Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ultrasound-guided intra-articular tenotomy of the long head of the biceps: a cadaveric feasibility study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Isolated tenotomy of the long head of the biceps (LHB) is known to improve function in patients with massive and non-reparable cuff tears without osteoarthritis.

This two step cadaveric study was performed with the purpose to identify the best surgical technique for isolated LHB tenotomy under USG guidance (pilot study) and evaluate its feasibility (subsequent study).

Methods

Pre-operative ultrasonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff was performed and any specimens whose long head of the biceps was not found to be intact during the pre-operative ultrasound evaluation were excluded. In the pilot study, nine scar-free cadaveric shoulders underwent ultrasound-guided tenotomy through a single percutaneous portal to determine the best instrument and approach which ensure elective and complete LHB tenotomy. Using it, a second series of 12 cadaveric shoulders were operated following a similar protocol to evaluate the feasibility of this technique.

Result

Pilot study: The use of a backward endoscopic cutter through a posterior percutaneous portal was found to be the safest. Control of the tenotomy was possible by manipulating the intra-articular part of the tendon with the instrument (“Groove Alone” test). Subsequent study: The tenotomy of the LHB was complete in all cases. Mean length of the proximal LHB stump was 0.3 cm (range, 0–0.8 cm). No iatrogenic lesion was observed when using the backward endoscopic cutter. On the other hand, the use of straight endoscopic scissors led to severe damage to the rotator cuff and the conjoined tendon. The “Groove Alone” test checked against iatrogenic injury. This was not done in one of the cases and it led to a partial section of the superior half of the tendon of the subscapularis.

Conclusion

By the use of both appropriate endoscopic instrumentation and the newly described “Groove Alone” test, ultrasound-guided LHB tenotomy through a single percutaneous portal appears to be a feasible and reliable procedure that could be an alternative to isolated arthroscopic tenotomy. The choice of a posterior portal (soft point) may increase the safety and precision of this procedure and decrease the length of the proximal stump of the LHB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boileau P, Baqué F, Valerio L, Ahrens P, Chuinard C, Trojani C (2007) Isolated arthroscopic biceps tenotomy or tenodesis improves symptoms in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):747–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hsu AR, Ghodadra NS, Provencher MT, Lewis PB, Bach BR (2011) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20(2):326–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lim TK, Moon ES, Koh KH, Yoo JC (2011) Patient-related factors and complications after arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon. Am J Sports Med 39(4):783–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maynou CMN, Cassagnaud X, Audebert S, Mestdagh H (2005) Clinical results of arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps brachii in full thickness tears of the rotator cuff without repair: 40 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 91(4):300–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shank JR, Singleton SB, Braun S, Kissenberth MJ, Ramappa A, Ellis H et al (2011) A comparison of forearm supination and elbow flexion strength in patients with long head of the biceps tenotomy or tenodesis. Arthroscopy 27(1):9–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Szabó I, Boileau P, Walch G (2008) The proximal biceps as a pain generator and results of tenotomy. Sports Med Arthrosc 16(3):180–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, Nové-Josserand L, Neyton L, Szabo I (2005) Arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: clinical and radiographic results of 307 cases. J Shoulder Elb Surg 14(3):238–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lévy B, Ducat A, Gaudin P, Maqdés A, Brasseur JL, Klouche S et al (2012) Ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon: a non-reliable technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(6):1027–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aly AR, Rajasekaran S, Mohamed A, Beavis C, Obaid H (2014) Feasibility of ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon—A pilot cadaveric study. J Clin Ultrasound 43(6):361–366

  10. Greditzer HG, Kaplan LD, Lesniak BP, Jose J (2014) Ultrasound-guided percutaneous long head of the biceps tenotomy: a novel technique with case report. HSS J : Musculoskelet J Hosp Spec Surg 10(3):240–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brasseur JL (2012) The biceps tendons: from the top and from the bottom. J Ultrasound 15(1):29–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farin PU (1996) Sonography of the biceps tendon of the shoulder: normal and pathologic findings. J Clin Ultrasound 24(6):309–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Middleton WD, Reinus WR, Totty WG, Melson CL, Murphy WA (1986) Ultrasonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff and biceps tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68(3):440–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, Patel M, Wright RW, Yamaguchi K (2000) Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82(4):498–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Checcucci G, Allegra A, Bigazzi P, Gianesello L, Ceruso M, Gritti G (2008) A new technique for regional anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery based on a suprascapular nerve block and an axillary nerve block: an evaluation of the first results. Arthroscopy 24(6):689–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nam Y-S, Jeong J-J, Han S-H, Park S-E, Lee S-M, Kwon M-J et al (2011) An anatomic and clinical study of the suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks for shoulder arthroscopy. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20(7):1061–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors warmly thank Mr Luc d’Asnières de Veigy (Monte-Carlo Joint Repair, Monaco) and the Ecole de Chirurgie du Fer à Moulin (APHP, Paris).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Department, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center - Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Frank Atlan

  2. Orthopaedic Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

    Jean David Werthel

Authors
  1. Frank Atlan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean David Werthel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Atlan.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atlan, F., Werthel, J.D. Ultrasound-guided intra-articular tenotomy of the long head of the biceps: a cadaveric feasibility study. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 2567–2573 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3231-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3231-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation