Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty five years and over ten years of follow-up

A prospective and comparative series

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We report clinical and radiological outcome of a dual mobility cup (DMC) of 2nd generation after a minimum of ten year-follow-up (FU). The goal of this work was to compare the results of this DMC in patients aged less than 55 years and in patients aged more than 55 years.

Methods

From 2000 to 2005, a prospective and consecutive series of 119 THAs with a cementless DMC of 2nd generation (GIROS) were performed in patients aged less than 55 years and 444 in patients aged more than 55 years.

Results

The mean FU was 11 years (8 to 15 years). Survivorships (failure of both components or cup loosening) were not different between patients aged less than 55 years and patients aged more than 55 years. There was no dislocation. DEVANE classification, Harris, PMA and Oxford scores improved after THA but no difference could be found between between < 55 years and > 55 years patients.

Conclusion

These results are better than those of first generation (BOUSQUET) DMC (77 % of survival rate at 20 years of FU). These results are in the same agreement than those of the literature: 99 % of survival rate at 14.2 years of FU for KERBOULL with a low friction arthroplasty and 96.5 % at ten years of FU for ceramic/ceramic bearing (R CHANA).

The DMC for young patient is a relevant surgical option with no dislocation and excellent clinical results and survival rate at more than ten years of FU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caton J, Merabet Z (2004) Hip dislocation and outcome. In: France M (ed) In La prothèse totale de hanche. Lyon, pp 223–7

  2. Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS (2004) The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:9–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. AJJR (2014) American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR). Annual report. AAOS-AAHKS

  4. Bousquet G, Argenson C, Godeneche JL, Cisterne JP, Gazielly DF, Girardin P, Debiesse JL (1986) Recovery after aseptic loosening of cemented total hip arthroplasties with Bousquet’s cementless prosthesis. Apropos of 136 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 72(Suppl 2):70–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bousquet G, Gaziely DF, Debiesse JL, Girardin P, Relave M, Israeli A (1985) The ceramic coated cementless total hip arthroplasty: basic concepts anfd surgical technique. J Orthop Surg Tech 1:15–28

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aubriot JH, Lesimple P, Leclercq S (1993) Study of Bousquet’s non-cemented acetabular implant in 100 hybrid total hip prostheses (Charnley type cemented femoral component). Average 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg 59(Suppl 1):267–271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Verdier R (2013) Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up. Int Orthop 37:2345–2350

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Leclercq S, Benoit JY, de Rosa JP, Tallier E, Leteurtre C, Girardin PH (2013) Evora chromium-cobalt dual mobility socket: Results at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:758–764

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vielpeau C, Lebel B, Ardouin L, Burdin G, Lautridou C (2011) The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases. Int Orthop 35:225–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Aslanian T, Verdier R (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38:1125–1129

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Philippot R, Meucci JF, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Modern dual-mobility cup implanted with an uncemented stem: about 100 cases with 12-year follow-up. Surg Technol Int 23:208–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F (2012) Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop 36:511–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lautridou C, Lebel B, Burdin G, Vielpau C (2008) Survie à 16,5 ans de recul moyen de la cupule, double mobilité, non scellée de Bousquet dans l’arthroplastie totale de hanche. Série historique de 437 hanches. Rep. 94

  14. Farizon F, de Lavison R, Azoulai JJ, Bousquet G (1998) Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility. A twelve-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 22:219–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kerboull L, Hamadouche M, Courpied JP, Kerboull M (2004) Long-term results of Charnley-Kerboull hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wroblewski BM, Fleming PA, Hall RM, Siney PD (1998) Stem fixation in the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients using an intramedullary bone block. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 80:273–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Almeida F, Pino L, Silvestre A, Gomar F (2010) Mid- to long-term outcome of cementless total hip arthroplasty in younger patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 18:172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Makela KT, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P, Remes V (2008) Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2160–2170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bizot P, Hannouche D, Nizard R, Witvoet J, Sedel L (2004) Hybrid alumina total hip arthroplasty using a press-fit metal-backed socket in patients younger than 55 years. A six- to 11-year evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86:190–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Boyer P, Huten D, Loriaut P, Lestrat V, Jeanrot C, Massin P (2010) Is alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings total hip replacement the right choice in patients younger than 50 years of age? A 7- to 15-year follow-up study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:616–622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chana R, Facek M, Tilley S, Walter WK, Zicat B, Walter WL (2013) Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in young patients: Outcomes and activity levels at minimum ten-year follow-up. Bone Joint J 95-B:1603–1609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Delaunay CP, Putman S, Puliero B, Begin M, Migaud H, Bonnomet F (2016) Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With Metasul Bearings Provides Good Results in Active Young Patients: A Concise Followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi:10.1007/s11999-016-4920-2

    Google Scholar 

  23. Epinette JA, Beracassat R, Tracol P, Pagazani G, Vandenbussche E (2014) Are modern dual mobility cups a valuable option in reducing instability after primary hip arthroplasty, even in younger patients? J Arthroplasty 29:1323–1328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Régis Verdier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Ethical approval

For this type of study formal consent is not required

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puch, JM., Derhi, G., Descamps, L. et al. Dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty five years and over ten years of follow-up. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 475–480 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3325-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3325-x

Keywords

Navigation