Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 39, Issue 7, pp 1365–1370 | Cite as

Prevention of recurrence of tibia and ankle deformities after bone lengthening in children with type II fibular hemimelia

  • Arnold Popkov
  • Anna Aranovich
  • Dmitry PopkovEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate development of the tibia after Ilizarov lengthening and deformity correction depending on whether or not the simultaneous resection of fibular anlage was performed in children with fibular aplasia type II, who did not undergo early surgery.

Methods

The study analyses results of reconstructive treatment in 38 children at the age of over four years. Two groups of children are compared: bifocal tibial lengthening with the Ilizarov device (group I) and bifocal lengthening associated with resection of the fibular anlage (group II). The results were estimated at 12 months and in the long-term exceeding three years.

Results

Radiological data of measurement of the anatomical lateral distal tibial angle (aLDTA) show surgical correction of deformities achieved in both groups. During the further limb growth a tendency to normalisation of the aLDTA was observed only in the group II. Quick relapse of the angular deformities of the tibial shaft in the first group occurred mainly during further growth of the limb regardless of complete correction at the time of treatment. On the other hand, there were no recurrences of diaphyseal deformities in the group II.

Conclusions

In children with congenital fibular deficiency of type II at the age of four years, the bone lengthening and deformity correction should be associated with fibular anlage resection. That approach improves conditions for distal tibia development and prevents or decreases significantly the recurrence of deformities of the tibia and ankle joint in long-term follow-up.

Keywords

Fibular hemimelia Bone lengthening Ankle joint 

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants (parents or guardians) included in the study

References

  1. 1.
    Rogala EJ, Wynne-Davies R, Littlejohn A, Gormley J (1974) Congenital limb abnormalities: frequency and aetiological factors. Data from the Edinburgh register of the newborn (1964-8). J Med Genet 11:221–233PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crawford DA, Tompkins BJ, Baird GO, Caskey PM (2012) The long-term function of the knee in patients with fibular hemimelia and anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 94(3):328–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Letts M, Vincent N (1993) Congenital longitudinal deficiency of the fibula (fibular hemimelia). Parental refusal of amputation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 287:160–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Patel M, Paley D, Herzenberg JE (2002) Limb-lengthening versus amputation for fibular hemimelia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(2):317–319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Catagni MA, Radwan M, Lovisetti L, Guerreschi F, Elmoghazy NA (2011) Limb lengthening and deformity correction by the Ilizarov technique in type III fibular hemimelia: an alternative to amputation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(4):1175–1180. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1635-7 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamdy RC, Makhdom AM, Saran N, Birch J (2014) Congenital fibular deficiency. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 22(4):246–55. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-04-246 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng JC, Chueng KW, Ng BK (1998) Severe progressive deformities after limb lengthening in type-II fibular hemimelia. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 80:772–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walker JL, Knapp D, Minter C, Boakes JL, Salazar JC, Sanders JO, Lubicky JP, Drvaric DM, Davids JR (2009) Adult outcomes following amputation or lengthening for fibular deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(4):797–804. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01297 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    El-Sayed MM, Correll J, Pohlig K (2010) Limb sparing reconstructive surgery and Ilizarov lengthening in fibular hemimelia of Achterman-Kalamchi type II patients. J Pediatr Orthop B 19(1):55–60. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e32832f5ace PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    El-Tayeby HM, Ahmed AA (2012) Ankle reconstruction in type II fibular hemimelia. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 7(1):23–26. doi: 10.1007/s11751-012-0129-4 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Radler C, Antonietti G, Ganger R, Grill F (2011) Recurrence of axial malalignment after surgical correction in congenital femoral deficiency and fibular hemimelia. Int Orthop 35(11):1683–1688. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1266-y PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Changulani M, Ali F, Mulgrew E, Day JB, Zenios M (2010) Outcome of limb lengthening in fibular hemimelia and a functional foot. J Child Orthop 4(6):519–524. doi: 10.1007/s11832-010-0291-5.10 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alaseirlis DA, Korompilias AV, Beris AE, Soucacos PN (2011) Residual malformations and leg length discrepancy after treatment of fibular hemimelia. J Orthop Surg Res 6:51. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-51 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Achterman C, Kalamchi А (1979) Congenital deficiency of the fibular. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 61(2):133–157Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chao EY, Neluheni EV, Hsu RW, Paley D (1994) Biomechanics of malalignment. Orthop Clin North Am 25:379–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Popkov D, Lascombes P, Berte N, Hetzel L, Baptista BR, Popkov A, Journeau P (2015) The normal radiological anteroposterior alignment of the lower limb in children. Skeletal Radiol 44(2):197–206. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-1953-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Szoke G, Mackenzie WG, Domos G, Berki S, Kiss S, Bowen JR (2011) Possible mistakes in prediction of bone maturation in fibular hemimelia by Moseley chart. Int Orthop 35(5):755–759. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-0988-6 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rodriguez-Ramirez A, Thacker MM, Becerra LC, Riddle EC, Mackenzie WG (2010) Limb length discrepancy and congenital limb anomalies in fibular hemimelia. J Pediatr Orthop B 19(5):436–440. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e32832d5d7d PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boakes JL, Stevens PM, Moseley RF (1991) Treatement of genu valgum deformity in congenital absence of the fibula. J Pediatr Orthop 11(6):721–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jawish R, Carlioz H (1991) Conservation of the foot in the treatment of longitudinal external ectromelia. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 77:115–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gubin AV, Borzunov DY, Malkova TA (2013) The Ilizarov paradigm: thirty years with the Ilizarov method, current concerns and future research. Int Orthop 37(8):1533–1539. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1935-0 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eren I, Eralp L, Kocaoglu M (2013) Comparative clinical study on deformity correction accuracy of different external fixators. Int Orthop 37(11):2247–2252. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2116-x PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lan X, Zhang L, Tang P, Xia H, Li G, Peng A, Han Y, Yuan B, Xu W (2013) S-osteotomy with lengthening and then nailing compared with traditional Ilizarov method. Int Orthop 37(10):1995–2000. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1962-x PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Popkov D, Journeau P, Popkov A, Pedeutour B, Haumont T, Lascombes P (2012) Analysis of segmental residual growth after progressive bone lengthening in congenital lower limb deformity. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(6):621–628. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.06.012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian Ilizarov Scientific Centre for Restorative Traumatology and OrthopaedicsKurganRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations