Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with Anthony-K plate: prospective minimum five year follow-up data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complication rates, after a minimum of five years of follow-up after medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) using an Anthony-K plate.

Methods

MOWHTO was performed on 35 knees of 34 consecutive patients. A visual analogue scale (VAS), and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) and Lysholm scores, were used in clinical evaluation. Upon radiographic assessment, alignment was expressed as the femorotibial angle (FTA). The posterior tibial slope (PTS) and the Insall-Salvati Index (ISI) were also measured.

Results

VAS, WOMAC, and Lysholm scores improved significantly upon follow-up (p < 0.001 for all). The overall mean FTA was 4.68 ± 4.39° varus pre-operatively; at the last post-operative follow-up, the value was 8.43 ± 2.02° valgus. The mean correction angle was 13.1 ± 2.7°. A significant increase in PTS was evident (p < 0.01), as was a significant decrease in the ISI (p < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 8.6 %.

Conclusions

The Anthony-K plate affords accurate correction, initially stabilises the osteotomy after surgery, and maintains such stability until the osteotomy gap is completely healed, without correction loss. The plate survival rate was 97.2 % after a minimum of five years of follow-up. The plate increased the PTS, as do other medial osteotomy fixation plates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asik M, Sen C, Kilic B, Goksan SB, Ciftci F, Taser OF (2006) High tibial osteotomy with Puddu plate for the treatment of varus gonarthrosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(10):948–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elmalı N, Esenkaya I, Can M, Karakaplan M (2013) Monoplanar versus biplanar medial open-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis: a comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(12):2689–2695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saragaglia D, Massfelder J, Refaie R, Rubens-Duval B, Mader R, Rouchy RC, Pailhé R (2015) Computer-assisted total knee replacement after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: medium-term results in a series of ninety cases. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2791-x

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saragaglia D, Rouchy RC, Krayan A, Refaie R (2014) Return to sports after valgus osteotomy of the knee joint in patients with medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis. Int Orthop 38(10):2109–2114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bode G, von Heyden J, Pestka J, Schmal H, Salzmann G, Südkamp N, Niemeyer P (2013) Prospective 5-year survival rate data following open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1949-1955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim SJ, Koh YG, Chun YM, Kim YC, Park YS, Sung CH (2009) Medial opening wedge high-tibial osteotomy using a kinematic navigation system versus a conventional method: a 1-year retrospective, comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(2):128–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pornrattanamaneewong C, Narkbunnam R, Chareancholvanich K (2012) Medial proximal tibial angle after medial opening wedge HTO: a retrospective diagnostic test study. Indian J Orthop 46(5):525–530

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lustig S, Scholes CJ, Costa AJ, Coolican MJ, Parker DA (2013) Different changes in slope between the medial and lateral tibial plateau after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):32–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ribeiro CH, Severino NR, de Barros M, Fucs PM (2014) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: navigation system compared to the conventional technique in a controlled clinical study. Int Orthop 38(8):1627–1631

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee YS, Lee SB, Oh WS, Kwon YE, Lee BK (2014) Changes in patellofemoral alignment do not cause clinical impact after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3349-y

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martinez de Albornoz P, Leyes M, Forriol F, Del Buono A, Maffulli N (2014) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: plate position and biomechanics of the medial tibial plateau. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(11):2641–2647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sischek EL, Birmingham TB, Leitch KM, Martin R, Willits K, Giffin JR (2014) Staged medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for bilateral varus gonarthrosis: biomechanical and clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(11):2672–2681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho SW, Kim DH, Lee GC, Lee SH, Park SH (2013) Comparison between autogenous bone graft and allogenous cancellous bone graft in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Relat Res 25(3):117–125

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cotic M, Vogt S, Hinterwimmer S, Feucht MJ, Slotta-Huspenina J, Schuster T, Imhoff AB (2015) A matched-pair comparison of two different locking plates for valgus-producing medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: peek-carbon composite plate versus titanium plate. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2032-2040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hernigou P, Queinnec S, Picard L et al (2013) Safety of a novel high tibial osteotomy locked plate fixation for immediate full weight-bearing: a case–control study. Int Orthop 37(12):2377–2384

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim MK, Ha JK, Lee DW, Nam SW, Kim JG, Lee YS (2014) No correction angle loss with stable plates in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1999-2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hernigou P, Flouzat Lachaniette C, Delambre J, Guissou I, Dahmani O, Ibrahim Ouali M, Poignard A (2015) Full weight bearing and dynamisation with Limmed® locked plate fixation accelerates bone regeneration in the volume of opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 39(7):1295–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ribeiro CH, Severino NR, Cury Rde P, de Oliveira VM, Avakian R, Ayhara T, de Camargo OP (2009) A new fixation material for open-wedge tibial osteotomy for genu varum. Knee 16(5):366–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ertürk C, Altay MA, Sert C, Levent A, Yaptı M, Yüce K (2015) The body composition of patients with knee osteoarthritis: relationship with clinical parameters and radiographic severity. Aging Clin Exp Res. doi:10.1007/s40520-015-0325-4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ganji R, Omidvar M, Izadfar A, Alavinia SM (2013) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy using tibial wedge allograft: a case series study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23(1):111–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saito T, Kumagai K, Akamatsu Y, Kobayashi H, Kusayama Y (2014) Five- to ten-year outcome following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with rigid plate fixation in combination with an artificial bone substitute. Bone Joint J 96-B(3):339–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hernigou P, Roussignol X, Flouzat-Lachaniette CH, Filippini P, Guissou I, Poignard A (2010) Opening wedge tibial osteotomy for large varus deformity with Ceraver resorbable beta tricalcium phosphate wedges. Int Orthop 34(2):191–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brazier J, Migaud H, Gougeon F, Cotten A, Fontaine C, Duquennoy A (1996) Evaluation of methods for radiographic measurement of the tibial slope. A study of 83 healthy knees. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 82(3):195–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Han SB, Bae JH, Lee SJ, Jung TG, Kim KH, Kwon JH, Nha KW (2014) Biomechanical properties of a new anatomical locking metal block plate for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: uniplane osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res 26(3):155–161

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Marti CB, Gautier E, Wachtl SW, Jakob RP (2004) Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 20(4):366–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hudek R, Fuchs B, Regenfelder F, Koch PP (2011) Is noncontact ACL injury associated with the posterior tibial and meniscal slope? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(8):2377–2384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Asada S, Akagi M, Mori S, Matsushita T, Hashimoto K, Hamanishi C (2012) Increase in posterior tibial slope would result in correction loss in frontal plane after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(3):571–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. DeMeo PJ, Johnson EM, Chiang PP, Flamm AM, Miller MC (2010) Midterm follow-up of opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Am J Sports Med 38(10):2077–2084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors state that they had no funding or any conflicts of interest, which may have produced a bias in the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Akif Altay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altay, M.A., Ertürk, C., Altay, N. et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with Anthony-K plate: prospective minimum five year follow-up data. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 1447–1454 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2919-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2919-z

Keywords

Navigation