Skip to main content
Log in

No difference in patellar kinematics between fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The influence of cruciate-ligament-retaining (CR-TKA) and cruciate-ligament-substituting (CS-TKA) TKA on tibiofemoral kinematics was analysed in many investigations. However, the influence on patellar kinematics is unclear so far. The aim of this study was to compare patellar kinematics of the natural knee with those after CR- and CS-TKA.

Methods

Patellar kinematics of nine healthy whole-body cadaveric knees before and after CR- and CS-TKA was investigated using a commercial optical computer navigation system. Patellar kinematics of the healthy knee was compared with those after CR- and CS-TKA.

Results

No significant difference between the natural knee and the knee after TKA or between both types of TKA for patellar kinematics could be found. Interestingly, both types of TKA resulted in a more medial patellar shift and a contrary patellar tilt and rotation behaviour. CR- and CS-TKA resulted in smaller values for patellar epicondylar distance at all flexion angles.

Conclusions

Our study found no influence of prosthesis type on patellar kinematics. Factors like component alignment and prosthesis design seem to be more important in terms of adequate restoration of patellar kinematics in TKA than whether choosing CR- or CS-TKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ et al (2001) Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392:46–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Belvedere C, Catani F, Ensini A et al (2007) Patellar tracking during total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro feasibility study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:985–993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hefzy MS, Jackson WT, Saddemi SR, Hsieh Y-F (1992) Effects of tibial rotations on patellar tracking and patello-femoral contact areas. J Biomed Eng 14:329–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kessler O, Patil S, Colwell CW Jr, D’Lima DD (2008) The effect of femoral component malrotation on patellar biomechanics. J Biomech 41:3332–3339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicoll D, Rowley DI (2010) Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 92-B:1238–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schiavone Panni A, Cerciello S, Del Regno C et al (2014) Patellar resurfacing complications in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38:313–317

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Petersen W, Rembitzki I, Brüggemann G-P et al (2014) Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review. Int Orthop 38:319–328

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chinzei N, Ishida K, Matsumoto T et al (2014) Evaluation of patellofemoral joint in advance® medial-pivot total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38:509–515

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Howell S, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik K et al (2015) Does varus alignment adversely affect implant survival and function six years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop

  10. Smith AJ, Lloyd DG, Wood DJ (2004) Pre-surgery knee joint loading patterns during walking predict the presence and severity of anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 22:260–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bracey D, Brown M, Beard H et al (2015) Effects of patellofemoral overstuffing on knee flexion and patellar kinematics following total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Int Orthop

  12. Hirsch HS, Lotke PA, Morrison LD (1994) The Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Total Knee Surgery: Save, Sacrifice, or Substitute? Clin Orthop 309. Symposium

  13. Victor J, Banks S, Bellemans J (2005) Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and -substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87-B:646–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Keblish PA (2001) Kinematics of the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:706–714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takeuchi T, Lathi VK, Khan AM, Hayes WC (1995) Patellofemoral contact pressures exceed the compressive yield strength of UHMWPE in total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 10:363–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li G, DeFrate LE, Zayontz S et al (2004) The effect of tibiofemoral joint kinematics on patellofemoral contact pressures under simulated muscle loads. J Orthop Res 22:801–806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Waslewski GL, Marson BM, Benjamin JB (1998) Early, incapacitating instability of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:763–767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Masri BA, McCormack RG (1995) The Effect of Knee Flexion and Quadriceps Contraction on the Axial View of the Patella. Clin J. Sport Med 5(1)

Download references

Acknowledgments

We to thank DePuy, Germany and Brainlab, Germany for technical and logistical support for this study. Furthermore, we thank the Institute of Anatomy at the Medical University of Graz/Austria, for providing the specimen for this investigation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armin Keshmiri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Additional information

This work was performed at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at the Medical University of Regensbur/Germany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keshmiri, A., Maderbacher, G., Benditz, A. et al. No difference in patellar kinematics between fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 731–735 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3041-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3041-y

Keywords

Navigation