Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty conversion of hip fusion

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Hip fusion conversion has shown mixed results, in particular a higher rate of failure than primary total hip replacement. Conversion is usually carried out by a lateral approach.

Methods

We reported a series of 37 hip fusion conversions performed by an anterior approach. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of this unusual approach were reported at eight years of follow up.

Results

At eight years of follow up, survivorship was 86. 6 % (IC 95 %: 62.4–95.7 %). Sixteen patients reported good relief of the pre-operative back spine or knee pain. PMA score was significantly improved. Two implant aseptic loosenings needing revision surgery were reported.

Conclusion

The anterior approach seemed to be as good as the other hip approaches for hip fusion conversion to total hip replacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schafroth MU, Blokzijl RJ, Haverkamp D, Maas M, Marti RK (2009) The long-term fate of the hip arthrodesis: does it remain a valid procedure for selected cases in the 21st century? Int Orthop 34:805–810

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaulé PE, Matta JM, Mast JW (2002) Hip arthrodesis: current indications and techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10:249–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sponseller PD, McBeath AA, Perpich M (1984) Hip arthrodesis in young patients. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 66:853–859

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Callaghan JJ, Brand RA, Pedersen DR (1985) Hip arthrodesis. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1328–1335

  5. Hardinge K, Williams D, Etienne A (1977) Conversion of fused hips to low friction arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 59-B:385-92

  6. Jain S, Giannoudis PV (2013) Arthrodesis of the hip and conversion to total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28:1596–1602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Peterson ED, Nemanich JP, Altenburg A, Cabanela ME (2009) Hip arthroplasty after previous arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2880–2885

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Reikerås O, Bjerkreim I, Gundersson R (1995) Total hip arthroplasty for arthrodesed hips. 5- to 13-year results. J Arthroplasty 10:529–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kilgus DJ, Amstutz HC, Wolgin MA, Dorey FJ (1990) Joint replacement for ankylosed hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 72:45–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morsi E (2007) Total hip arthroplasty for fused hips; planning and techniques. J Arthroplast 22:871–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lustig S, Vaz G, Guyen O, Tayot O, Chavane H, Bejui-Hugues J, Carret J-P (2007) Total hip arthroplasty after hip arthrodesis performed for septic arthritis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 93:828–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Neill DA, Harris WH (1984) Failed total hip replacement: assessment by plain radiographs, arthrograms, and aspiration of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 66:540–546

    Google Scholar 

  14. Engh CAC, Massin PP, Suthers KEK (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257:107–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barton C, Kim PR (2009) Complications of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin NA 40:371–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 55:1629–1632

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. d’Aubigné RM (1970) Numerical evaluation of hip function. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 56:481-6

  18. Ditunno, Young W, Donovan W, Creasey G (1994) The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 32:70-80

  19. Kaplan E, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Joshi AB, Markovic L, Hardinge K, Murphy JCM (2002) Conversion of a fused hip to total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 84-A:1335–1341

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hamadouche M, Kerboull L, Meunier A, Courpied JP, Kerboull M (2001) Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of ankylosed hips: a five to twenty-one-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 83-A:992–998

  22. Fernandez-Fairen M, Murcia-Mazón A, Torres A, Querales V, Murcia A (2010) Is total hip arthroplasty after hip arthrodesis as good as primary arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1971–1983

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Schäfer D, Dick W, Morscher E (2000) Total hip arthroplasty after arthrodesis of the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:176–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aderinto J, Lulu OB, Backstein DJ, Safir O, Gross AE (2012) Functional results and complications following conversion of hip fusion to total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol 94:36–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Scemama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scemama, C., Lestrat, V., Combourieu, B. et al. Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty conversion of hip fusion. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 1821–1825 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3084-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3084-0

Keywords

Navigation