbrant B, Wood D (2006) A constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88(7):870–876. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B7.17644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Shrader MW, Parvizi J, Lewallen DG (2003) The use of a constrained acetabular component to treat instability after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(11):2179–2183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kerboull M, Hamadouche M, Kerboull L (2000) The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 378:155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bostrom MP, Lehman AP, Buly RL, Lyman S, Nestor BJ (2006) Acetabular revision with the Contour antiprotrusio cage: 2- to 5-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:188–194. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000246533.37006.b0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Pieringer H, Auersperg V, Bohler N (2006) Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone-deficiency: the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(4):489–496. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.016 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kawanabe K, Akiyama H, Onishi E, Nakamura T (2007) Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89(1):26–31. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B1.18037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Berry DJ, Muller ME (1992) Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 74(5):711–715Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lecuire F, Benareau I, Rubini J, Basso M (2004) Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the Bousquet dual mobility socket. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 90(3):249–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Langlois J, El Hage S, Hamadouche M (2014) Intraprosthetic dislocation: a potentially serious complication of dual mobility acetabular cups. Skelet Radiol 43(7):1013–1016. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-1824-7 Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Mohammed R, Cnudde P (2012) Severe metallosis owing to intraprosthetic dislocation in a failed dual-mobility cup primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27(3):493.e491–493.e4913. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(3):965–970. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2639-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, Adam P, Farizon F (2009) The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop 33(4):927–932. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0589-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Nebergall AK, Freiberg AA, Greene ME, Malchau H, Muratoglu O, Rowell S, Zumbrunn T, Varadarajan KM (2016) Analysis of dual mobility liner rim damage using retrieved components and cadaver models. J Arthroplasty 31(7):1595–1602. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.032 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Fabry C, Langlois J, Hamadouche M, Bader R (2016) Intra-prosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility cups after total hip arthroplasty: potential causes from a clinical and biomechanical perspective. Int Orthop 40(5):901–906. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3000-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Odland AN, Sierra RJ (2014) Intraprosthetic dislocation of a contemporary dual-mobility design used during conversion THA. Orthopedics 37(12):e1124–e1128. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20141124-90 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Stigbrand H, Ullmark G (2011) Component dissociation after closed reduction of dual mobility sockets—a report of three cases. Hip Int 21(2):263–266. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2011.6529
  79. 79.
    Loubignac F, Felts E, Allal R (2012) Early intraprosthetic dislocation of a total hip replacement with dual mobility socket: clinical presentation and update review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 22(Suppl 1):85–87. doi: 10.1007/s00590-011-0906-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Banzhof JA, Robbins CE, Ven A, Talmo CT, Bono JV (2013) Femoral head dislodgement complicating use of a dual mobility prosthesis for recurrent instability. J Arthroplast 28(3):543.e541–543.e543. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Banka TR, Ast MP, Parks ML (2014) Early intraprosthetic dislocation in a revision dual-mobility hip prosthesis. Orthopedics 37(4):e395–e397. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140401-63 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Fehring KA, Berry DJ (2016) Dissociation and intrapelvic entrapment of a dual-mobility polyethylene component. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(4):1072–1076. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4381-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Waddell BS, De Martino I, Sculco T, Sculco P (2016) Total hip arthroplasty dislocations are more complex than they appear: a case report of intraprosthetic dislocation of an anatomic dual-mobility implant after closed reduction. Ochsner J 16(2):185–190PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Puch JM, Derhi G, Descamps L, Verdier R, Caton JH (2016) Dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty five years and over ten years of follow-up: a prospective and comparative series. Int Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3325-x
  85. 85.
    Tarasevicius S, Busevicius M, Robertsson O, Wingstrand H (2010) Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation rate after arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:175. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-175 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Adam P, Philippe R, Ehlinger M, Roche O, Bonnomet F, Mole D, Fessy MH, French Society of Orthopaedic S, Traumatology (2012) Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(3):296–300. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.01.005 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Nich C, Vandenbussche E, Augereau B, Sadaka J (2016) Do dual-mobility cups reduce the risk of dislocation in total hip arthroplasty for fractured neck of femur in patients aged older than 75 years? J Arthroplasty 31(6):1256–1260. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.041 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Burgers PT, Van Geene AR, Van den Bekerom MP, Van Lieshout EM, Blom B, Aleem IS, Bhandari M, Poolman RW (2012) Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials. Int Orthop 36(8):1549–1560. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1569-7 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Yu L, Wang Y, Chen J (2012) Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(8):2235–2243. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2293-8 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Macaulay W, Nellans KW, Garvin KL, Iorio R, Healy WL, Rosenwasser MP, other members of the DC (2008) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: winner of the Dorr Award. J Arthroplasty 23(6 Suppl 1):2–8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.013 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Simon P, Gouin F, Veillard D, Laffargue P, Ehlinger M, Bel JC, Lopez R, Beaudet P, Luickx F, Molina V, Pidhorz LE, Bigorre N, Rochwerger A, Azam F, Louis ML, Cottias P, Hamonic S, Veillard D, Vogt F, Cambas PM, Tabutin J, Bonnevialle P, Lecoq M, Court C, Sitbon P, Lacoste S, Gagey O, Dujardin F, Gilleron M, Brzakala V, Roussignol X (2008) Femoral neck fractures in patients over 50 years old. