Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The use of megaprosthesis in the treatment of periprosthetic knee fractures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The optimum treatment for periprosthetic fractures in the region of the distal femur is undefined. Although internal fixation for prostheses which are stable is commonly utilised, this can lead to very prolonged morbidity and failure of the fracture to unite. Where the prosthesis is either loose or infected, revision surgery is required and a ‘tumour type’ prosthesis can be successfully utilised.

Methods

The outcome of 27 patients treated by an endoprosthetic replacement for periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur between 1988 and 2013 are reported. Two cases were treated by two-stage revision due to persistent infection. Clinical outcomes were assessed by Knee Society score and Knee Society pain scores.

Results

All 27 patients mobilised rapidly in the post-operative period and infection where present was eradicated by the technique. There have been no cases of further revision in the patients where clinical follow-up is available. Knee Society scores following treatment averaged 88 and pain scores 43 at six months post-operatively. Eight patients have died during the long study period reflecting the age of the study population.

Conclusions

The use of a tumour-type endoprosthesis in situations of comminuted periprosthetic fractures associated with a loose prosthesis shows favourable results with low complication rates and rapid mobilisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Figgie MP, Goldberg VM, Figgie HE 3rd, Sobel M (1990) The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 5(3):267–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aaron RK, Scott R (1987) Supracondylar fracture of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 219:136–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Culp RW, Schmidt RG, Hanks G, Mak A, Esterhai JL Jr, Heppenstall RB (1987) Supracondylar fracture of the femur following prosthetic knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 222:212–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanks GA, Mathews HH, Rouston GW, Loughran TP (1989) Supracondylar fracture of the femur following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 4:289–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rand JA (1994) Supracondylar fracture of the femur associated with polyethylene wear after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:1389–1393

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hohl M (1984) Fractures about the knee. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP (eds) Fractures in adults, vol 2, 2nd ed. JP Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 1429–1444

  7. Sisto DJ, Lachiewicz PF, Insall JN (1985) Treatment of supracondylar fractures following prosthetic arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop 196:265–272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirsh DM, Bhalla S, Roffman M (1981) Supracondylar fracture of the femur following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:162–163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schatzker J, Lambert DC (1979) Supracondylar fractures of the femur. Clin Orthop 138:77–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cain PR, Rubash HE, Wissinger HA, McClain EJ (1986) Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 208:205–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Booth RE Jr (1994) Revision total knee arthroplasty. Management of periprosthetic fractures. Orthopaedics 17:845–847

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ehlinger M, Bahlau D, Rahme M, Adam P, Bonnomet F (2015) Has a patient type with peri-prosthetic femoral fractures evolved? Int Orthop. Jul 9 [Epub ahead of print]

  13. Scott RD (1988) Anterior femoral notching and ipsilateral supracondylar femur fracture in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3(4):381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lesh ML, Schneider DJ, Pellegrini VD (1998–1999) Biomechanical evaluation of the effects of anterior cortical notching of the femur in total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Trans 22:122

  15. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM (1988) Anterior femoral notching and ipsilateral supracondylar femur fracture in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3:185–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW (1999) Periprosthetic fractures of the femur complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 30:265–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim KI, Egol KA, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J (2006) Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:167–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Felix NA, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD (1997) Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:113–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alden KJ, Duncan WH, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Haidukewych GJ (1996) Intraoperative fracture during primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010(468):90–95

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ritter MA, Carr K, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB (1996) Tibial shaft fracture following tibial tubercle osteotomy. J Arthroplasty 11:117–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Madsen F, Kjaersguard-Anderson P, Juhl M, Sneppen O (1989) A custom-made prosthesis for the treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Trauma 3:332–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Panegrossi G, Ceretti M, Papalia M, Casella F, Favetti F, Falez F (2014) Bone loss management in total knee revision surgery. Int Orthop 2:419–427. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2262-1, Review

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Freedman EL, Hak DJ, Johnson EE, Eckhart JJ (1995) Total knee replacement including modular distal femoral components in elderly patients with acute fracture or non-union. J Orthop Trauma 9:231–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Makinen TJ, Dhotar HS, Fichman SG, Gunton MJ, Woodside M, Safir O, Backstein D, Willett TL, Kuzyk PR (2015) Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical comparison of four methods of fixation. Int Orthop. Apr 16 [Epub ahead of print]

  25. Saidi K, Ben-Lulu O, Tsuji M et al (2014) Supracondylar periprosthetic fracture of the knee in elderly patients. A comparison of treatment using allograft–implant composites, standard revision components and a distal femoral prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 29(1):110–114

  26. Hanssen AD, Stuart MJ (2000) Treatment of periprosthetic tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:91–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chao EY (1989) A composite fixation principle for modular segmental defect replacement (SDR) prostheses. Orthop Clin North Am 20:439–453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cannon S, Briggs WR, Cobb JP, Walker PS, Unwin B, Blunn B (1988) Enhanced fixation of bone tumour endoprostheses using hydroxyapatite coating. Proceedings of the American and European Musculoskeletal Tumour Society, p 113

  29. Coathup MJ, Blackburn J, Goodship AE, Cunningham JL, Smith T, Blunn GW (2005) Role of hydroxyapatite coating in resisting wear particle migration and osteolysis around acetabular components. Biomaterials 26(19):4161–4169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest and has received no payment in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK

    Stephen Robert Cannon

  2. St Giles Lodge, Amersham Road, Chalfont St Giles, Bucks, HP8 4RZ, UK

    Stephen Robert Cannon

Authors
  1. Stephen Robert Cannon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Robert Cannon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cannon, S.R. The use of megaprosthesis in the treatment of periprosthetic knee fractures. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 1945–1950 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2969-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2969-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation