Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding wear in dual mobility total hip replacement: first generation explant wear patterns

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Dual mobility was introduced by Pr. G. Bousquet to improve the dislocation risk of total hip arthroplasty (THR). The wear mechanisms of this implant remain to be understood. Could enhanced explant wear analysis explain liner wear behaviour?

Methods

Sixty-six explanted liners were selected. Non-destructive 3D scanning and heat colour treatment allowed reporting wear patterns on both convex and concave sides of the liners.

Results

For many liners, liner convexity wear was found to be homogeneous, and linked to a longer implantation time. A few liners had signs of blocking of the convexity, leading to excessive internal damage. Intra prosthetic dislocations were found to only have internal circular wear without liner penetration.

Conclusion

Heat colour treatment showed its effectiveness for highlighting wear patterns. Optimal convexity mobility seemed to be leading to a longer implantation time, with decreased contact stresses on concavity. The retentive rim should have a distinct wear analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F (2012) Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop 36:511–518. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1289-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA (2002) A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:649–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Massin P, Orain V, Philippot R et al (2012) Fixation failures of dual mobility cups: a mid-term study of 2601 hip replacements. Clin Orthop 470:1932–1940. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2213-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lecuire F, Benareau I, Rubini J, Basso M (2004) Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the Bousquet dual mobility socket. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 90:249–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:965–970. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2639-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fabry C, Langlois J, Hamadouche M, Bader R (2016) Intra-prosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility cups after total hip arthroplasty: potential causes from a clinical and biomechanical perspective. Int Orthop 40(5):901–906

  7. Geringer J, Boyer B, Farizon F (2011) Understanding the dual mobility concept for total hip arthroplasty. Investigations on a multiscale analysis-highlighting the role of arthrofibrosis. Wear 271:2379–2385. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2011.02.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Engh CA, Claus AM, Hopper RH, Engh CA (2001) Long-term results using the anatomic medullary locking hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop 137–146

  9. Eingartner C, Heigele T, Volkmann R, Weise K (2006) Long-term results of an uncemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis. Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther 16:23–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I et al (2006) Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 77:57–70. doi:10.1080/17453670610045704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grant P, Nordsletten L (2004) Total hip arthroplasty with the Lord prosthesis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:2636–2641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hallan G, Lie SA, Furnes O et al (2007) Medium- and long-term performance of 11,516 uncemented primary femoral stems from the Norwegian arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1574–1580. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.89B12.18969

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bennett D, Humphreys L, O’Brien S et al (2008) Wear paths produced by individual hip-replacement patients—a large-scale, long-term follow-up study. J Biomech 41:2474–2482. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee K-Y, Kim S-Y, Shin D et al (2004) Wear of retrieved UHMWPE hip liners. Yonsei Med J 45:293–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA (2009) The principle of low frictional torque in the Charnley total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:855–858. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.22027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamaguchi M, Bauer TW, Hashimoto Y (1997) Three-dimensional analysis of multiple wear vectors in retrieved acetabular cups. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1539–1544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Philippot R, Meucci JF, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Modern dual-mobility cup implanted with an uncemented stem: about 100 cases with 12-year follow-up. Surg Technol Int 23:208–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A et al (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess wether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38(6):1125–1129. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2313-2

  19. Prudhon JL, Steffann F, Ferreira A et al (2014) Cementless dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision. Int Orthop 38:2463–2468. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2448-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leclercq S, Benoit JY, de Rosa JP et al (2013) Evora® chromium-cobalt dual mobility socket: results at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR 99:923–928. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2013.07.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Charnley J, Kamangar A, Longfield MD (1969) The optimum size of prosthetic heads in relation to the wear of plastic sockets in total replacement of the hip. Med Biol Eng 7:31–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Matsen Ko LJ, Pollag KE, Yoo JY, Sharkey PF (2016) Serum metal ion levels following total hip arthroplasty with modular dual mobility components. J Arthroplasty 31:186–189. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bertrand Boyer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Bertrand Boyer was a consultant for SERF (Décines, France). Thomas Neri is a consultant for SERF (Décines, France). Rémi Philippot and Frédéric Farizon receive royalties from SERF (Décines, France). Alexandre Di Iorio and Jean Geringer had no conflict of interest concerning this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boyer, B., Neri, T., Geringer, J. et al. Understanding wear in dual mobility total hip replacement: first generation explant wear patterns. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 529–533 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3362-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3362-5

Keywords

Navigation