Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Are pre-operative anthropometric parameters helpful in predicting length and thickness of quadrupled hamstring graft for ACL reconstruction in adults? A prospective study and literature review

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cross-sectional diameter of 7 mm or more of graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is arguably the single most important factor determining the success of the operation. Pre-operative anthropometric parameters have been reported to correlate with diameter of quadrupled hamstring graft, which is the most popular graft choice today. We conducted this prospective study to determine the value of some anthropometric measurements to predict the length of harvested semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and quadrupled hamstring graft diameter. We also assessed the reliability of the mathematical equation in accurately predicting the graft diameter.

Methods

Height, weight, BMI and thigh length of 160 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction was measured before surgery. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis length of harvested semitendinous and gracilis tendons along with quadrupled graft diameter were correlated to height, weight, BMI and thigh length.

Results

Ninety-six percent had graft diameter of 7 mm or more. Height and thigh length were found to be most strongly correlating to both the length of harvested tendons and the quadrupled graft diameter (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.25–0.39). Patients with height less than 147 cm were found to be at highest risk for inadequate graft diameter (less than 7 mm). Although the anthropometric parameters were found to be significantly related to height and thigh length, the strength of association is moderate. The mathematical equation for prediction of graft diameter using height was found to inaccurately over-predict the graft diameter in 33.1 % of cases, assessed using Bland-Altman plot.

Conclusion

Anthropometric parameters, especially height and thigh length, can serve as a guide to plan hamstring graft diameter and length before ACL reconstruction. But, it is not advisable to rely on mathematical equations for absolute values of graft parameters as there is risk of over-estimating hamstring length or graft thickness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamner DL, Brown CH Jr, Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Hayes WC (1999) Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:549–557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 35:564–574. doi:10.1177/0363546506296042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aglietti P, Giron F, Buzzi R, Biddau F, Sasso F (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone–patellar tendon–bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2143–2155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maletis GB, Cameron SL, Tengan JJ, Burchette RJ (2007) A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of patellar tendon and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws. Am J Sports Med 35:384–394. doi:10.1177/0363546506294361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams RJ III, Hyman J, Petrigliano F, Rozental T, Wickiewicz TL (2005) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:51–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pichler W, Tesch NP, Schwantzer G et al (2008) Differences in length and cross-section of semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and their effect on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90:516–519. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.90b4.19994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kautzner J, Kos P, Hanus M, Trc T, Havalas V (2015) A comparison of ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring autograft in female patients: a prospective randomised study. Int Orthop 39:125–130. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2495-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahmoud SS, Odak S, Coogan S, McNicholas MJ (2014) A prospective study to assess the outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 38:1489–1494. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2324-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamada M, Shino K, Horibe S et al (2005) Changes in cross-sectional area of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament grafts as a function of time following transplantation. Arthroscopy 21:917–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Magnussen RA, Lawrence JT, West RL et al (2012) Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy 28:526–531. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tuman JM, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ, Baumfeld JA, Nguyen HS, Hart JM (2007) Predictors for hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35:1945–1949. doi:10.1177/0363546507304667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Treme G, Diduch DR, Billante MJ, Miller MD, Hart JM (2008) Hamstring graft size prediction: a prospective clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 36:2204–2209. doi:10.1177/0363546508319901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwartzberg R, Burkhart B, Lariviere C (2008) Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft diameter and length for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop 37:157–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma CB, Keifa E, Dunn W, Fu FH, Harner CD (2010) Can pre-operative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter? Knee 17:81–83. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2009.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Loo W et al (2010) Can we predict ACL hamstring graft sizes in the Asian male? A clinical relationship study of anthropometric features and 4-strand hamstring graft sizes. Malays Orthop J 4:9–12. doi:10.5704/MOJ.1007.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boisvert CB, Aubin ME, DeAngelis N (2011) Relationship between anthropometric measurements and hamstring autograft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop 40:293–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pinheiro LF Jr, de Andrade MA, Teixeira LE, Bicalho LA, Lemos WG, Azeredo SA et al (2011) Intra-operative four-stranded hamstring tendon graft diameter evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:811–815. doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1387-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Celiktas (2013) Prediction of the quadruple hamstring autograft thickness in ACL reconstruction using anthropometric measures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 47:14–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yasumoto M, Deie M, Sunagawa T, Adachi N, Kobayashi K, Ochi M (2006) Predictive value of 3-dimensional computer tomography measurement of semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:259–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bickel BA, Fowler TT, Mowbray JG, Adler B, Klingele K, Phillips G (2008) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging cross-sectional area for the measurement of hamstring autograft diameter for reconstruction of the adolescent anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 24:1336–1341. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2008.07.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Erquicia J, Gelber PE, Doreste JL et al (2013) How to improve the prediction of quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis autograft sizes with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med 41:1857–1863. doi:10.1177/0363546513479340

  22. Schwartzberg RS (2014) Prediction of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon lengths and diameters for double bundle ACL reconstruction. Am J Orthop 43:E1–E6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Challa S, Satyaprasad J (2013) Hamstring graft size and anthropometry in south Indian population. J Clin Orthop Trauma 4:135–138. doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2013.09.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lorenz S, Ahrens P, Kirchhoff S, Wolf P, Hinterwimmer S, Obermeir A, Beirer M, Kirchhoff C (2015) Dynamic quantification of tibio-femoral rotation in postero-lateral bundle insufficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cadaver study. Int Orthop 39:865–870. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2537-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Helito CP, Bonadio MB, Demange MK, da Mota E, Albuqerque RF, Pécora JR, Camanho GL, Angelini FJ (2015) Functional assessment of combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner with a single femoral tunnel: a two-year minimum follow-up. Int Orthop 39:543–548. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2576-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kasturba Medical College, Orthopaedics, Manipal, India

    Saumitra Goyal, Vivek Pandey & Kiran Acharya

  2. Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India

    Nadia Matias

Authors
  1. Saumitra Goyal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nadia Matias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vivek Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kiran Acharya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saumitra Goyal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goyal, S., Matias, N., Pandey, V. et al. Are pre-operative anthropometric parameters helpful in predicting length and thickness of quadrupled hamstring graft for ACL reconstruction in adults? A prospective study and literature review. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 173–181 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2818-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2818-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation