Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative study between multiple cannulated screws and dynamic hip screw for fixation of femoral neck fracture in adults

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In younger adults with fractures of the femoral neck, anatomic reduction is compulsory and maintaining the reduction is crucial. Both cannulated screws and dynamic hip screw (DHS) have the capacity of compression in the fracture site but the strength for keeping reduction is not the same. The aim of this study was to compare the results with fixations of the femoral neck fractures with cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw.

Methods

This is a randomized clinical trial study on 58 cases with a minimum of one year follow-up. Leg length discrepancy, Harris Hip Score, infection, avascular necrosis of femoral head, and union of the fracture site were evaluated.

Results

There were two failures in the first trimester in the cannulated screw group and three more failures in the second and third trimesters in this group. In the DHS group, there was no reduction and fixation failure in the follow-up period. There was no fixation failure (0 %) in Group B (DHS) but there were five fixation failures (18 %) in Group A (screw), and there is significant difference between the groups (p < 0.001). The rate of avascular necrosis was the same in both groups.

Conclusions

It seems to us that in our practice the fixation of femoral neck fracture in young adults with the DHS is a better option compared with the osteosynthsis with multiple cannulated screws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baumgaertner MR, Higgins TF (2001) Femoral neck fractures. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD (eds) Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in adults. Lippincott Williams & Williams, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ly TV, Swiontkowski MF (2008) Treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(10):2254–2266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Szita J, Cserháti P, Bosch U, Manninger J, Bodzay T, Fekete K (2002) Intracapsular femoral neck fractures: the importance of early reduction and stable osteosynthesis. Injury 33(3):C41–C46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dedrick DK, Mackenzie JR, Burney RE (1986) Complications of femoral neck fracture in young adults. J Trauma 26:932–937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Upadhyay A, Jain P, Mishra P, Maini L, Gautum VK, Dhaon BK (2004) Delayed internal fixation of fractures of the neck of the femur in young adults. A prospective randomised study comparing closed and open reduction. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86:1035–1040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Protzman RR, Burkhalter WE (1976) Femoral-neck fractures in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:689–695

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haidukewych GJ, Rothwell WS, Jacofsky DJ, Torchia ME, Berry DJ (2004) Operative treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients between the ages of fifteen and fifty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:1711–1716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stankewich CJ, Chapman J, Muthusamy R, Quaid G, Schemitsch E, Tencer AF et al (1996) Relationship of mechanical factors to the strength of proximal femur fractures fixed with cancellous screws. J Orthop Trauma 10:248–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blair B, Koval KJ, Kummer F, Zuckerman JD (1994) Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur. A biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 306:256–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rupprecht M, Grossterlinden L, Ruecker AH, De Oliveira AN, Sellenschloh K, Nüchtern J et al (2011) A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw. J Trauma 71(3):625–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwartsmann CR, Jacobus LS, Spinelli Lde F, Boschin LC, Gonçalves RZ, Yépez AK et al (2014) Dynamic hip screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a prospective study with 96 patients. ISRN Orthop 2014:257871

  12. Ismail H, Phedy, Oktavian Irawadi P, Gunawan B, Simbardjo D (2012) Outcome of cloverleaf locking plate fixation for femoral neck fractures in young adults. Malays Orthop J 6(1):30–34

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Valverde JA, Alonso MG, Porro JG, Rueda D, Larrauri PM, Soler J (1998) Use of the gamma nail in the treatment of fractures of the proximal femur. J Clin Orthop Relat Res 350:56–61

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bartoníček J, Rammelt S (2014) The history of internal fixation of proximal femur fractures Ernst Pohl-the genius behind. Int Orthop 38(11):2421–2426. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2320-3, PMID: 24687268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aktselis I, Kokoroghiannis C, Fragkomichalos E, Koundis G, Deligeorgis A, Daskalakis E et al (2014) Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Int Orthop 38(1):155–161. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2196-7, PMID: 24318319

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kyle F, Dickson, Munz JW (2007) Locked plating: biomechanics and biology. Tech Orthop 22(4):E1–E6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hasenboehler EA, Agudelo JF, Morgan SJ, Smith WR, Hak DJ, Stahel PF (2007) Treatment of complex proximal femoral fractures with the proximal femur locking compression plate. Orthopedics 30:618–623

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Windolf M, Muths R, Braunstein V, Gueorguiev B, Hänni M, Schwieger K (2009) Quantification of cancellous bone-compaction due to DHS® blade insertion and influence upon cut-out resistance. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24:53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chua D, Jaglal SB, Schatzker J (1998) Predictors of early failure of fixation in the treatment of displaced subcapital hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma 12(4):230–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Swiontkowski MF (1994) Intracapsular fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:129–138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brodetti A (1960) The blood supply of the femoral neck and head in relation to the damaging effects of nails and screws. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 42:794–801

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dhar SA, Gani NU, Butt MF, Farooq M, Mir MR (2008) Delayed union of an operated fracture of the femoral neck. J Orthop Traumatol 9:97–99

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Freitas A, da Costa HI, Silva CJ, Rangel CH (2013) Static load test of the modified sliding hip screw: the DHS-AF®. Acta Ortop Bras 21(5):251–254

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Audigé L, Cagienard F, Sprecher CM, Suhm N, Müller MA (2014) Radiographic quantification of dynamic hip screw migration. Int Orthop 38(4):839–845. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2146-4, PMID: 24146176

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babak Siavashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siavashi, B., Aalirezaei, A., Moosavi, M. et al. A comparative study between multiple cannulated screws and dynamic hip screw for fixation of femoral neck fracture in adults. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 2069–2071 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2881-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2881-9

Keywords

Navigation