Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Results of primary total hip replacement with first generation Bousquet dual mobility socket with more than twenty five years follow up. About a series of two hundred and twelve hips

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of our study was to evaluate long-term survival and dislocation rate of this concept.

Methods

It was a retrospective study, on 212 hips using a Bousquet dual mobility Novae® tripodal socket (SERF). Mean follow-up was 25.3 years (95 to 372 months). Mean age at the time of the surgery was 53 years.

Results

Pre-operative mean Harris and PMA scores were respectively 54.14 and 11.2. Their respective last follow-up counterparts were 83.6 and 16.9; 25 year follow-up cup survival rate was 90.6%. No dislocation occurred, 45 hips were revised (including 17 cup aseptic loosenings, ten intra prosthetic dislocations, nine liner changes, seven stem failures, two sepsis).

Conclusion

Dual mobility socket global long term survival rate was comparable to similar cemented or uncemented series. The absence of dislocations proved the interest of dual mobility concept in hip stability. Implant improvements might widen DM socket indication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Farizon F, de Lavison R, Azoulai JJ, Bousquet G (1998) Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility. A twelve-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 22:219–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Charnley J, Kamangar A, Longfield MD (1969) The optimum size of prosthetic heads in relation to the wear of plastic sockets in total replacement of the hip. Med Biol Eng 7:31–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A et al (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38:1125–1129. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2313-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Callaghan JJ, Templeton JE, Liu SS et al (2004) Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86–A:690–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF (2002) Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84–A:171–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim Y-H, Park J-W, Park J-S (2014) The 27 to 29-year outcomes of the PCA total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years old. J Arthroplasty 29:2256–2261. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.02.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bojescul JA, Xenos JS, Callaghan JJ, Savory CG et al (2003) Results of porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty without cement at fifteen years: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85–A:1079–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F (2012) Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop 36:511–518. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1289-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Philippot R, Farizon F, Camilleri J-P et al (2008) Survival of cementless dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 94:e23–e27. doi:10.1016/j.rco.2007.10.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121:20–32

  11. Massin P, Schmidt L, Engh CA (1989) Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. An experimental study. J Arthroplast 4:245–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lecuire F, Benareau I, Rubini J, Basso M (2004) Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the Bousquet dual mobility socket. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 90:249–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aldinger PR, Jung AW, Pritsch M et al (2009) Uncemented grit-blasted straight tapered titanium stems in patients younger than fifty-five years of age. Fifteen to twenty-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1432–1439. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoon TR, Rowe S-M, Kim M-S et al (2008) Fifteen- to 20-year results of uncemented tapered fully porous-coated cobalt-chrome stems. Int Orthop 32:317–323. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0337-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grant P, Nordsletten L (2004) Total hip arthroplasty with the Lord prosthesis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86–A:2636–2641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Della Valle CJ, Mesko NW, Quigley L et al (2009) Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1130–1135. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wroblewski BM (1986) 15-21-year results of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 211:30–35

  19. Prudhon J-L, Desmarchelier R, Hamadouche M et al (2015) Causes for revision of dual-mobility and standard primary total hip arthroplasty : Matched case–control study based on a prospective multicenter study of two thousand and forty four implants. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-3064-4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Geringer J, Boyer B, Farizon F (2011) Understanding the dual mobility concept for total hip arthroplasty. Investigations on a multiscale analysis-highlighting the role of arthrofibrosis. Wear 271:2379–2385. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2011.02.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA (2002) A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:649–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Imbert L, Geringer J, Boyer B, Farizon F (2012) Wear analysis of hip explants, dual mobility concept: comparison of quantitative and qualitative analyses. Proc Inst Mech Eng J J Eng Tribol 226:838–853. doi:10.1177/1350650112451211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Archibeck MJ, Surdam JW, Schultz SC et al (2006) Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years or younger. J Arthroplasty 21:476–483. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.08.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Netter JD, Hermida JC, Chen PC et al (2014) Effect of microseparation and third-body particles on dual-mobility crosslinked hip liner wear. J Arthroplasty 29:1849–1853. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop 471:965–970. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2639-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lautridou C, Lebel B, Burdin G, Vielpeau C (2008) Survival of the cementless Bousquet dual mobility cup: minimum 15-year follow-up of 437 total hip arthroplasties. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 94:731–739. doi:10.1016/j.rco.2008.06.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vermersch T, Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy M-H (2015) Prospective longitudinal study of one hundred patients with total hip arthroplasty using a second-generation cementless dual-mobility cup. Int Orthop 39:2097–2101. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2985-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Hospital of Saint Etienne, avenue Albert Raimond, Saint Etienne, France

    Thomas Neri, Remi Philippot, Frederic Farizon & Bertrand Boyer

Authors
  1. Thomas Neri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Remi Philippot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frederic Farizon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bertrand Boyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Neri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neri, T., Philippot, R., Farizon, F. et al. Results of primary total hip replacement with first generation Bousquet dual mobility socket with more than twenty five years follow up. About a series of two hundred and twelve hips. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 557–561 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3373-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3373-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation