Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Short-term results of percutaneous treatment of acetabular fractures: functional outcomes, radiographic assessment and complications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Our purpose was to assess functional outcomes, radiographic characteristics and complications in patients who underwent fixation of acetabular fracture using percutaneous means only.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with an acetabular fracture admitted to a level 1 trauma centre and treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. Nineteen patients were identified, and mechanism of injury, radiologic classification of fracture, complications and functional outcomes were analysed. Outcome measurements included Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, which are validated patient questionnaires assessing functional outcome. They are scored as a point range on a per-question basis, with a combined range possibility of 0–96 for WOMAC and 5–75 for PROMIS.

Results

Nineteen patients over a two year period were reviewed. Fracture displacement improved following surgery from a mean 7.3 mm (range 0–33 mm) to 2.6 mm (range 0–12 mm). Complications included one post-operative death from non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, sciatic nerve injury, malpositioned screw and deep infection. There were no vascular injuries, pulmonary emboli or deep venous thromboses. Of the 19 patients eligible for the study, seven completed both PROMIS mobility and WOMAC osteoarthritis questionnaires at a mean follow-up of 572 days (1.57 years), with a range of 435–862 days. The average WOMAC score was 7.4 (range 0–30) and mean PROMIS score 66.4 (range 50–75).

Conclusions

Functional outcomes in this study are comparable with other published studies and support percutaneous management of acetabular fractures as an effective alternative to open reduction and internal fixation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Judet R, Judet J, Lanzetta A, Letournel E (1968) Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and guiding rules for open reduction. Arch Orthop 81(3):119–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stover M, Weresh MJ, Bosse MJ et al (2000) Nonoperative treatment of fractures of the acetabulum. Abstr: Orthop Trauma Assoc 14:148–149

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tile M, Olson SA (2003) Decision making: Nonoperative and operative indications for acetabular fractures. In: Tile M, Helfet DL, Kellam JF (eds) Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 496–532

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gay SB, Sistrom C, Wang GJ et al (1992) Percutaneous screw fixation of acetabular fractures with CT guidance: preliminary results of a new technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158(4):819–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim JW et al (2015) Acetabular fractures in elderly patients: a comparative study of low-energy versus high-energy injuries. Int Orthop 39:1175–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozzio AE, Wydra FB, Mitchell JJ, Ackerson RM, Mauffrey CM (2014) Percutaneous fixation of anterior and posterior column acetabular fractures. Orthopedics 37(10):675–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dienstknecht T et al (2013) Screw placement in percutaneous acetabular surgery: gender differences of anatomical landmarks in a cadaveric study. Int Orthop 37(4):673–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bellamy N (1982) Osteoarthritis — an evaluative index for clinical trials. MSc thesis, McMaster University

  9. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A et al (2010) The Patient Reported Outcome Measurment Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol 63:1179–1194

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Fica G et al (1998) Open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures. Int Orthop 22(6):348–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gary JL, VanHal M, Gibbons SD et al (2012) Functional outcomes in elderly patients with acetabular fractures treated with minimally invasive reduction and percutaneous fixation. J Orthop Trauma 26(5):278–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Starr AJ, Jones AL, Reinert CM et al (2001) Preliminary results and complications following limited open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. Injury 32(suppl 1):45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kazemi N, Archdeacon MT (2012) Immediate full weightbearing after percutaneous fixation of anterior column acetabulum fractures. J Orthop Trauma 26(2):73–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oberst M, Hauschild O, Konstantinidis L, Suedkamp NP, Schmal H (2012) Effects of three-dimensional navigation on intraoperative management and early postoperative outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of displaced acetabular fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73(4):950–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cyril Mauffrey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bozzio, A.E., Johnson, C.R. & Mauffrey, C. Short-term results of percutaneous treatment of acetabular fractures: functional outcomes, radiographic assessment and complications. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 1703–1708 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2987-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2987-0

Keywords

Navigation