Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Segmental acetabular rim defects, bone loss, oversizing, and press fit cup in total hip arthroplasty evaluated with a probabilistic finite element analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Management of segmental rim defects and bone mineral density (BMD) loss in the elderly prior to total hip replacement is unclear within classification systems for acetabular bone loss. In this study, our objectives were (1) to understand how a reduction in BMD in the elderly affects the oversizing of a press-fit cup for primary fixation and (2) to evaluate whether the location of the segmental defect affected cup fixation.

Methods

A finite element (FE) model was used to simulate and evaluate cup insertion and fixation in the context of segmental rim defects. We focused on the distribution of patients over age 70 and used BMD (estimated from CT) as a proxy for aging’s implications on THR and used probabilistic FE analysis to understand how BMD loss affects oversizing of a press-fit cup.

Results

A cup oversized by 1.10 ± 0.28 mm provides sufficient fixation and lower stresses at the cup-bone interface for elderly patients. Defects in the anterior column and posterior column both required the same mean insertion force for cup seating of 84% (taken as an average of 2 anterior column and 2 posterior column defects) compared to the control configuration, which was 5% greater than the insertion force for a superior rim defect and 12% greater than the insertion force for an inferior rim defect.

Conclusions

A defect along the superior or inferior rim had a minimal effect on cup fixation, while a defect in the columns created cup instability and increased stress at the defect location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780–785. doi:10.2106/jbjs.f.00222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W et al (2011) Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93:293–297. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.93b3.25467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Choplin RH, Henley CN, Edds EM et al (2008) Total hip arthroplasty in patients with bone deficiency of the acetabulum. Radiographics 28:771–786. doi:10.1148/rg.283075085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pierannunzii L, Mambretti A, D’Imporzano M (2011) Trabecular metal cup without augments for acetabular revision in case of extensive bone loss and low bone-prosthesis contact. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 24:133–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmolders J, Friedrich MJ, Michel RD et al (2014) Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation. Int Orthop 39:623–630. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2533-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Steno B, Kokavec M, Necas L (2014) Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants. Int Orthop 39:389–395. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2509-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuckler JM (2002) Management strategies for acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 17:153–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huber WO, Noble PC (2014) Effect of design on the initial stability of press-fit cups in the presence of acetabular rim defects: experimental evaluation of the effect of adding circumferential fins. Int Orthop 38:725–731. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2187-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Imporzano M, Liuni FM, Tarantino U (2011) Acetabular fragility fractures in elderly patients. Aging Clin Exp Res 23:71–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez MH, Amirouche F (2014) Cementless acetabular revision with rim acetabular defects: experimental and FEA investigation. University of Illinois at Chicago

  11. Zivkovic I, Gonzalez M, Amirouche F (2010) The effect of under-reaming on the cup/bone interface of a press fit hip replacement. J Biomech Eng 132:41008. doi:10.1115/1.2913228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, O’Rourke M (2005) Managing bone loss in acetabular revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1620–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arden NK, Nevitt MC, Lane NE et al (1999) Osteoarthritis and risk of falls, rates of bone loss, and osteoporotic fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arthritis Rheum 42:1378–1385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Amirouche F, Solitro GF, Broviak S et al (2014) Factors influencing initial cup stability in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 29:1177–1185. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gonzalez MH, Amirouche F, Solitro GF (2015) Cup stability of decreased radius metal on metal acetabular cups: a finite element analysis. In: Orthop. Res. Soc. Annu. Meet. La Vegas, p 957

  16. Amirouche F, Solitro GF (2011) Challenges in modeling total knee arthroplasty and total hip replacement. Procedia IUTAM 2:18–25. doi:10.1016/j.piutam.2011.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keller TS (1994) Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. J Biomech 27:1159–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taddei F, Cristofolini L, Martelli S et al (2006) Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: An in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy. J Biomech 39:2457–2467. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wodzislawski W, Krupa S, Nowicki J et al (2009) The reaction of the pelvis to the implantation of the acetabular component of the hip endoprosthesis—initial tests with the use of computerized tomography. Acta Bioeng Biomech 11:45–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gozzard C, Blom A, Taylor A et al (2003) A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery. J Arthroplast 18:638–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kappe T, Kocak T, Neuerburg C et al (2011) Reliability of radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion. Int Orthop 35:817–821. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1035-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Harnroongroj T (1998) The role of the anterior column of the acetabulum on pelvic stability: a biomechanical study. Injury 29:293–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B, Morscher EW (2002) Load transfer and fixation mode of press-fit acetabular sockets. J Arthroplast 17:926–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nwankwo C, Dong NN, Heffernan CD, Ries MD (2014) Do jumbo cups cause hip center elevation in revision THA? A computer simulation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:572–576. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3169-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jasty M (1998) Jumbo cups and morselized graft. Orthop Clin N Am 29:249–254. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70323-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was partially supported by the Aurelio M. Caccomo Family Foundation

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farid Amirouche.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amirouche, F., Solitro, G.F., Walia, A. et al. Segmental acetabular rim defects, bone loss, oversizing, and press fit cup in total hip arthroplasty evaluated with a probabilistic finite element analysis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1527–1533 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3369-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3369-y

Keywords

Navigation