Abstract
Purpose
In younger adults with fractures of the femoral neck, anatomic reduction is compulsory and maintaining the reduction is crucial. Both cannulated screws and dynamic hip screw (DHS) have the capacity of compression in the fracture site but the strength for keeping reduction is not the same. The aim of this study was to compare the results with fixations of the femoral neck fractures with cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw.
Methods
This is a randomized clinical trial study on 58 cases with a minimum of one year follow-up. Leg length discrepancy, Harris Hip Score, infection, avascular necrosis of femoral head, and union of the fracture site were evaluated.
Results
There were two failures in the first trimester in the cannulated screw group and three more failures in the second and third trimesters in this group. In the DHS group, there was no reduction and fixation failure in the follow-up period. There was no fixation failure (0 %) in Group B (DHS) but there were five fixation failures (18 %) in Group A (screw), and there is significant difference between the groups (p < 0.001). The rate of avascular necrosis was the same in both groups.
Conclusions
It seems to us that in our practice the fixation of femoral neck fracture in young adults with the DHS is a better option compared with the osteosynthsis with multiple cannulated screws.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumgaertner MR, Higgins TF (2001) Femoral neck fractures. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD (eds) Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in adults. Lippincott Williams & Williams, Philadelphia
Ly TV, Swiontkowski MF (2008) Treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(10):2254–2266
Szita J, Cserháti P, Bosch U, Manninger J, Bodzay T, Fekete K (2002) Intracapsular femoral neck fractures: the importance of early reduction and stable osteosynthesis. Injury 33(3):C41–C46
Dedrick DK, Mackenzie JR, Burney RE (1986) Complications of femoral neck fracture in young adults. J Trauma 26:932–937
Upadhyay A, Jain P, Mishra P, Maini L, Gautum VK, Dhaon BK (2004) Delayed internal fixation of fractures of the neck of the femur in young adults. A prospective randomised study comparing closed and open reduction. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86:1035–1040
Protzman RR, Burkhalter WE (1976) Femoral-neck fractures in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:689–695
Haidukewych GJ, Rothwell WS, Jacofsky DJ, Torchia ME, Berry DJ (2004) Operative treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients between the ages of fifteen and fifty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:1711–1716
Stankewich CJ, Chapman J, Muthusamy R, Quaid G, Schemitsch E, Tencer AF et al (1996) Relationship of mechanical factors to the strength of proximal femur fractures fixed with cancellous screws. J Orthop Trauma 10:248–257
Blair B, Koval KJ, Kummer F, Zuckerman JD (1994) Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur. A biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 306:256–263
Rupprecht M, Grossterlinden L, Ruecker AH, De Oliveira AN, Sellenschloh K, Nüchtern J et al (2011) A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw. J Trauma 71(3):625–634
Schwartsmann CR, Jacobus LS, Spinelli Lde F, Boschin LC, Gonçalves RZ, Yépez AK et al (2014) Dynamic hip screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a prospective study with 96 patients. ISRN Orthop 2014:257871
Ismail H, Phedy, Oktavian Irawadi P, Gunawan B, Simbardjo D (2012) Outcome of cloverleaf locking plate fixation for femoral neck fractures in young adults. Malays Orthop J 6(1):30–34
Valverde JA, Alonso MG, Porro JG, Rueda D, Larrauri PM, Soler J (1998) Use of the gamma nail in the treatment of fractures of the proximal femur. J Clin Orthop Relat Res 350:56–61
Bartoníček J, Rammelt S (2014) The history of internal fixation of proximal femur fractures Ernst Pohl-the genius behind. Int Orthop 38(11):2421–2426. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2320-3, PMID: 24687268
Aktselis I, Kokoroghiannis C, Fragkomichalos E, Koundis G, Deligeorgis A, Daskalakis E et al (2014) Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Int Orthop 38(1):155–161. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2196-7, PMID: 24318319
Kyle F, Dickson, Munz JW (2007) Locked plating: biomechanics and biology. Tech Orthop 22(4):E1–E6
Hasenboehler EA, Agudelo JF, Morgan SJ, Smith WR, Hak DJ, Stahel PF (2007) Treatment of complex proximal femoral fractures with the proximal femur locking compression plate. Orthopedics 30:618–623
Windolf M, Muths R, Braunstein V, Gueorguiev B, Hänni M, Schwieger K (2009) Quantification of cancellous bone-compaction due to DHS® blade insertion and influence upon cut-out resistance. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24:53–58
Chua D, Jaglal SB, Schatzker J (1998) Predictors of early failure of fixation in the treatment of displaced subcapital hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma 12(4):230–234
Swiontkowski MF (1994) Intracapsular fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:129–138
Brodetti A (1960) The blood supply of the femoral neck and head in relation to the damaging effects of nails and screws. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 42:794–801
Dhar SA, Gani NU, Butt MF, Farooq M, Mir MR (2008) Delayed union of an operated fracture of the femoral neck. J Orthop Traumatol 9:97–99
Freitas A, da Costa HI, Silva CJ, Rangel CH (2013) Static load test of the modified sliding hip screw: the DHS-AF®. Acta Ortop Bras 21(5):251–254
Audigé L, Cagienard F, Sprecher CM, Suhm N, Müller MA (2014) Radiographic quantification of dynamic hip screw migration. Int Orthop 38(4):839–845. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2146-4, PMID: 24146176
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siavashi, B., Aalirezaei, A., Moosavi, M. et al. A comparative study between multiple cannulated screws and dynamic hip screw for fixation of femoral neck fracture in adults. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 2069–2071 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2881-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2881-9