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94(Suppl 6):S108–S132. doi: 10.1016/j.rco.2008.06.006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Bensen AS, Jakobsen T, Krarup N (2014) Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation and re-operation when used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures. Int Orthop 38(6):1241–1245. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2276-8 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Raphael BS, Dines JS, Akerman M, Root L (2010) Long-term followup of total hip arthroplasty in patients with cerebral palsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(7):1845–1854. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1167-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Schroeder K, Hauck C, Wiedenhofer B, Braatz F, Aldinger PR (2010) Long-term results of hip arthroplasty in ambulatory patients with cerebral palsy. Int Orthop 34(3):335–339. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0771-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Sanders RJ, Swierstra BA, Goosen JH (2013) The use of a dual-mobility concept in total hip arthroplasty patients with spastic disorders: no dislocations in a series of ten cases at midterm follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(7):1011–1016. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1759-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Morin C, Ursu C, Delecourt C (2016) Total hip replacement in young non-ambulatory cerebral palsy patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102(7):845–849. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.07.010 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Davis AM, Wood AM, Keenan AC, Brenkel IJ, Ballantyne JA (2011) Does body mass index affect clinical outcome post-operatively and at five years after primary unilateral total hip replacement performed for osteoarthritis? A multivariate analysis of prospective data. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93(9):1178–1182. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.26873 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Kim Y, Morshed S, Joseph T, Bozic K, Ries MD (2006) Clinical impact of obesity on stability following revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:142–146. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000246529.14135.2b PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Sadr Azodi O, Adami J, Lindstrom D, Eriksson KO, Wladis A, Bellocco R (2008) High body mass index is associated with increased risk of implant dislocation following primary total hip replacement: 2106 patients followed for up to 8 years. Acta Orthop 79(1):141–147. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014897
  100. 100.
    Maisongrosse P, Lepage B, Cavaignac E, Pailhe R, Reina N, Chiron P, Laffosse JM (2015) Obesity is no longer a risk factor for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with a double-mobility cup. Int Orthop 39(7):1251–1258. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2612-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Hernigou P, Trousselier M, Roubineau F, Bouthors C, Flouzat Lachaniette CH (2016) Dual-mobility or constrained liners are more effective than preoperative bariatric surgery in prevention of THA dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(10):2202–2210. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4859-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Hernigou P, Auregan JC, Potage D, Roubineau F, Flouzat Lachaniette CH, Dubory A (2016) Dual-mobility implants prevent hip dislocation following hip revision in obese patients. Int Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3316-y Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Sokolovski VA, Voloshin VP, Aliev MD, Zubikov VS, Saravanan SA, Martynenko DV, Nisichenko DV, Strelnikov KN (2006) Total hip replacement for proximal femoral tumours: our midterm results. Int Orthop 30(5):399–402. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0124-9 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Zehr RJ, Enneking WF, Scarborough MT (1996) Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 322:207–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Philippeau JM, Durand JM, Carret JP, Leclercq S, Waast D, Gouin F (2010) Dual mobility design use in preventing total hip replacement dislocation following tumor resection. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96(1):2–8. doi: 10.1016/j.rcot.2009.12.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Bus MP, Szafranski A, Sellevold S, Goryn T, Jutte PC, Bramer JA, Fiocco M, Streitburger A, Kotrych D, van de Sande MA, Dijkstra PD (2016) LUMiC(R) endoprosthetic reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection: short-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4805-4 Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Epinette JA, Beracassat R, Tracol P, Pagazani G, Vandenbussche E (2014) Are modern dual mobility cups a valuable option in reducing instability after primary hip arthroplasty, even in younger patients? J Arthroplasty 29(6):1323–1328. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Woo RY, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64(9):1295–1306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Hedlundh U, Hybbinette CH, Fredin H (1995) Influence of surgical approach on dislocations after Charnley hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10(5):609–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Tsukada S, Wakui M (2015) Lower dislocation rate following total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach than via posterior approach: five-year-average follow-up results. Open Orthop J 9:157–162. doi: 10.2174/1874325001509010157 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Prietzel T, Hammer N, Schleifenbaum S, Adler D, Pretzsch M, Kohler L, Petermann M, Farag M, Panzert S, Bauer S, von Salis-Soglio G (2014) The impact of capsular repair on the dislocation rate after primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of 1972 cases. Z Orthop Unfall 152(2):130–143. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1368209 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Hallert O, Li Y, Brismar H, Lindgren U (2012) The direct anterior approach: initial experience of a minimally invasive technique for total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 7:17. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-7-17 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Homma Y, Baba T, Kobayashi H, Desroches A, Ochi H, Ozaki Y, Matsumoto M, Yuasa T, Kaneko K (2016) Benefit and risk in short term after total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach combined with dual mobility cup. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26(6):619–624. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1808-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Batailler C, Fary C, Batailler P, Servien E, Neyret P, Lustig S (2016) Total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach and dual mobility cup: safe and efficient strategy against post-operative dislocation. Int Orthop. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3333-x Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cécile Batailler
    • 1
  • Camdon Fary
    • 1
  • Régis Verdier
    • 1
  • Thierry Aslanian
    • 1
  • Jacques Caton
    • 1
  • Sebastien Lustig
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Albert Trillat CenterLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations