Skip to main content
Log in

Comments on “Adductor canal block provides better performance after total knee arthroplasty compared with femoral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Li D, Yang Z, Xie X, Zhao J, Kang P (2015) Adductor canal block provides better performance after total knee arthroplasty compared with femoral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2998-x

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kwofie MK, Shastri UD, Gadsden JC, Sinha SK, Abrams JH, Xu D, Salviz EA (2013) The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk: a blinded, randomized trial of volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med 38(4):321–325. doi:10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295df80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaeger P, Nielsen ZJ, Henningsen MH, Hilsted KL, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB (2013) Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 118(2):409–415. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e318279fa0b

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang W, Hu Y, Tao Y, Liu X, Wang G (2014) Ultrasound-guided continuous adductor canal block for analgesia after total knee replacement. Chin Med J 127(23):4077–4081

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Higgins JP, Green S (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, vol 5. Wiley Online Library

  6. Jaeger P, Zaric D, Fomsgaard JS, Hilsted KL, Bjerregaard J, Gyrn J, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB (2013) Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 38(6):526–532. doi:10.1097/aap.0000000000000015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Memtsoudis SG, Yoo D, Stundner O, Danninger T, Ma Y, Poultsides L, Kim D, Chisholm M, Jules-Elysee K, Valle AG, Sculco TP (2015) Subsartorial adductor canal vs femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee replacement. Int Orthop 39(4):673–680. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2527-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim MH, Nahm FS, Kim TK, Chang MJ, Do SH (2014) Comparison of postoperative pain in the first and second knee in staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty: clinical evidence of enhanced pain sensitivity after surgical injury. Pain 155(1):22–27. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2013.08.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Memtsoudis SG, Hargett M, Russell LA, Parvizi J, Cats-Baril WL, Stundner O, Sculco TP (2013) Consensus statement from the consensus conference on bilateral total knee arthroplasty group. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(8):2649–2657. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-2976-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Memtsoudis SG, Ma Y, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Mazumdar M, Gaber-Baylis LK, MacKenzie CR, Sculco TP (2009) Perioperative outcomes after unilateral and bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Anesthesiology 111(6):1206–1216. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181bfab7d

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Urban MK, Chisholm M, Wukovits B (2006) Are postoperative complications more common with single-stage bilateral (SBTKR) than with unilateral knee arthroplasty: guidelines for patients scheduled for SBTKR. HSS J 2(1):78–82. doi:10.1007/s11420-005-0125-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeni JA Jr, Snyder-Mackler L (2010) Clinical outcomes after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: comparison to unilateral total knee arthroplasty and healthy controls. J Arthroplast 25(4):541–546. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grevstad U, Mathiesen O, Valentiner LS, Jaeger P, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB (2015) Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, blinded study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 40(1):3–10. doi:10.1097/aap.0000000000000169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shah NA, Jain NP (2014) Is continuous adductor canal block better than continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty? Effect on ambulation ability, early functional recovery and pain control: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplast 29(11):2224–2229. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Tian.

Additional information

Zhongyu Han, Chaorui Wu, Yingshan Liu, Liuxian Ban, Meige Liu and Jing Tian contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, Z., Wu, C., Liu, Y. et al. Comments on “Adductor canal block provides better performance after total knee arthroplasty compared with femoral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 1059–1060 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3078-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3078-y

Keywords

Navigation